r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-02 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
Hello, r232411 broke onboard 1068 detection on all boxes with SuperMicro X8ST3 motherboards for us. All of them are also equipped with two extra 1068 controllers, which are detected fine. Reverting to r231518 with otherwise latest stable kernel works around the problem. The issue is still there

Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:52:14PM -0600, McConnell, Stephen wrote: >> Marius, >> >> Since the 0x59 device is a MegaRAID device, shouldn't you be using the >> MegaRAID driver.  Why is the MPT driver being used in this case?  The >> problem i

Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:26:38AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: >> The device in question is a built-in 1068-based controller on a >> SuperMicro X8ST3 board. >> >> It can be converted to MegaRAID mode with a spe

Re: kernel ignores kenv comconsole_speed?

2007-06-06 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 10/25/06, Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Am 25.10.2006 um 10:57 schrieb Stefan Bethke: > I'm not sure that would be so easy. However, CONSPEED is/was the > setting to be used if the actual setting cannot be determined when > sio initializes. The code is there to determine the curre

Re: "conatainer"

2007-11-23 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 04:50:24AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Another fun one to grep for is " teh" or "teh ". grep -w teh :) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send a

Re: bge Ierr rate increase from 5.3R -> 6.1R

2006-12-12 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 12/11/06, Greg Eden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via cvsup and buildworld. Since the upgrade I've seen an increase in the number of Input packet errors reported on the bge cards in on both boxes. One is a HP DL360g3, the other is a HP DL3

Re: 6.2 release and atausb

2007-01-15 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/15/07, Boris Kovalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello! Is this ok that atausb is not shown in NOTES and LINT? Even I see no module atausb.ko after kernel recompilation. Right, somebody has been carefully hiding this feature from us. I've just tried it - and... it works. No performance b

Re: Dell hardware raid 0 (sas5ir) or gmirror?

2007-01-15 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/15/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm purchasing a new server, and was wondering what anyone thought about whether to pay extra for the SAS5IR card so I can RAID0 the two drives, or whether to just rely on gmirror. My worry about the former is that I can't seem to find mana

Re: Dell hardware raid 0 (sas5ir) or gmirror?

2007-01-16 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/16/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 1/15/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm purchasing a new server, and was wondering what anyone thought about >> whether to pay extra for the SAS5IR card so I

Re: 6.2 release and atausb

2007-01-16 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/15/07, Boris Kovalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello! I also getting strange errors like Jan 15 12:20:58 boris kernel: afd0: FAILURE - PREVENT_ALLOW ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 P.S. How You get 12Mb/s? With my flash Jan 15 12:20:58 boris kernel: da0: Removable Direct Acc

Re: gmirror disks vs partitions

2007-01-17 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A poll for opinions if I may? I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which pair up two drives at the physical level (i.e. mirror /dev/ad0s1 with /dev/ad1s1). Of course there are other ways of doing it to, like mirrorin

Re: gmirror disks vs partitions

2007-01-17 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/17/07, Matthew X. Economou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apart from potentially avoiding a whole disk from being copied > during a resync after a crash, are there any other advantages to > using partition level mirroring instead of drive level mirroring? Joe, Partition-level software RAID p

Re: gmirror disks vs partitions

2007-01-17 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/18/07, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> A poll for opinions if I may? >> >> I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which >> pair up t

Re: PAE does not give any ram increase, why?

2007-04-21 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 4/21/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello! I've upgraded one of my servers today. Now it is Asus P5p800-VM Pentium D 3.0Ghz 4GB RAM (4x1 GB) 3WARE raid5 FreebSD 6.2 cvsed today compiled from sources. after that i decided to try PAE. It runs just fine but when i compare availabl

Re: PAE does not give any ram increase, why?

2007-04-21 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 4/22/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 4/21/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I've upgraded one of my servers today. >> Now it is >> Asus P5p800-VM >> Pentium D 3.0Ghz &g

Re: Just saying hi.

2007-04-30 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 5/1/07, Sam Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi everyone, just thought I'd say hello, new to the list. Hope I can help with some problems; and if I have any, I hope you guys can help me. :D Welcome! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http:

Re: too much spam (Was: no subject)

2006-03-15 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 3/16/06, J. Buck Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You know, I tried printing it out, but I still can't see the naked lady... :-) Beware, by answering spam messages like that you get your address into spam filters all over the world. Change the subject line next time. _

Re: too much spam (Was: no subject)

2006-03-17 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 3/17/06, J. Buck Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 3/16/06, J. Buck Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> You know, I tried printing it out, but I still can't see the naked lady... > >> > >

Recent MFC's causing trouble with network and mouse

2006-01-30 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
I upgraded my world and kernel from about a week's old state to today's source and network (vge) and mouse (ums) stopped working. vge0 has a formerly usual trouble of link state going up and down, while ums0 doesn't move or feel its buttons (tried moused and xorg). Had a look at cvs, didn't see an

Re: Recent MFC's causing trouble with network and mouse

2006-01-31 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/31/06, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 02:27:58AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > A> I upgraded my world and kernel from about a week's > A> old state to today's source and network (vge) and > A> mouse (ums) stopped wo

Re: Recent MFC's causing trouble with network and mouse

2006-01-31 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/31/06, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:38:44PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > A> On 1/31/06, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 02:27:58AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > A>