Now that we are on a faster upgrade policy for minor branches, it is expected
that we'll upgrade from 11.0 to 11.1 to 11.2 much faster than in the old days.
I can cope with that, but it appears that functional changes are also being
made within the stable branch as seen here:
https://bugs.freeb
Hi!
> Now that we are on a faster upgrade policy for minor branches, it is expected
> that we'll upgrade from 11.0 to 11.1 to 11.2 much faster than in the old
> days. I can cope with that, but it appears that functional changes are also
> being made within the stable branch as seen here:
>
> h
On 19/9/17 6:15PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Now that we are on a faster upgrade policy for minor branches, it is
>> expected that we'll upgrade from 11.0 to 11.1 to 11.2 much faster than in
>> the old days. I can cope with that, but it appears that functional changes
>> are also being made
On 19/09/2017 09:32, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 19/9/17 6:15PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Now that we are on a faster upgrade policy for minor branches, it is
>>> expected that we'll upgrade from 11.0 to 11.1 to 11.2 much faster than in
>>> the old days. I can cope with that, but it ap
Hi all,
> Am 19.09.2017 um 10:32 schrieb Aristedes Maniatis :
> Then we have a problem since
> https://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:11:x86:64/latest/All/ has been built on 11.1,
> not on 11.0 (I just tested it with csync2 which I know fails). Packages there
> may fail to run on 11.0, but there is no
On 09/19/2017 01:57, Tao Zhou wrote:
> On 18/9/17 5:40 pm, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
>> There is a known issue with the latest version of Asterisk 13.xxx
>> crashing. I don't know the root cause. Try downgrading the Asterisk
>> version. You probably should compile all code with debug flags enab
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183817
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|eu...@freebsd.org
Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> Ports are still being built according to the same policy -- on the
> earliest still-supported release of each major branch.
>
> It's just that now, for 11.x and subsequent, 11.0 goes out of support a
> month or so after 11.1-RELEASE comes out. You're meant to have upgra
On Sep 19, 2017 6:05 PM, "Aristedes Maniatis" wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> Ports are still being built according to the same policy -- on the
> earliest still-supported release of each major branch.
>
> It's just that now, for 11.x and subsequent, 11.0 goes out of support a
> month or so afte
On 20/9/17 11:33AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> FreeBSD has always had a policy of backwards compatibility. By that
> definition we are stable. What we don't promise is full forwards
> compatibility, which is what you are asking for.
Correct. Within the stable branch I'd always assumed forward compati
10 matches
Mail list logo
