Re: broken re(4)

On Thu, 29 May 2008 23:03:01 +1000 "Dewayne Geraghty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about RE: broken re(4): DG> You might try, after rebooting, to physically unplug and replug your DG> networking cables. I already did try that one or twice, without any success. DG> I have a few EN-15000 and SN-18000

Re: broken re(4)

On Thu, 29 May 2008 13:10:48 +0200 Dimitry Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): DA> FYI, that patch doesn't compile, due to a typo... Fix below: Thanks, I will try that patch tomorrow. Meanwhile I have set up two more machines. Now I have 5 ITX systems, each with 2 re-NICs, a

Re: broken re(4)

On Thu, 29 May 2008 18:52:55 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): OF> In that case I would suspect that the one piece of hardware OF> that is misbehaving is broken and needs to be replaced. I agree. I just do not know yet which part is broken. OF> > The o

Re: broken re(4)

On Thu, 29 May 2008 19:09:12 +0200 Dimitry Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): DA> > I have 5 ITX systems, each with 2 re-NICs, and only one is behaving DA> > strange. DA> Just as a data point, my ITX board is a JetWay J7F4K1G2E. The ones I have are JW J7F4K1G5 A, I guess.

Re: broken re(4)

On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:44:43 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): OF> > Talking about this controller: This is also the only board I am OF> > using with PCI cards (and thus with a PCI riser) at all. I remember OF> > vaguely that I had a few problems getti

Re: broken re(4)

On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:49:24 +0200 Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): WB> > Typing "pci riser card jumper" in Google will give you WB> > many more pages with interesting (or frightening) stuff WB> > to read. WB> Well, if you know how the PCI bus electrically works this

Re: broken re(4)

On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:44:43 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): OF> That rings a bell ... OF> I remember reports of riser cards that apparently changed OF> the timing on the PCI bus so they were only marginally OF> compliant with the spec, or maybe not ev

Re: broken re(4)

On Fri, 30 May 2008 14:03:08 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY> Since you're running this patch would you post dmesg output related PY> with re(4)? Also please post the output of "devinfo -rv | grep PY> oui". Here is my output with the latest (28th May) pat

Re: broken re(4)

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:43:04 +0200 Daniele Bastianini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): DB> > - copying large files (more than some 100MB) via ssh/scp drops the DB> > connection due to "corrupted MAC on input": DB> > Disconnecting: Corrupted MAC on input. DB> > lost connection DB>

Re: broken re(4)

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:26:29 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): OF> > On the other hand, I have not been able to get more than about OF> > 10MByte/s through the interfaces of this particular system. I have OF> > 1GBit-networking equipment, and the other

Re: broken re(4)

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:22:28 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY> Before checking performance of network controller you had to rule PY> out other factors like disk I/O. Use one of benchmark programs in PY> ports/benchmark. I already did simple benchmarking by

Re: broken re(4)

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:01:26 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY> > I already did simple benchmarking by using "dd if=/dev/zero PY> > of=file" which gave me several 10s of MByte/s under all PY> > circumstances. Can you recommend one of the benchmarking prog

Re: dev.ix.0.queueX.interrupt_rate

On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:29:26 +0300 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote about dev.ix.0.queueX.interrupt_rate: SO> Last -stable, no tuning. Is this normal? >From 10.2-rel (and still having severe performance issues with NFS as reported before): dev.ix.0.queue7.interrupt_rate: 31250 dev.ix.0.queue6.interrupt

Re: dev.ix.0.queueX.interrupt_rate

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 07:55:49 -0400 (EDT) Rick Macklem wrote about Re: dev.ix.0.queueX.interrupt_rate: RM> If you have tso enabled, you could try this patch: RM> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3477 RM> RM> If TSO is disabled, then we don't have an explanation for poor NFS RM> performance yet.

