Re: bios disk numbers and device names

2004-11-29 Thread Andrea Campi
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 07:21:00AM -0500, Michael Grant wrote: > Has anyone thought about this problem? Is there some spare space in > the label that could be used for a device name that, if set, could > be used in place of (or an alias for) a name like da0? GEOM_LABEL is what you're looking for.

Re: bios disk numbers and device names

2004-11-29 Thread Andrea Campi
;-) Andrea > > Michael Grant > > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:39:58PM +0100, Andrea Campi wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 07:21:00AM -0500, Michael Grant wrote: > > > Has anyone thought about this problem? Is there some spare space in > > > the label th

panic: bus_dmamap_load_mbuf_sg still there

2006-12-27 Thread Andrea Campi
Hi, this panic has been reported a few times in the past, both by me and other people; I just updated my Soekris box to 6.2-RC2 and it's still happening. panic: bus_dmamap_load_mbuf_sg: no mbuf packet header! KDB: stack backtrace: panic(c06128c3,c060f93c,c055b9af,c0db804e,c0db803e,...) at panic+0

Re: panic: bus_dmamap_load_mbuf_sg still there

2006-12-28 Thread Andrea Campi
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 08:50:10PM -0800, Tom Samplonius wrote: > > I have a Soekris board, so I'm interested. What's the PR number for the > bug? How frequently does it occur? > > It is good to log all of the details to the PR. Right. I have hopened a PR for this, as well as a possibly r

Re: background fsck can be dangerous!

2005-07-03 Thread Andrea Campi
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:45:40AM +0300, Niki Denev wrote: > Before the background fsck finished some files were unreadable, > and they happened to be some libraries used by my mail software. > After the fsck finished these libraries were accessible again and > everything was normal and working, a

Re: Machine Replication

2005-07-21 Thread Andrea Campi
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:04:01PM -0500, Dan Mack wrote: > Is there a jumpstart (solaris), kickstart (redhat linux), roboinst (irix), > or ignite (hpux) like auto-installer for BSD? > > If there was, then I wouldn't image the disk at all, I'd instead setup up > custom network images that I could

Re: newfs_msdos onto an image file

2006-01-15 Thread Andrea Campi
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:49:51PM +, Brian Candler wrote: > Furthermore, why do I still have to pretend that the device is a 1440K > floppy disk? If I remove -f 1440 I get: > > # newfs_msdos -h 64 -u 32 -s 256000 -a 125 -F 16 -b 4096 -c 8 /dev/md0 > newfs_msdos: Cannot get number of sectors,