Re: NFS and amd on older FreeBSD

> On 12 Jan 2017, at 21:01, Karl Young wrote: > > Daniel Braniss(da...@cs.huji.ac.il)@2017.01.12 10:25:03 +0200: >> >>> On 12 Jan 2017, at 9:49 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: >>> >>> On 12 Jan 2017, at 1:47 AM, Karl Young wrote: I inherited a lab that has a few hundred hosts runn

pkg upgrade wants to install old postgresql-client-version. why?

Dear all, I have a little FreeBSD system upgraded from 10.2-p24 to 10.3-p11. GENERIC Kernel. This also included upgrading postgresql from 9.5.4 to 9.5.5_1. and about 220 other ports. Most were upgraded using pkg upgrade, but postgresql had to be upgraded using the manual make, make package, mak

Re: pkg upgrade wants to install old postgresql-client-version. why?

On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:24 AM, Holger Kipp wrote: > Dear all, > > I have a little FreeBSD system upgraded from 10.2-p24 to 10.3-p11. GENERIC > Kernel. > This also included upgrading postgresql from 9.5.4 to 9.5.5_1. and about 220 > other ports. > Most were upgraded using pkg upgrade, but postgre

Re: pkg upgrade wants to install old postgresql-client-version. why?

Dear Paul, Am 13.01.2017 um 15:49 schrieb Paul Mather mailto:p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>>: On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:24 AM, Holger Kipp mailto:holger.k...@alogis.com>> wrote: Dear all, I have a little FreeBSD system upgraded from 10.2-p24 to 10.3-p11. GENERIC Kernel. This also included upgrading po

pkg upgrade problem with Perl 5.24

Dear all, I upgraded Perl to 5.24(1.r4_1) (via pkg upgrade). When I now try to install the latest version from ports (1.r5_1), the system can’t install the new version because of the older version, but can’t deinstall(*) the older version (eg. via make deinstall && make reinstall). root@gw2:/

Re: pkg upgrade problem with Perl 5.24

On 2017/01/13 15:43, Holger Kipp wrote: > so currently via pkg upgrade I got perl5-5.24.1.r4_1, which perl itself > confirms: ^ > ===> Installing for perl5.24-5.24.1.r5_1 Notice the difference in package names. One is call

Re: pkg upgrade problem with Perl 5.24

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:43:41 + Holger Kipp wrote > Dear all, > > I upgraded Perl to 5.24(1.r4_1) (via pkg upgrade). > When I now try to install the latest version from ports (1.r5_1), the system > can’t install the new version because of the older version, but can’t > deinstall(*) the older

Re: pkg upgrade problem with Perl 5.24

On 2017/01/13 16:31, Chris H wrote: > As a general rule: > install from pkg(8) remove with pkg(8) > install from ports(7), remove with ports(7) > Sorry -- this is completely bogus. You can freely mix and match either way. Just make sure that the package names match up. In fact the ports removes

Re: pkg upgrade problem with Perl 5.24

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:38:59 + Matthew Seaman wrote > On 2017/01/13 16:31, Chris H wrote: > > As a general rule: > > install from pkg(8) remove with pkg(8) > > install from ports(7), remove with ports(7) > > > > Sorry -- this is completely bogus. Not entirely. > You can freely mix and mat

Re: pkg upgrade wants to install old postgresql-client-version. why?

On Jan 13, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Holger Kipp wrote: > Dear Paul, > >> Am 13.01.2017 um 15:49 schrieb Paul Mather > >: >> >> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:24 AM, Holger Kipp > > wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I have a little FreeBSD system u

stable/11 debugging kernel unable to produce crashdump

Hi! I'm struggling to debug a panic in 11.0-STABLE/i386 that successfully produces crashdump but I want more information. So I've rebuilt my custom kernel to include options INVARIANTS, WITNESS and DEADLKRES. Now any panic results in quick unclean reboot without crashdump generation. Serial cons

Re: stable/11 debugging kernel unable to produce crashdump

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 02:21:23AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Hi! > > I'm struggling to debug a panic in 11.0-STABLE/i386 that successfully > produces crashdump > but I want more information. So I've rebuilt my custom kernel to include > options INVARIANTS, WITNESS and DEADLKRES. Now any pan

Re: Can't boot on ZFS -- /boot/zfsloader not found

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: > On 12/01/2017 21:12, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > Hey Steven, > > (Please cc: me on reply) > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Steven Hartlan > > The reason I'd recommend 512k for boot is to provide room for expansion > moving forward, as re

Re: NFS and amd on older FreeBSD

Do you have exactly the same export options specified in /etc/exports for the 9.3 server as the 6.3 one? Beyond that, I can only suggest capturing packets when the automount fails and looking at them in wireshark to see what is actually happening. rick Fro

Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a command line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional streams of diagnostic: ELF binary type "3" not known. which seem to be related to building some linux packages (example below, parallel builds). Poudriere still report