On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:17:30 +0100
Daniel Bilik wrote:
> Should I create PR for this?
Created:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206231
--
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello everybody.
I just read the above security advisory. In the solution it says:
"This vulnerability can be fixed by modifying the permission on
/etc/bsnmpd.conf to owner root:wheel and permission 0600."
I guess it's a typo and the correct filename is /etc/snmpd.config,
right? There's no /etc
Prompted by recent security advisories I did a 'make buildworld'
on a fresh svn checkout, only to find out that it seems the 'exec'
mount flag on /usr/src is still required for a successful build.
This wasn't so for 10.2, and I hope it won't become a requirement
in 10.3 - or at least it should be
On Jan 14 12:40, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
Hello everybody.
I just read the above security advisory. In the solution it says:
"This vulnerability can be fixed by modifying the permission on
/etc/bsnmpd.conf to owner root:wheel and permission 0600."
I guess it's a typo and the correct filename
Where / What is the error?
The only example here was fixed in November.
On 1/14/2016 7:42 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Prompted by recent security advisories I did a 'make buildworld'
> on a fresh svn checkout, only to find out that it seems the 'exec'
> mount flag on /usr/src is still required fo
02:14:20.410159 IP 127.0.0.1.5423 > 127.0.0.1.80: Flags [S], seq 818919263, win
65535, options [mss 16344,nop,wscale 9,sackOK,TS val 749536482 ecr 0], length 0
02:14:20.410173 IP 127.0.0.1.80 > 127.0.0.1.5423: Flags [S.], seq 644693209,
ack 818919264, win 65535, options [mss 16344,nop,wscale 9,sa
On 01/15/16 at 02:48P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> 02:14:20.410159 IP 127.0.0.1.5423 > 127.0.0.1.80: Flags [S], seq 818919263,
> win 65535, options [mss 16344,nop,wscale 9,sackOK,TS val 749536482 ecr 0],
> length 0
> 02:14:20.410173 IP 127.0.0.1.80 > 127.0.0.1.5423: Flags [S.], seq 644693209,
>
FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #834 - Failure:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/834/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/834/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/834/console
Ch
On 2016-01-14 23:13, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Where / What is the error?
The only example here was fixed in November.
Here is how a fresh svn checkout on a 10-stable
fails in make buildworld when /usr/src is noexec :
CC='cc ' mkdep -f .depend.getprotoent_test -a
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/tests/net
CC: ngie
On 1/15/16, Mark Martinec wrote:
> On 2016-01-14 23:13, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> Where / What is the error?
>>
>> The only example here was fixed in November.
>
> Here is how a fresh svn checkout on a 10-stable
> fails in make buildworld when /usr/src is noexec :
>
>
> CC='cc ' mkdep -f .
FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #835 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/835/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/835/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/835/conso
FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #836 - Still Failing:
Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/836/
Full change log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/836/changes
Full build log:
https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/836/conso
Fascinating. The build is failing in ix(4), which was not touched by my change.
I suspect the actual problem is with r294061, which was a backport of ix(4).
Sean?
-Ravi
-Original Message-
From:
Date: 2016-01-14, Thursday at 22:14
To: , ,
,
Subject: FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386 - Build #83
13 matches
Mail list logo
