Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

2015-05-23 Thread Ian Smith
On Fri, 22 May 2015 20:26:40 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > > On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:28:49 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Ivan Klymenko wrote: [..] > >> Try changing the options in /boot/device.hints >

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

2015-05-23 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > On Fri, 22 May 2015 20:26:40 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:28:49 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Ivan Klymenko wrote:

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

2015-05-23 Thread Ian Smith
On Sat, 23 May 2015 14:01:16 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > > On Fri, 22 May 2015 20:26:40 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > > > > On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:28:49 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wro

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

2015-05-23 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > On Sat, 23 May 2015 14:01:16 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 May 2015 20:26:40 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Ian Smith > wrote: >

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

2015-05-23 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hm, no thermal monitoring and no speedstep. Could be dangerous/fun. What's the output of sysctl dev.cpu.0 ? -adrian On 23 May 2015 at 07:40, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Ian Smith wrote: >> On Sat, 23 May 2015 14:01:16 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >> > On Sat,

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

2015-05-23 Thread Ian Smith
On Sat, 23 May 2015 17:40:26 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Ian Smith wrote: [..] > > > It's an Intel Atom running amd64 version of FreeBSD stable/10: > > > > > > FreeBSD firewall.rdnzl.info 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #1 > > > r283292: Sat May 23 01:0

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

2015-05-23 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > On Sat, 23 May 2015 17:40:26 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > [..] > > > > It's an Intel Atom running amd64 version of FreeBSD stable/10: > > > > > > > > FreeBSD firewall.rdnzl.info 10.1

Re: L2ARC degraded. Checksum errors, I/O errors

2015-05-23 Thread George Kontostanos
Once again, do we know if this https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198242 has been committed yet? -- George Kontostanos --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

2015-05-23 Thread Adrian Chadd
Frequency control may not be relevant on that platform. Try installing the intel-pcm package; then # kldload cpuctl # pcm.x 1 Then paste some of that in here. Let's see if the CPU is idling some other way. -adrian ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mail

Re: Status of NFS4.1 FS_RECLAIM in FreeBSD 10.1?

2015-05-23 Thread Mahmoud Al-Qudsi
> On May 21, 2015, at 8:19 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Well, if you are just doing an NFSv4.1 mount, you could capture > packets during the failed mount attaempt with tcpdump and then > email me the raw packet capture, I can take a look at it. > (tcpdump doesn't handle nfs packets well, but wire

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

2015-05-23 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Frequency control may not be relevant on that platform. > > Try installing the intel-pcm package; then > > # kldload cpuctl > # pcm.x 1 > > Then paste some of that in here. Let's see if the CPU is idling some other > way. > > > > -adrian Fi