work would be highly appreciated!
Cheers,
Albert Cervin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Thanks!
"I should hope not. ext4 vs zfs comparison isn't fair for either."
I do realize that comparing ext4 and ZFS is not really giving anything
but it tells us one thing, ext4 would work whereas ZFS would not for
our use case, which was unexpected, at least to me.
vfs.zfs.txg.timeout is alre
tory in my opinion...
Will try a bit with the meta limit.
Thanks,
Albert
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 11/24/2015 10:26 AM, Albert Cervin wrote:
>> vfs.zfs.txg.timeout is already verified to be 5 (the default). I have
>> also turned off atime and vfs.zfs.arc
Hi again,
I have conducted a few other experiments and concluded that ZFS is NOT
the culprit here and my suspicions now go to Samba instead which seems
to behave really badly under these conditions...
Thanks for all the ZFS help though, much appreciated!
Cheers,
Albert
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1
I accused you! ;)
Thanks again!
// Albert
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Albert Cervin wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I have conducted a few other experiments and concluded that ZFS is NOT
> the culprit here and my suspicions now go to Samba instead which seems
> to behave really ba
