Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #303

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:54:38 +0200, Karl Denninger wrote: Got a (nasty) surprise this afternoon on my sandbox machine. I was updating some Raspberry Pi2 machines which involved taking the sd card out, sticking it in an adapter and plugging it into the sandbox, then mounting the partition and

stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

Is the following something that should be updated something like is indicated below for 11.0-BETA1? Is kboot powerpc64 specific? # svnlite diff /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/Makefile Index: /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/Makefile === --- /usr

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #304

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On 7/11/2016 02:57, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:54:38 +0200, Karl Denninger > wrote: > >> Got a (nasty) surprise this afternoon on my sandbox machine. >> >> I was updating some Raspberry Pi2 machines which involved taking the sd >> card out, sticking it in an adapter and plugging i

Amazon nous ouvre ses portes, soyez les bienvenus

Découvrez la boutique Crêpes de France sur AmazonVoir la version en ligne http://v5vp.mjt.lu/nl2/v5vp/qqn.html?m=AEoAAEY-nZIiJlsAAAJpQ8QBLf0AAElOAAbDmABXg5XKmtkx9VrZQG2yd9XA58L48wAGeHc&b=9214d67c&e=6f246577&email=freebsd-stable@freebsd.org[http://v5vp.mjt.lu/img/v5vp/b/qhw/m2qh.jpeg][https

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 06:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 7/11/2016 02:57, Ronald Klop wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:54:38 +0200, Karl Denninger > > wrote: > > > > > Got a (nasty) surprise this afternoon on my sandbox machine. > > > > > > I was updating some Raspberry Pi2 machines which

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On 7/11/2016 08:32, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 06:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: >> On 7/11/2016 02:57, Ronald Klop wrote: >>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:54:38 +0200, Karl Denninger >>> wrote: >>> Got a (nasty) surprise this afternoon on my sandbox machine. I was updatin

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point and were for compatibility with pre-2.17.5 versions of binutils. Can you do a test build with the -CFLAGS+= -Wa,-mppc64bridge line removed? -Nathan On

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger wrote: > Here's the backtrace ... sounds like expected behavior, which is not-so > good all-in for a situation like this. I guess the strategy is to turn > off softupdates before attempting such an update so as not to crash the > host machine if th

freebsd-update fetch/install for 10.2-RELEASE => different kernel/userland patch versions?

Hi all, I currently issued freebsd-update fetch freebsd-update install and after reboot have freebsd-version -ku 10.2-RELEASE-p18 10.2-RELEASE-p19 Please note that kernel version is p18, userland p19. Is this intended behavior or is something broken with freebsd-update? System in question i

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On 7/11/2016 08:50, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger wrote: > >> Here's the backtrace ... sounds like expected behavior, which is not-so >> good all-in for a situation like this. I guess the strategy is to turn >> off softupdates before attempting such an u

Re: freebsd-update fetch/install for 10.2-RELEASE => different kernel/userland patch versions?

Hi! > I currently issued > > freebsd-update fetch > freebsd-update install > > and after reboot have > > freebsd-version -ku > 10.2-RELEASE-p18 > 10.2-RELEASE-p19 > > Please note that kernel version is p18, userland p19. > > Is this intended behavior or is something broken with freebsd-updat

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger > wrote: > > > Here's the backtrace ... sounds like expected behavior, which is > > not-so > > good all-in for a situation like this. I guess the strategy is to > > turn > > off softupdate

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #305

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On 7/11/2016 11:32, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger >> wrote: >> >>> Here's the backtrace ... sounds like expected behavior, which is >>> not-so >>> good all-in for a situation like this. I guess the

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 7/11/2016 11:32, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger < > > > k...@denninger.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Here's the backtrace ... sound

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On 7/11/2016 12:39, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: >> On 7/11/2016 11:32, Ian Lepore wrote: >>> On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger < k...@denninger.net> wrote: >>

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and > 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point and were > for compatibility with pre-2.17.5 versions of binutils. Can you do a test > build

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> >> It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and >> 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point and were >> for compatibility with pre

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:30 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> >>> It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and >>> 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obs

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #306

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

Quick top-post just to indicate that I just did gcc 4.2.1 based cross-builds for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc and TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 and they completed. They had analogous warnings to what clang (powerpc) and powerpc64-gcc (powerpc64) produced. I do not have a context to test powerpc64 or powerpc kbo

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 1:51 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > Quick top-post just to indicate that I just did gcc 4.2.1 based cross-builds > for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc and TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 and they completed. They > had analogous warnings to what clang (powerpc) and powerpc64-gcc (powerpc64) > produced.

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:44 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 7/11/2016 12:39, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > On 7/11/2016 11:32, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #307

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r302601 - in head/sys: arm/include arm64/include [__WCHAR_MAX definition mostly]

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2016-July/088998.html shows: > Modified: head/sys/arm/include/_types.h > == > --- head/sys/arm/include/_types.h Mon Jul 11 23:15:54 2016 > (r302600) > +++ head/sy

Re: svn commit: r302601 - in head/sys: arm/include arm64/include [__WCHAR_MAX definition mostly]

On 12.07.2016 5:44, Mark Millard wrote: > My understanding of the criteria for __WCHAR_MIN and __WCHAR_MAX: > > A) __WCHAR_MIN and __WCHAR_MAX: same type as the integer promotion of > ___wchar_t (if that is distinct). > B) __WCHAR_MIN is the low value for ___wchar_t as an integer type; not > neces