Re: dev.ix.0.queueX.interrupt_rate

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:45:08 +0300 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote about Re: dev.ix.0.queueX.interrupt_rate: SO> For discover poor network performance you need: [...] I am already through this, see I just wanted to let /you/ know

high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2

Hi all, A couple of weeks ago, I updated an older storage server (2 CPUs, 4 cores each, 48GB RAM, 36x4GB HDDs, 3 LSI-based mps controllers) from 10.4 to 11.2. The first thing I noticed was that booting takes much longer now. The system probes each HDD (there are 36 of them, attached to mps control

Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 19:34:43 +0700 Eugene Grosbein wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2: > > Any ideas? > Maybe this box has some clocking problems incompatible with tickless > kernel. Is there anything I could look out for in dmesg or similar to spot

Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:09:18 +0700 Eugene Grosbein wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2: > Try switching to "HPET" in both cases and do not wait for next disaster > but do it right now with sysctl command, reboot is not needed. > You can restore default s

Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:37:02 +0100 Gerrit Kühn wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2: > > Try switching to "HPET" in both cases and do not wait for next disaster > > but do it right now with sysctl command, reboot is not neede

Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2

On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:48:23 +0100 Gerrit Kühn wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2: > The issue is back this morning: sys and irq load incredibly high, system > hardly usable anymore. > I guess it's time to try kern.eventtimer.periodic=1 n

Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2

On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:48:29 +0700 Eugene Grosbein wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2: > Fill a PR and include exact output showing IRQs and their count numbers. Which output would that include? Is vmstat -i sufficient? Should I revert to the default t

Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2

On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:12:34 +0700 Eugene Grosbein wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to 11.2: > Just report all that you have already tested, and results (lack of). I didn't pipe all the debug info into files so far, so I'll have to wait a few days for the is

limit process memory usage

Hello all, I have an application that sometimes develops some kind of memory leak or similar and eats up all RAM within a few minutes until the system is running out of memory and swap so the kernel starts randomly killing other processes and finally the crashes. Is there a way to limit the memory

Re: limit process memory usage

Am Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:18:12 -0800 schrieb Julian Elischer : > start with the man page  man 1 limits and follow the "see also" links. Ah, great, that helps, thanks a lot! I wonder why I didn't find this before. I found rctl that is linked in the "see also" section of limits. However, there is

System unbootable after upgrade to FBSD 7

Hi, I just upgraded my first system from 6-stable to 7. installkernel and installworld went well. However, the system won't boot anymore. :-( The bootloader still appears, grabs kernel and modules, followed by Can't work out which disk we are booting from. Guessed BIOS device 0x not found

Re: System unbootable after upgrade to FBSD 7

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:38:00 +0100 Gerrit Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about System unbootable after upgrade to FBSD 7: GK> Can't work out which disk we are booting from. GK> Guessed BIOS device 0x not found by probes, defaulting to GK> disk0: GK> panic: free: g

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 Breaks re and rl Network Interface Drivers

On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 11:36:42 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote about Re: FreeBSD 7.1 Breaks re and rl Network Interface Drivers: PY> Have you tried re(4) in HEAD? PY> I had one report that re(4) in HEAD still does not fix the issue so PY> I posted a possible workaround for that. Unfortunately he didn't P

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 Breaks re and rl Network Interface Drivers

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:51:41 +1000 "Gavin Stone-Tolcher" wrote about RE: FreeBSD 7.1 Breaks re and rl Network Interface Drivers: GST> Hi, Just some more feedback on your patch. GST> I have a Jetway J7F4K1G2E board with dual embedded GST> RealteK RTL8110SC. I tried using the 19 January 2009 jkim

zfs: dataset is busy

Hi all, I have several machines here that do automatic snapshotting via RSEs snapshot-tool (sysutils/freebsd-snapshot). I use a homemade script to incrementally transfer daily snapshots to a backup server. This runs fine with machines running 7.0-STABLE of Jun 08. However, I have one box with 7.1-

Re: ZFS NAS configuration question

On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:41:36 +0300 Dan Naumov wrote about ZFS NAS configuration question: DN> So, this leaves me with 1 SATA port used for a FreeBSD disk and 4 SATA DN> ports available for tinketing with ZFS. Do you have a USB port available to boot from? A conventional USB stick (I use 4 GB or

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 (and 7.2) Breaks re and rl Network Interface Drivers

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:33:06 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote about Re: FreeBSD 7.1 Breaks re and rl Network Interface Drivers: PY> > I cannot say if the actual issue I had with 7.1-stable has gone PY> > away, too, because this only occured after a longer time of PY> > operation. However, up to now ever

zfs kernel panic

Hi folks, I just upgraded a zfs server from 7.0-something to 7.2-stable and hoped to get rid of some minor instabilities I experienced every 6 months or so. Unfortunately, the new system crashed for the first time after only a few hours when copying some files via scp onto it. I got a kernel panic

