Release schedule

Dear community, I have a question regarding the scheduling of releases. All of my production machines are currently running releng/10.1. This release has at least two severe (for me) problems: - An external USB 3.0 HD enclosure never negotiates successfully for USB 3.0 when connected. This worked

Re: epair on 9-stable

> On 31 Mar 2015, at 21:31 , Johannes Totz wrote: > > Hi, > > Is epair (virtual ethernet) supposed to work on 9-stable? > I'm having trouble with it. > I want to connect one end to a bridge, e.g.: > > bge0 <===> bridge0 <===> epair0a <---> epair0b > > and run dhclient on epair0b. > But nothin

pkgng cannot fetch from PACKAGESITE with nanobsd.sh in FreeBSD 10.1

Hi, 1. In order to comply with the pkgng in FreeBSD 10.1, the following changes were appended to my customized nanobsd.conf: customize_cmd cust_NANOBSD_setup > > cust_NANOBSD_packages() { > chroot ${NANO_WORLDDIR} sh -c 'cd packages; pkg; pkg install nano; pkg > clean;' > } > > customize_cmd cust

Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

Excerpt from Baptiste Daroussin: - Initial support for OS X - Initial support for NetBSD/EdjeBSD How would pkg-1.5.0 integrate with NetBSD pkgsrc? I didn't think there were any plans to port FreeBSD ports to NetBSD. Or is such a plan in the works? EdjeBSD should be EdgeBSD. A little spelling

Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:48:27AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Excerpt from Baptiste Daroussin: > > - Initial support for OS X > - Initial support for NetBSD/EdjeBSD > > How would pkg-1.5.0 integrate with NetBSD pkgsrc? > > I didn't think there were any plans to port FreeBSD ports to NetBSD.

Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

On 1 Apr 2015, at 05:03, Rui Paulo wrote: > > That is expected. WITH_PKG=devel is a make(1) option that only affects ports > (non-binary pkgs). Are you sure? I have it in make.conf on one of my systems where I never build ports manually (and don't even have a ports tree installed) and there

Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 01:56:38PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 1 Apr 2015, at 05:03, Rui Paulo wrote: > > > > That is expected. WITH_PKG=devel is a make(1) option that only affects > > ports (non-binary pkgs). > > Are you sure? I have it in make.conf on one of my systems where I never

Daniel Kelles invited you to check out Dropbox

Hi there, Daniel Kelles wants you to try Dropbox! Dropbox lets you bring all your photos, docs and videos with you anywhere and share them easily. Get started here. https://www.dropbox.com/l/s6jN8bqyJT9Q0CzL3huhhr?text=1 Thanks! - The Dropbox Team __

Re: Trying to clone a ZFS drive, can't get ashift=12

On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Peter Wemm wrote: On Wednesday, April 01, 2015 12:30:46 AM Daniel Eischen wrote: I have an Oracle (nee Sun) X4-2 server with identical 300GB SAS drives. I did an MBR ZFS install from FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE CD and have it updated to p6: [..] # zpool create -o cachefile=/

Jenkins build is back to normal : FreeBSD_stable_9 #730

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"