Re: Memory error logged in /var/log/messages

2018-11-20 Thread Alfred Bartsch
Am 19.11.18 um 14:10 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen: > Hi all, > > one of our production servers, 11.2p3 is logging this every couple of minutes: > > Nov 19 11:48:06 ph002 kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR (5) OVER MS channel 3 memory > error > Nov 19 11:48:06 ph002 kernel: MCA: Address 0x1f709a48c0 > Nov 19

plenty of memory, but system us intensively swapping

2018-11-20 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hello, I have a recent FreeBSD 11-STABLE which is mainly used as an iSCSI target. The system has 64G of RAM but is swapping intensively. Yup, about of half of the memory is used as ZFS ARC (isn't capped in loader.conf), and another half is eaten by the kernel, but it oly uses only about half

Re: plenty of memory, but system us intensively swapping

2018-11-20 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:53+0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hello, > > > I have a recent FreeBSD 11-STABLE which is mainly used as an iSCSI target. The > system has 64G of RAM but is swapping intensively. Yup, about of half of the > memory is used as ZFS ARC (isn't capped in loader.conf), and an

Re: plenty of memory, but system us intensively swapping

2018-11-20 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hello, On 20.11.2018 15:12, Trond Endrestøl wrote: On freebsd-hackers the other day, https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2018-November/053575.html, it was suggested to set vm.pageout_update_period=0. This sysctl is at 600 initially. ZFS' ARC needs to be capped, otherwise it will

Re: plenty of memory, but system us intensively swapping

2018-11-20 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:22+0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hello, > > On 20.11.2018 15:12, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > On freebsd-hackers the other day, > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2018-November/053575.html, > > it was suggested to set vm.pageout_update_period=0. This

Re: plenty of memory, but system us intensively swapping

2018-11-20 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hello, On 20.11.2018 16:22, Trond Endrestøl wrote: I know others have created a daemon that observe the ARC and the amount of wired and free memory, and when these values exceed some threshold, the daemon will allocate a number of gigabytes, writing zero to the first byte or word of every page,

Where is my memory on 'fresh' 11-STABLE? It should be used by ARC, but it is not used for it anymore.

2018-11-20 Thread Lev Serebryakov
I have server which is mostly torrent box. It uses ZFS and equipped with 16GiB of physical memory. It is running 11-STABLE (r339914 now). I've updated it to r339914 from some 11.1-STABLE revision 3 weeks ago. I was used to see 13-14GiB of memory in ZFS ARC and it was Ok. Sometimes it "locks"

Re: Where is my memory on 'fresh' 11-STABLE? It should be used by ARC, but it is not used for it anymore.

2018-11-20 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hello, 20.11.2018 15:42, Lev Serebryakov пишет: I have server which is mostly torrent box. It uses ZFS and equipped with 16GiB of physical memory. It is running 11-STABLE (r339914 now). I've updated it to r339914 from some 11.1-STABLE revision 3 weeks ago. I was used to see 13-14GiB of m

Re: Where is my memory on 'fresh' 11-STABLE? It should be used by ARC, but it is not used for it anymore.

2018-11-20 Thread Mark Johnston
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 03:42:24PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > I have server which is mostly torrent box. It uses ZFS and equipped > with 16GiB of physical memory. It is running 11-STABLE (r339914 now). > > I've updated it to r339914 from some 11.1-STABLE revision 3 weeks ago. > > I was

[no subject]

2018-11-20 Thread Netflix
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 04:26:53 + Subject: Aviso de bloqueio temporário - Conta ID: 04265321112018 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20181121042653.b7dc844...@help22.servicodeentrega.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D9C226DD72 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.23 / 15.00];