Re: zfs kernel panic

On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:44:13 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote about Re: zfs kernel panic: PJD> If this is amd64, add vm.kmem_size="4G" to your loader.conf back. Yes, it is amd64 (sorry I did not mention that). I will add the option back (the one I used before was set to a somewhat lower value, som

Re: zfs kernel panic

On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:44:13 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote about Re: zfs kernel panic: PJD> If this is amd64, add vm.kmem_size="4G" to your loader.conf back. What about vm.kmem_size_max? Does that also need tuning? cu Gerrit ___ freebsd-stable@fre

Linux/KDE and NFS locking on 7-stable

Hi all, I upgraded a FreeBSD fileserver last week from 7.0-stable to 7.2-stable and experience some weird problems now with Linux NFS clients. The Linux Clients mount their home directories via nfs. I usually use "nolock" on the client side, because file locking was always troublesome in the past.

zfs panic

Hi, I got the following panic when rebooting after a crash on 7.2-REL: panic: solaris assert: dmu_read(os, smo->smo_object, offset, size, entry_map) == 0 (0x5 == 0x0), file: /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/spa ce_map.c, line: 341 This seems to be the same pan

zfs panic mounting fs after crash with RC2

Hi, Yesterday I had the opportunity to play around with my yet-to-become new fileserver a bit more. Originally I had installed 7.2-R, which I upgraded to 8-0-RC2 yesterday. After that I upgraded my zpool consisting of 4 disks in raidz1 constallation to v13. Some time later I tried to use powerd wh

Re: ZFS - poor performance with "large" directories

On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:11:54 +0100 Albert Cervin wrote about Re: ZFS - poor performance with "large" directories: AC> Will try a bit with the meta limit. You can also put metadata on a flash device to speed things up. To check if this is really the bottleneck in your case, something simple like

Re: ZFS - poor performance with "large" directories

On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:06:38 + krad wrote about Re: ZFS - poor performance with "large" directories: K> consumer SSDs are cheap enough now not to bother with usb drives I would K> imagine. Sure. I was just suggesting a USB drive as a quick way to check if this might help at all. Most people

Re: devd out of swap space ? (zfs arc related ?)

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 15:27:45 -0400 Mike Tancsa wrote about devd out of swap space ? (zfs arc related ?): > Anyone else seen anything like this on a recent RELENG11 STABLE ? I think I have seen something similar last week with a -stable from somewhen in March. Lots of processes crashed over night

re interface broken

Hi folks, I've got a notebook (HP/Compaq nx7010) with which I'm tracking 6-stable. Some days (maybe two weeks?) ago my internal network interface (re driver) became inoperational. The hardware shows a link, but nothing goes over the wire. I cannot ping, cannot get a dhcp address, nothing. Meanwhil

Re: re interface broken

On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:26:15 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: re interface broken: > > today, the interface still doesn't work. Is there work going on to > > fix this, can I provide further information to track this problem > I think you should show 'dmesg' and 'pciconf -

Re: re interface broken

On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 19:46:10 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: re interface broken: PY> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:0: class=0x02 card=0x08600e11 chip=0x813910ec PY> > rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' PY> > device = 'RT8139 (A/B/C/810x/813x/C+) F

Re: re interface broken

On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:58:11 +0200 Gerrit Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: re interface broken: GK> PY> Would you let me know a if_re.c revison number used to work on your GK> PY> system? GK> I have a working 6.1-stable kernel compiled on 12th of June, so I guess

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:24:15 +0200 glz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2: G> I have seen the watchdog and reset problem on a -STABLE laptop, both em G> and iwi. It only occur when I try to connect using Mulberry e-mail G> client so I thought it c

Re: FreeBSD 6.x, NIS, local root password, and nsswitch.conf

On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:07:34 -0500 (EST) Mark Hennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: FreeBSD 6.x, NIS, local root password, and nsswitch.conf: MH> I'm a bit unsure about it myself. MH> I tried exactly what you suggested, putting files on the compat line MH> and before nis for both passwd an

Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1->5.3

Hi folks, I recently updated my old Compaq Armada 1500c from 5.2.1 to 5-stable. 5.2.1 worked fine, the update went without any noticable problem according to the docs. 5.3 behaves well apart from a strange networking problem. The notebook lives in a /16 subnet with a /16 netmask and has a 16bit NE

Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1->5.3

>> I recently updated my old Compaq Armada 1500c from 5.2.1 to 5-stable. 5.2 >> worked fine, the update went without any noticable problem according to the >> docs. 5.3 behaves well apart from a strange networking problem. >> The notebook lives in a /16 subnet with a /16 netmask and has a 16bit >>

Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1->5.3

On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 13:19:13 + (GMT) Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1->5.3: RW> > arp things look ok, but I cannot ping the router, though I can ping RW> > any other host (the same thing I already noticed here at work). But RW> >

Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1->5.3

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:30:26 +1100 Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1->5.3: PJ> >ed0: flags=108843 mtu 1500 PJ> > inet 130.75.117.37 netmask 0x broadcast 130.75.255.255 PJ> > ether 01:d4:ff:03:00:20 PJ> That's a multicast MA

Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1->5.3

On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 03:36:53 -0700 (MST) "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1->5.3: MWL> : I will do so if it's the support for the cards that is broken. MWL> However, I : have tried 4 different cards now, and only one of them MWL> wo

Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1->5.3

On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:27:34 -0700 (MST) "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1->5.3: MWL> : Please tell me which information you need. MWL> You've likely already sent this before... But can you send a full MWL> dmesg with hw.cbb.debu

Re: suboptimal handling of accidentally pulled usb devices (5.4)

On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 07:00:38PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > This is on 5.4-PRERELEASE/i386, using ehci for the usb2 device. > More info available on request. I see exactly the same behaviour here with an iRiver iFP player on 5.4-STABLE/i386, and I'd appreciate improvements in this field,

Re: zfs on FreeBSD

On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:39:57 +0100 "Claus Guttesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: zfs on FreeBSD: CG> And that's when I'm once again is convinced that the CG> FreeBSD-ports-collection is one of the best package-repositories CG> around and hence was curious whether some people did actually u

Re: well-supported SATA RAID card?

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:30:48AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > The 3Ware cards work really well under FreeBSD. I have dozens I have > been using for some time and they work and work well. Highly > recommended. Over the years I am sure I have replaced a few dozen > dead drives and have not (kno

Re: NEC uPD 720100 USB 2.0 controller () not working on FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE i386 (2005-04-23)

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 02:04:29AM +0200, Raphael H. Becker wrote: > The NEC uPD 720100 USB 2.0 controller doesn's seem to work. This > controller is on a "Longshine LCS-8033H PCI USB Card" and is a > low cost "standard-USB2-controller" at my local electronics store. I wrote here about two wee

Trek Technology Thumbdrive 16MB

Hi folks, has anyone used the subject successfully with -stable? umass(4) mentions the 8MB version, so I thought 16MB should actually work, too. However, when I plug the device in, I just get ugen0: Trek Technology ThumbDrive, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 and no umass device. usbdevs shows port 3 add

Re: Trek Technology Thumbdrive 16MB

On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:23:51PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > > ugen0: Trek Technology ThumbDrive, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 > > and no umass device. > > Any hints how to make this work? > You _do_ have scsi disk support (device da) enabled in your kernel ? Yes, I do. I have two SCSI-Controllers

Re: Trek Technology Thumbdrive 16MB

On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > > You _do_ have scsi disk support (device da) enabled in your kernel ? > And loaded the umass module or have it in your kernel, for that matter ? Yes, of course. As I said before: I have working externel USB-HD, a working USB-MP3-Pla

Re: Trek Technology Thumbdrive 16MB

On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:28:57AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (May 04), Gerrit Khn said: > > port 3 addr 2: full speed, power 40 mA, config 1, ThumbDrive(0x), Trek > > Technology(0x0a16), rev 1.00, device ugen0 > umass only attaches to devices it recognizes. There are en

Re: Anyone with an ste(4) card?

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:46:49 -0400 John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Anyone with an ste(4) card?: JB> Is there anyone with an ste(4) ethernet adapter? I have some fixes to I have several of D-Link 550TX working here... JB> the locking for HEAD so that it runs without Giant and no one

nfs locking (was: Re: OOO 2.0 compiles but doesn't work properly)

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:29:02 -0500 Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about OOO 2.0 compiles but doesn't work properly: RH> > The home directory is coming from a nfs-server, so the user-setup RH> > should be identical. I already tried to delete .openoffice.org2, RH> > but that didn't help ei

<    1   2