On 4/6/2019 2:56 AM, Pete French wrote:
Something odd going on there there - I am using 12-STABLE and I have
igb just fine, and it attaches to the same hardware that 11 did:
I ran apache bench, and I got a result of 100 requests/sec on 12-STABLE
vs 16,000 requests/sec on 11-STABLE. So somethin
On 2019-04-06 08:58, Kris von Mach wrote:
> On 4/6/2019 2:56 AM, Pete French wrote:
>> Something odd going on there there - I am using 12-STABLE and I have
>> igb just fine, and it attaches to the same hardware that 11 did:
>
> I ran apache bench, and I got a result of 100 requests/sec on 12-STABL
On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 1:23 PM Michael Butler
wrote:
>
> On 2019-04-06 08:58, Kris von Mach wrote:
> > On 4/6/2019 2:56 AM, Pete French wrote:
> >> Something odd going on there there - I am using 12-STABLE and I have
> >> igb just fine, and it attaches to the same hardware that 11 did:
> >
> > I r
Not that it's at all relevant to the question here, but...
It does mostly work without em in the 12 kernel - I'm not sure how, but
it does.
I upgraded to 12-stable via source but didn't add em to my custom
kernel. Most things worked - basic network functionality. But I had
problems with ipfw
