Re: Please help with cleaning up an accident on 9.0 release

2015-05-20 Thread Lars Engels
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:23:56AM -0800, Royce Williams wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Ulrich Drolshagen > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I brought myself in real trouble with a really important 9.0 release > > system (9.0-RELEASE-p4). It's amd64. By accident I deleted the following > >

Re: table with bug in ipfw

2015-05-20 Thread Alexander V . Chernikov
19.05.2015, 03:22, "Marcelo Gondim" : > Hi all, Hi, > > I see that there is still the following bug in ipfw: > > # ipfw table 33 add 0.0.0.0/8 > # ipfw table 33 list > ::/8 0 > > and > > # ipfw table 33 add 255.255.255.255 > # ipfw table 33 list > ::/8 0 > > The IP 255.255.255.255 not appear but it

L2ARC degraded. Checksum errors, I/O errors

2015-05-20 Thread George Kontostanos
Hello, Appologies if that has been asked before. I was wondering if the following bug has been addressed so far: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198242 Thanks -- George Kontostanos --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list htt

Re: L2ARC degraded. Checksum errors, I/O errors

2015-05-20 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:17:44PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote: > Hello, > > Appologies if that has been asked before. I was wondering if the following > bug has been addressed so far: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198242 As I know kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.l2_cksum_bad:

Re: L2ARC degraded. Checksum errors, I/O errors

2015-05-20 Thread Karli Sjöberg
Den 20 maj 2015 7:50 em skrev Slawa Olhovchenkov : > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:17:44PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Appologies if that has been asked before. I was wondering if the following > > bug has been addressed so far: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: L2ARC degraded. Checksum errors, I/O errors

2015-05-20 Thread George Kontostanos
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote: > > Den 20 maj 2015 7:50 em skrev Slawa Olhovchenkov : > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:17:44PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Appologies if that has been asked before. I was wondering if the > following > > >

Re: L2ARC degraded. Checksum errors, I/O errors

2015-05-20 Thread Karli Sjöberg
Den 20 maj 2015 9:40 em skrev George Kontostanos : > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote: >> >> >> Den 20 maj 2015 7:50 em skrev Slawa Olhovchenkov : >> > >> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:17:44PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote: >> > >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > Appologies if

Status of NFS4.1 FS_RECLAIM in FreeBSD 10.1?

2015-05-20 Thread Mahmoud Al-Qudsi
Hello, I have not delved too deeply into either the NFS spec or the FreeBSD nfsd code, but from my admittedly-limited understanding, it seems that reclaim is both a mandatory feature and one that is present in the current FreeBSD NFS v4.1 implementation. Is my understanding of this correct? My re

Will iSAT's ALMMS improve my ADSL speed? MailRef#B4-2066030#

2015-05-20 Thread iSAT
Wed 20 May 2015 ADSL Internet access speed is a very common search used in Google and other search engines. It is also regularly hotly debated on Internet forums. Clearly it is a common concern. Assisting to r

Re: Status of NFS4.1 FS_RECLAIM in FreeBSD 10.1?

2015-05-20 Thread Rick Macklem
Mahoud Al-Qudsi wrote: > Hello, > > I have not delved too deeply into either the NFS spec or the FreeBSD > nfsd > code, but from my admittedly-limited understanding, it seems that > reclaim is > both a mandatory feature and one that is present in the current > FreeBSD NFS > v4.1 implementation. Is

Re: Status of NFS4.1 FS_RECLAIM in FreeBSD 10.1?

2015-05-20 Thread Mahmoud Al-Qudsi
On May 20, 2015, at 8:57 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Only the global RECLAIM_COMPLETE is implemented. I'll be honest that > I don't even really understand what the "single fs reclaim_complete" > semantics are and, as such, it isn't implemented. Thanks for verifying that. > I think it is meant to b