> Am 16.04.2021 um 10:17 schrieb Ferdinand Goldmann :
>
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> It’s OK-ish most of the time here (CH).
>>
>> It does *NOT* work through a proxy, due to the use of pipelined
>> http-requests.
>>
>> What’s your internet-connection?
>
> The 10
So, am building a zpool on some encrypted discs - and what I have done
is to partition the disc with GPT add a single big partition, and
encrypt that. So the pool is on nda1p1.eli.
But I could, of course, encrypt the disc first, and then partition the
encrypted disc, or indded just put the zpo
I encrypt the whole disk and then add it to the pool. No need to partition it.
If I remember correctly zfs prefers unpartitioned disks.
\\Clay
> On 17 Apr 2021, at 21:54, Pete French wrote:
>
> So, am building a zpool on some encrypted discs - and what I have done is to
> partition the disc
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 1:53 PM Pete French
wrote:
> So, am building a zpool on some encrypted discs - and what I have done
> is to partition the disc with GPT add a single big partition, and
> encrypt that. So the pool is on nda1p1.eli.
>
> But I could, of course, encrypt the disc first, and the
On 4/17/2021 15:52, Pete French wrote:
So, am building a zpool on some encrypted discs - and what I have done
is to partition the disc with GPT add a single big partition, and
encrypt that. So the pool is on nda1p1.eli.
But I could, of course, encrypt the disc first, and then partition the
en
On Sat., Apr. 17, 2021, 1:04 p.m. Clayton Milos, wrote:
> I encrypt the whole disk and then add it to the pool. No need to partition
> it. If I remember correctly zfs prefers unpartitioned disks
>
ZFS on Solaris used to require the use of entire, raw disks as the cache
was disabled if the disk
Ferdinand Goldmann wrote (2021/04/15):
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that ever since update3.freebsd.org is gone (which was in Czech
> republic I think), FreeBSD updates are often quite slow for me (=
> Austria/Europe)
> Especially so for major release upgrades. In fact so slow that I have time
> to
On 2021-04-18 03:12:35 (+0800), Rainer Duffner wrote:
Am 16.04.2021 um 10:17 schrieb Ferdinand Goldmann
:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Rainer Duffner wrote:
It’s OK-ish most of the time here (CH).
It does *NOT* work through a proxy, due to the use of pipelined
http-requests.
What’s your intern
On 2021-04-18 08:51:05 (+0800), Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2021-04-18 03:12:35 (+0800), Rainer Duffner wrote:
I’m cc-ing clusteradm and dnsadmin, in hope that there’s somebody
there who can either fix it or take update4 out of the srv record…
I can take update4 out of the DNS if it's misbehaving c
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 10:51, Philip Paeps wrote:
>
>
> It looks like there were at least experiments with pointing
> freebsd-update at AWS, similar to how portsnap currently works. I will
> check if these experiments went anywhere and possibly point
> freebsd-update there instead.
>
The AWS fr
On 2021-04-18 13:57:45 (+0800), Jason Tubnor wrote:
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 10:51, Philip Paeps wrote:
It looks like there were at least experiments with pointing
freebsd-update at AWS, similar to how portsnap currently works. I
will
check if these experiments went anywhere and possibly p
11 matches
Mail list logo
