On 25/07/2016 07:36, Marko Cupać wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 19:25:23 +
> Glen Barber wrote:
>
>> Note to freebsd-update(8) consumers: An EN for earlier FreeBSD
>> releases is required before upgrading to 11.0-BETA2 will work
>> properly, so it is advised to wait until the ENs are published
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 08:06:30 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 25/07/2016 07:36, Marko Cupać wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 19:25:23 +
> > Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> >> Note to freebsd-update(8) consumers: An EN for earlier FreeBSD
> >> releases is required before upgrading to 11.0-BETA2 wil
Hello!
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 at 15:22:31 (+), FreeBSD Errata Notices wrote:
[...]
> 3) To update your system via a source code patch:
> The following patches have been verified to apply to the applicable
> FreeBSD release branches.
> a) Download the relevant patch from the location below, and
This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the
high-performance alternatives to sendmail
Question is this -- I have sshguard protecting connections inbound, but
Postfix appears to be ignoring it, which implies that it is not paying
attention to the hosts.allow file (and the w
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:07:55 +0200, George L. Yermulnik
wrote:
Hello!
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 at 15:22:31 (+), FreeBSD Errata Notices wrote:
[...]
3) To update your system via a source code patch:
The following patches have been verified to apply to the applicable
FreeBSD release branch
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
wrote:
This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the
high-performance alternatives to sendmail
Question is this -- I have sshguard protecting connections inbound, but
Postfix appears to be ignoring it, which implies th
On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
> wrote:
>
>> This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the
>> high-performance alternatives to sendmail
>>
>> Question is this -- I have sshguard protecting connections inbound, but
On Jul 25, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Karl Denninger
mailto:k...@denninger.net>> wrote:
On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
mailto:k...@denninger.net>> wrote:
This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the
high-performance alternat
On 07/25/2016 01:20 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
> ecently a large body of clowncars have been targeting my sasl-enabled
> https gateway (which I use for client machines and thus do in fact need)
> and while sshguard picks up the attacks and tries to ban them, postfix
> is ignoring the entries it make
On 7/25/2016 14:38, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 01:20 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
>> ecently a large body of clowncars have been targeting my sasl-enabled
>> https gateway (which I use for client machines and thus do in fact need)
>> and while sshguard picks up the attacks and tries to ban th
On 25-7-2016 19:32, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the
>>> high-performance alternatives to sendmail
>>>
>>> Question is this -- I
On 7/25/2016 14:48, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> On 25-7-2016 19:32, Karl Denninger wrote:
>> On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
>>> wrote:
>>>
This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the
high-performance alt
On 25-7-2016 21:53, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On 7/25/2016 14:48, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 25-7-2016 19:32, Karl Denninger wrote:
>>> On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
wrote:
> This may not belong in "stable", but sin
13 matches
Mail list logo
