On Aug 26 22:49, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/26/2016 6:38 AM, Matt Smith wrote:
Hi, I'm attempting to compile the latest stable/11 from a 12 day old
stable/10 system and I'm getting the following error. I've tried
completely deleting /usr/obj. I've tried without make -j. And I've tried
commenting
[I've no solid evidence of what the panic is tied to. OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=RELRO
ise is just what was new/unusual in the portmaster -DKa that was going on when
the rpi2 had the panic.]
The console history shows (the cc quoted just gives a ball park for where it
was in the binutils build):
> cc -D
On Aug 27 08:56, Matt Smith wrote:
I have not been running this build within script(1) though I am afraid
so I don't have a copy of the whole build. I might stop the build and
reenable all of the options again, but this time with a completely
empty ccache.
I just tried this, and it bombed ou
On 08/26/2016 05:17, lenz wrote:
> I run a X1 Carbon 4th gen and can report that the iwm driver now runs very
> reliable with RC2, reliable enough that I moved it back into loader.conf
> and did not see any panics after a bunch or reboots. Thanks for the good
> work on this :)
>
> cheers
> Lenz
>
Quick top post: retrying "portmaster -DKa" after rebooting did not repeat the
panic.
OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=RELRO likely has nothing to do with the unusual panic.
===
Mark Millard
markmi at dsl-only.net
On 2016-Aug-27, at 3:35 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
[I've no solid evidence of what the panic is ti
2016-08-25 13:29 GMT+02:00 Frederic Chardon :
>
> Le 23 août 2016 20:24, "Frederic Chardon" a
> écrit :
>>
>> 2016-08-23 19:35 GMT+02:00 Frederic Chardon :
>> > 2016-08-23 9:35 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Belousov :
>> >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:27:56AM +0200, Frederic Chardon wrote:
>> >>> Le 20 ao??
Hi,
Micheal did a plain compiler benchmark on FreeBSD 11:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd11-clang-gcc&num=1
It shows clearly how slow CLang is compared to GCC.
This is the price FreeBSD has to pay to be free of GPL in the base
system.
Erich
I’ve been having an issue for a few days on 11-stable (… maybe longer with
-current/-head in general) … especially with parallel makes (-j12) on amd64.
I wasn’t capturing the logs, so finally did, and looking back, the error
appears to be :
--- lib/libgeom__L ---
cc -fstack-protector-strong
El 28/8/2016 0:06, "Erich Dollansky" escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> Micheal did a plain compiler benchmark on FreeBSD 11:
>
>
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd11-clang-gcc&num=1
>
> It shows clearly how slow CLang is compared to GCC.
>
> This is the price FreeBSD has to pay to be f
> The problem here is that Phoronix took a Beta version of FreeBSD 11.
> Beta versions have a lot of debugging (malloc, invariants, witness)
> options enabled which make it significantly slower than release
> versions. This is even obviously when you run a Beta as a desktop. It
> just feels much sl
FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386 - Build #89 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386/89/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386/89/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-i386/89/console
FreeBSD_STABLE_11-arm64 - Build #92 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-arm64/92/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-arm64/92/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-arm64/92/conso
12 matches
Mail list logo
