Hi,
today’s latest 11.2 rev 341671, when booting off local disk all is fine, but
pxeboot gets stuck after printing
FreeBSD/x86 bootstrap loader. Revision 1.1
(Fri Dec 7 09:45:34 IST 2018 danny-pe-44)
-
older pxeboot get slightly further, but hang too.
older root images w
Hi Eugene!
In the sys/dev/vt/hw/efifb/efifb.c, starting from line 115, set of
initialized fields of "info" struct.
Like "info->fb_height = efifb->fb_height;".
"efifb" holds data passed by loader from UEFI firmware metadata.
There is fb_height, fb_width, fb_mask_(red|green|blue|reserved), fb_stride
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:38-0800, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> Can you please file a bug at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ and
> assign it to me?
See PR 233851.
--
Trond.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 12/6/18 4:19 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:48:35PM -0700, John Nielsen wrote:
>> Is aesni(4) even required if all you want is userland acceleration?
>>
> No, it is not. Same for rdrand_rng(4), if an application uses hw random
> source directly.
To elaborate furthe
On 05/12/2018 00:48, Toomas Soome wrote:
Yes, that must be true but it does not hurt to get checked.
And of course, lsdev -v from 11.x loader would be good too.
Anyhow, I am afraid we have reached to point where more specific debug info is
needed (printed out), with lack of output about disks
Caso nao esteja visualizando corretamente esta mensagem, acesse aqui.
| | |
CLIQUE AQUI E COMPRE AGORA
---|---
| | |
---|---|---
VANTAGENS DE TER SKY PRÉ-PAGO
| | | | |
---|---|---
O EQUIPAMENTO
É SEU POR APENAS
12X DE R$ 12,00
|
ESCOLHA SUA
PRO
On 18. 12. 6., Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I'm not subscribed to -stable.
>
> This is in response to jkim@'s messages here:
>
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2018-December/090202.html
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2018-December/090202.html
>
> Based on wh
On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 18:38 -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > So while OpenSSL now uses more of its own native C and assembly code
> > (e.g. for AES-NI support), and that's certainly faster than all the
> > overhead that cryptodev(4) brings with it (see jhb@'s post), I wonder:
> >
> > 1. What happens
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 06:38:04PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 18. 12. 6., Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > I'm not subscribed to -stable.
> >
> > This is in response to jkim@'s messages here:
> >
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2018-December/090202.html
> > https://lists.free
On 18. 12. 7., Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 06:38:04PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> On 18. 12. 6., Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> I'm not subscribed to -stable.
>>>
>>> This is in response to jkim@'s messages here:
>>>
>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2018-Dece
11 matches
Mail list logo