booting from separate zfs pool

Hi. So, I'm still struggling with my problem when I cannot boot from a big zfs 2T pool (I have written some messages about a year ago, the whole story is too long and irrelevant to retell it, I'll only notice that I took the path where I'm about to boot from a separate zfs pool closer to the begin

Re: booting from separate zfs pool

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:44:28PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: |So, I'm still struggling with my problem when I cannot boot from a big |zfs 2T pool (I have written some messages about a year ago, the whole |story is too long and irrelevant to retell it, I'll only notice that I |took the path w

Re: booting from separate zfs pool

I would not use the root dataset. Create a ROOT/ one so it looks for the kernel in "zboot:/ROOT/fist/boot/kernel/kernel" or similar. This way you are compatible with beadm. On 28 April 2016 at 08:44, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > So, I'm still struggling with my problem when I cannot boo

Re: booting from separate zfs pool

I think the new pivotroot type stuff in 11 may help a lot with this https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-10-2015-12.html#Root-Remount On 28 April 2016 at 10:31, Malcolm Herbert wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:44:28PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > |So, I'm still struggling

Re: booting from separate zfs pool

I thought that was in 10.3 as well? On 28/04/2016 11:55, krad wrote: I think the new pivotroot type stuff in 11 may help a lot with this https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-10-2015-12.html#Root-Remount On 28 April 2016 at 10:31, Malcolm Herbert wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at

Re: booting from separate zfs pool

On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:52:27 +0100 krad wrote: > I would not use the root dataset. Create a ROOT/ one so it looks for > the kernel in "zboot:/ROOT/fist/boot/kernel/kernel" or similar. This way > you are compatible with beadm. And of course, dataset zboot:/ROOT/fist in above example should set as

Re: booting from separate zfs pool

Finished at r293744 (MFC of r290548), right? https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-10/2016-January/007753.html On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:57:44 +0100 Steven Hartland wrote: > I thought that was in 10.3 as well? > > > On 28/04/2016 11:55, krad wrote: > > I think the new pivotroot t

Re: booting from separate zfs pool

And with this feature, if I understood correctly, old kernel keeps on running after this type of reboot. If so, kernel modules loaded via /etc/rc.conf[.local] can cause version mismatch with running kernel, forcing single user mode. So I'd prefer making 'zboot' pool as real rootfs and mount needed

Re: booting from separate zfs pool

On 28/04/2016 08:44, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > So, I'm still struggling with my problem when I cannot boot from a big > zfs 2T pool (I have written some messages about a year ago, the whole > story is too long and irrelevant to retell it, I'll only notice that I > took the path where I'm

Notice of appearance in Court #0000150054

Notice to Appear, This is to inform you to appear in the Court on the May 07 for your case hearing. Please, do not forget to bring all the documents related to the case. Note: The case will be heard by the judge in your absence if you do not come. The copy of Court Notice is attached to this ema

Jenkins build became unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #230

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"