On 23/01/2017 07:24, Sergei Akhmatdinov wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:57:46 -0800
Walter Parker wrote:
For decades there has always been a warning not to do parallel builds of
the kernel or the world (Linux kernel builds also suggest not to do this).
Every once in a while, I see people post ab
On 23/01/2017 06:57, Walter Parker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For decades there has always been a warning not to do parallel builds of
> the kernel or the world (Linux kernel builds also suggest not to do this).
>
> Every once in a while, I see people post about 5 minutes. This only way I
> can see this ha
Walter Parker writes:
> For decades there has always been a warning not to do parallel builds of
> the kernel or the world (Linux kernel builds also suggest not to do this).
>
> Every once in a while, I see people post about 5 minutes. This only way I
> can see this happening is by doing a parall
I have a pair of machines running hast cross two pairs of
drives - i.e. 4 drives total, two in each box, and hence
two hast resources, cbert0 and cebrt1.
Its been running mysql fir a long time, but there only 6 gig
of data actually in use in the pool. I rebuilt the secondary
machine, and wanted to
Partially answering my own question here, as it occured to
me that the zpool is scattering writes across the disc in 4k blocks,
but hast has a minimum extent size of 2meg by default. Thats eems like
a likely culprit for the 'dirty blocks' multiplcation I am seeing.
I shrunk down the extent size to
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Lowell Gilbert <
freebsd-stable-lo...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
> Walter Parker writes:
>
> > For decades there has always been a warning not to do parallel builds of
> > the kernel or the world (Linux kernel builds also suggest not to do
> this).
> >
> > Every once
