On 10/12/2015 05:38, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Beadm allows you to set the "next boot" and works as expected.
>
> You can't select from the boot loader but you can certainly ping-pong
> between a working and test environment easily (I do this all the time)
Being able to easily switch between BEs du
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183817
eu...@grosbein.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183817
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||mfc-stable9?, mfc-stable10?
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:15:10 -0600
Dustin Wenz wrote:
> Are you by chance using the ARC patch from this PR?
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187594
No (despite the fact that I would like to have it hit the tree).
> Do you have a vfs.zfs.dynamic_write_buffer tunable defined,
Michael B. Eichorn wrote:
>
> I sorry, but I really don't get your point, PCBSD has shown a great
> reason why zfs on root and on laptops/desktops is a good idea... boot
>
It has? As this is FreeBSD not PCBSD I must have missed that one...
> environments. They have pretty much figured out ho
On 12/10/2015 05:03, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:15:10 -0600
> Dustin Wenz wrote:
>
>> Are you by chance using the ARC patch from this PR?
>>
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187594
> No (despite the fact that I would like to have it hit the tree).
>
>>
On 12/10/2015 02:40, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 05:38, Karl Denninger wrote:
>> Beadm allows you to set the "next boot" and works as expected.
>>
>> You can't select from the boot loader but you can certainly ping-pong
>> between a working and test environment easily (I do this all the tim
Hi!
> I could be recalling wrongly but I'm pretty sure a number of emails have
> been seen on @freebsd.org lists that say, "don't use zfs on single
> spindle machines"
We do ZFS on single-spindle/SSD devices regularly. No problems
as of now.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 14:16 +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Michael B. Eichorn wrote:
> >
> > I sorry, but I really don't get your point, PCBSD has shown a great
> > reason why zfs on root and on laptops/desktops is a good idea...
> > boot
> >
>
> It has? As this is FreeBSD not PCBSD I must
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> ZFS has it's place, it is very good at some things, it brings features
> that people need.
> ZFS does not work (is not stable) on i386 without recompiling the
> kernel, but it is presented as an installation option.
> ZFS is compiled in by default in i386 kernels withou
On 2015-12-10 09:45, Michael B. Eichorn wrote:
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 14:16 +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Michael B. Eichorn wrote:
>
> I sorry, but I really don't get your point, PCBSD has shown a great
> reason why zfs on root and on laptops/desktops is a good idea...
> boot
>
It has? As
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183817
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||crash
--
You are receiving this m
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:29:03 -0600
Karl Denninger wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 05:03, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:15:10 -0600
> > Dustin Wenz wrote:
> >
> >> Are you by chance using the ARC patch from this PR?
> >>
> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18759
13 matches
Mail list logo