Re: fsck vs zvol

2019-06-12 Thread O'Connor, Daniel
> On 12 Jun 2019, at 15:47, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: >> Am 12.06.2019 um 03:04 schrieb O'Connor, Daniel : >> I have a small UFS partition that is the sysvol for Samba 4 (otherwise it >> doesn't work due to ACL issues). > > AFAIK this was fixed by iX Systems for Samba 4.9: > > https://j

Re: fsck vs zvol

2019-06-12 Thread Eugene Grosbein
12.06.2019 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >>> The Samba 4 ZFS is from https://wiki.freebsd.org/Samba4ZFS (which I wrote..) You should correct this page and change the line for /etc/fstab and use non-zero value for fsck pass number. ___ freebsd-stable@f

FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2019-06-09

2019-06-12 Thread Li-Wen Hsu
(Please send the followup discussions to freebsd-testing@ list.) FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2019-06-09 === Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period from 2019-06-03 to 2019-06-09. During this period, we have: * 2444 builds (92.9

Re: fsck vs zvol

2019-06-12 Thread O'Connor, Daniel
> On 12 Jun 2019, at 22:21, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > 12.06.2019 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > The Samba 4 ZFS is from https://wiki.freebsd.org/Samba4ZFS (which I wrote..) > > You should correct this page and change the line for /etc/fstab > and use non-zero value for fsck pas