Hello everyone,
we're trying to tackle a rare bug that is very hard to debug.
Our 10.3-RELEASE servers can panic boot and subsequently can come up
without network (2x - no carrier). We've seen this on 10.3-RELEASE-p0 we
have never seen this before.
root@storage ~ # pciconf -lv | grep -B3 network
I run an iscsi setup booting using ixpe, which I build on the
FreeBSD server. the last few steps of the build do this:
objcopy -O binary -R .zinfo bin/ipxe.pxe.tmp bin/ipxe.pxe.bin
objcopy -O binary -j .zinfo bin/ipxe.pxe.tmp bin/ipxe.pxe.zinfo
This runs fine on 10-STABLE, but on
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi All,
I ported the changes from projects/ipsec to stable/11 branch.
So, if it is more suitable for testing, please, welcome.
You can checkout the sources from github:
https://github.com/bu7cher/freebsd/tree/stable/11
Also I made the standalone patch:
https://people.freebsd.org
2017-01-07 23:38 GMT+01:00 Holger Kipp :
> Dear Fernando,
>
> > On 7 Jan 2017, at 23:27, Fernando Herrero Carrón
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am seeing a strange behaviour. I run freebsd-update fetch:
> >
> > % sudo freebsd-update fetch
> > Password:
> > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors...
I have MoBo (Supermicro X9SCL-F) with two 1G NICs, first one (em0) is
based on 82579LM, and second one (em1) is based on 82574L.
When I'm using em0 with simple config:
ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.134.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 9000"
ifconfig_em0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
everything works fin
Lev Serebryakov wrote
in <58756dde.5000...@freebsd.org>,<58756dde.5000...@freebsd.org>:
le>
le> I have MoBo (Supermicro X9SCL-F) with two 1G NICs, first one (em0) is
le> based on 82579LM, and second one (em1) is based on 82574L.
le>
le> When I'm using em0 with simple config:
le>
le> ifconfig_
I want to build a router that has 2 x 500mb/s radio ISP facing, 2 x
500mb/s radio's facing another site, plus a 1gb/s link to the LAN.
I plan to plug everything into a switch so I can have redundant routers.
So my question is should I go with 5 x 1GB NIC's or 2x10GB NIC's on
the motherboard. Ass
Hello Hiroki,
Wednesday, January 11, 2017, 2:43:28 AM, you wrote:
> What happens by typing the following command?
> % ping6 ff02::1%em1
% ping6 ff02::1%em1
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) fe80::225:90ff:fe24:6bf8%em1 --> ff02::1%em1
16 bytes from fe80::225:90ff:fe24:6bf8%em1, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0.
