On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:43 AM, wrote:
> I am struggling on one field of a struct :
> http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/kern/kern_tc.c?v=FREEBSD10#L63
> I would like to understand what th_generation means please.
>
Seems to me you get a clue from: (
http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/kern/kern_tc.
At this time, re@ feels it is not necessary to have 10.2-BETA3 as part
of the release cycle, so the next 10.2 builds (planned to start in just
under 9 hours) will be 10.2-RC1.
The 10.2-RELEASE schedule has been updated on the FreeBSD.org website to
reflect this change, and is also included in this
Hi,
Currently I read more about timers and clock.
I am struggling on one field of a struct :
http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/kern/kern_tc.c?v=FREEBSD10#L63
I would like to understand what th_generation means please.
Thanks a lot
--
Jog
___
freebsd
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:38 AM, wrote:
> Is the maximum value for th_generation equal to 10 ?
> http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/kern/kern_tc.c?v=FREEBSD10#L77
>
I don't think those relate to generations. Generations change on every
clock tick; the multiple timehands structs relate to forcibly
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 10:59 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:38 AM, wrote:
>
> > Is the maximum value for th_generation equal to 10 ?
> > http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/kern/kern_tc.c?v=FREEBSD10#L77
> >
>
> I don't think those relate to generations. Generations chang
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>> ..uh top quoting..
>>
>> Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot/ROOT/default [].
>>
>> Fatal double fault:
>> eip = 0xc0b416f5
>> esp = 0xe2673000
>> ebp = 0xe2673008
>> cpuid =0; apic id = 00
>> panic: double fault
>> cpuid = 0
>> KDB stack backtrace:
>> #0 0xc0b72832 at kdb_backtrace+0x52
>> #1
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:40:42PM -0400, Jason Unovitch wrote:
> >> ..uh top quoting..
> >>
> >> Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot/ROOT/default [].
> >>
> >> Fatal double fault:
> >> eip = 0xc0b416f5
> >> esp = 0xe2673000
> >> ebp = 0xe2673008
> >> cpuid =0; apic id = 00
> >> panic: double fault
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/23/15 16:21, Stari Karp wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I had a problems with FreeBSD 10.2-BETA2. I used freebsd-update
> ugrade and update FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE. Is it possible to downgrade
> BETA2 to 10.1-RELEASE with freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.1-RELEASE,
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:48:06 + Glen Barber wrote
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:40:42PM -0400, Jason Unovitch wrote:
> > >> ..uh top quoting..
> > >>
> > >> Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot/ROOT/default [].
> > >>
> > >> Fatal double fault:
> > >> eip = 0xc0b416f5
> > >> esp = 0xe2673000
> >
Glen Barber wrote:
>
> ZFS on i386 requires KSTACK_PAGES=4 in the kernel configuration to work
> properly, as noted in the 10.1-RELEASE errata (and release notes, if
> I remember correctly).
>
> We cannot set KSTACK_PAGES=4 in GENERIC by default, as it is too
> disruptive.
Why?
> If you are usi
Hi!
I had a problems with FreeBSD 10.2-BETA2. I used freebsd-update ugrade
and update FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE.
Is it possible to downgrade BETA2 to 10.1-RELEASE with freebsd-update
upgrade -r 10.1-RELEASE, please?
Thank you.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.or
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:19:20AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> > ZFS on i386 requires KSTACK_PAGES=4 in the kernel configuration to work
> > properly, as noted in the 10.1-RELEASE errata (and release notes, if
> > I remember correctly).
> >
> > We cannot set KSTACK_PA
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:19:20AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Why is zfs on i386 so hard?
zfs is a resource hog. i386 is not able to handle the demand as well
as amd64.
I have never, ever, heard of anyone who has a deep understanding of
zfs on FreeBSD recommend anything other than amd64.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> zfs is a resource hog. i386 is not able to handle the demand as well
> as amd64.
>
Even amd64 is no guarantee. I installed one of the Illumos spinoffs on a
2GB amd64 netbook (they mostly force zfs). I think it lasted 2 days before
the kerne
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:43:43AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM.
The only correct answer to "how much RAM do you need to run ZFS" is
"always more" AFAICT.
mcl
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.or
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:42:44PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
>
> > zfs is a resource hog. i386 is not able to handle the demand as well
> > as amd64.
> >
>
> Even amd64 is no guarantee. I installed one of the Illumos spinoffs on a
> 2GB
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > Even amd64 is no guarantee. I installed one of the Illumos spinoffs on a
> > 2GB amd64 netbook (they mostly force zfs). I think it lasted 2 days
> before
> > the kernel panics started.
> >
>
> Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:44:43PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:43:43AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> > Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM.
>
> The only correct answer to "how much RAM do you need to run ZFS" is
> "always more" AFAICT.
>
Th
Glen Barber wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:44:43PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:43:43AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
>>
>>> Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM.
>>>
>> The only correct answer to "how much RAM do you need t
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:54:00AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:44:43PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:43:43AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> >>
> >>> Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less tha
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:00:03 + Glen Barber wrote
..
> FreeBSD kernel grew since 10.1-RELEASE, so this is not unexpected.
Not trying to hijack the thread, or anything.
But on that note; does FreeBSD keep a graph, or anything that indicates
kernel [size] over major versions?
I'm sure I'm not th
I have submitted a patch to the distributed ntp.conf to enable ntpd pool
client functionality. This was not possible in the ancient version of
ntpd shipped with FreeBSD releases over the past several years.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201803
Essentially this gives you a l
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Don Lewis wrote:
> Should r282973 and r283060 be MFCed to FreeBSD 10? On amd64 and i386,
> which use clang as their base compiler and don't have gcc in base by
> default, the math/scilab port uses clang for cc and c++ compilation, but
> finds /usr/include
24 matches
Mail list logo
