Re: leapsecond file

On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:11+0900, Randy Bush wrote: > i get these on all fbsd 10.3 hosts > > Aug 7 04:13:06 cache0 ntpd[576]: leapsecond file > ('/var/db/ntpd.leap-seconds.list'): expired less than 68 days ago > > i have > > # grep ntp /etc/periodic.conf.local > # 480.leapfile-ntpd > daily_ntpd

unionfs bugs, a partial patch and some comments [Was: Re: 1-BETA3 Panic: __lockmgr_args: downgrade a recursed lockmgr nfs @ /usr/local/share/deploy-tools/RELENG_11/src/sys/fs/unionfs/union_vnops.c:190

Bezüglich Rick Macklem's Nachricht vom 07.08.2016 23:34 (localtime): > Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I had another crash which I'm quite sure was triggered by mount_unionfs: > Just in case you are not already aware, unionfs is always broken. Read > the BUGS > section at the end of "man

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-BETA4 Now Available

On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 09:05:26PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > o The new system hardening options have been fixed to avoid overwriting > other options selected during install time. Can those options also get added to "bsdconfig"? pgpOoPZAjr0vY.pgp Descript

Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0

On 08/07/16 06:55, Doug Hardie wrote: > Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might be > corrected to upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0? I have tried all the > beta's and none of them will do the upgrade even with the EN applied. > Bug 211398 has the details. According to the h

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #354

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-BETA4 Now Available

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:48:30AM +0200, Lars Engels wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 09:05:26PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > o The new system hardening options have been fixed to avoid overwriting > > other options selected during install time. > > Ca

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-BETA4 Now Available

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:44:05PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:48:30AM +0200, Lars Engels wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 09:05:26PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > > > o The new system hardening options have been fixed to avoi

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-BETA4 Now Available

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:15:07AM -0700, Devin Teske wrote: > > > On Aug 8, 2016, at 8:02 AM, Lars Engels wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:44:05PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:48:30AM +0200, Lars Engels wrote: > >>> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 09:05:26PM +,

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-BETA4 Now Available

> On Aug 8, 2016, at 8:02 AM, Lars Engels wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:44:05PM +, Glen Barber wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:48:30AM +0200, Lars Engels wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 09:05:26PM +, Glen Barber wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> o T

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-BETA4 Now Available

On 08/08/16 10:43, Lars Engels wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:15:07AM -0700, Devin Teske wrote: On Aug 8, 2016, at 8:02 AM, Lars Engels wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:44:05PM +, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:48:30AM +0200, Lars Engels wrote: On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 a

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] HEADS-UP: OpenSSH DSA keys are deprecated in 12.0 and 11.0

Which would you use? ECDSA? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_curve_cryptography "" In the wake of the exposure of Dual_EC_DRBG as "an NSA undercover operation", cryptography experts have also expressed concern over the security

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-BETA4 Now Available

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:53:26AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > On 08/08/16 10:43, Lars Engels wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:15:07AM -0700, Devin Teske wrote: > >>>On Aug 8, 2016, at 8:02 AM, Lars Engels wrote: > >>> > >>>On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:44:05PM +, Glen Barber wrote

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] HEADS-UP: OpenSSH DSA keys are deprecated in 12.0 and 11.0

The OpenSSH defaults are intentionally sane. RSA 2048 is anticipated to be fine for the next 10 years. It would not be a bad choice. I'm not aware of any reason not to use EC keys, and presumably the openssh authors wouldn't ship them as an option if they knew of any reason to believe they were

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-BETA4 Now Available

On 08/08/16 10:56, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:53:26AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 08/08/16 10:43, Lars Engels wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:15:07AM -0700, Devin Teske wrote: On Aug 8, 2016, at 8:02 AM, Lars Engels wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:44:05PM +000

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-BETA4 Now Available

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 11:22:27AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > On 08/08/16 10:56, Glen Barber wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:53:26AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > >> > >>On 08/08/16 10:43, Lars Engels wrote: > >>>On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:15:07AM -0700, Devin Teske wrote: > >>>

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] HEADS-UP: OpenSSH DSA keys are deprecated in 12.0 and 11.0

Hi Devin, This resource documents the choices pretty well I think https://stribika.github.io/2015/01/04/secure-secure-shell.html Author has made some modifications up to Jan 2016 https://github.com/stribika/stribika.github.io/commits/master/_posts/2015-01-04-secure-secure-shell.md The short answ

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #355

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] HEADS-UP: OpenSSH DSA keys are deprecated in 12.0 and 11.0

> On Aug 8, 2016, at 12:39 PM, Bernard Spil wrote: > > Hi Devin, > > This resource documents the choices pretty well I think > https://stribika.github.io/2015/01/04/secure-secure-shell.html > > Author has made some modifications

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #356

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #356

On 08/08/16 18:56, jenkins-ad...@freebsd.org wrote: > See > [...] Can someone please clarify for me the distinction between succeeding vs. failing and being stable vs. unstable? -- George ___ fr

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #357

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: unionfs bugs, a partial patch and some comments [Was: Re: 1-BETA3 Panic: __lockmgr_args: downgrade a recursed lockmgr nfs @ /usr/local/share/deploy-tools/RELENG_11/src/sys/fs/unionfs/union_vnops.c

Hi! > Since then I'm draging a minimal patch which prevents at least the > kernel panics for me. > Unfortunately I don't have the skills to continue Attilio Raos work. > > Just for anybody else needing unionfs: > https://people.freebsd.org/~attilio/unionfs_missing_insmntque_lock.patch Is this re

Re: unionfs bugs, a partial patch and some comments [Was: Re: 1-BETA3 Panic: __lockmgr_args: downgrade a recursed lockmgr nfs @ /usr/local/share/deploy-tools/RELENG_11/src/sys/fs/unionfs/union_vnops.c

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:02:00AM +0200, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > Bezüglich Rick Macklem's Nachricht vom 07.08.2016 23:34 (localtime): > > Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I had another crash which I'm quite sure was triggered by mount_unionfs: > > Just in case you are not alread