Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2

2013-10-11 Thread Pete French
> If the device on the secondary node does not supports DELETE, but the > device on the primary does, HAST will report to ZFS that DELETE > succeeded (although it failed on the secondary), and ZFS will not > disable TRIM. Pete, isn't this your case? Afraid not, both machines are running normal "sp

Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2

2013-10-11 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:27:36AM +0100, Pete French wrote: > > If the device on the secondary node does not supports DELETE, but the > > device on the primary does, HAST will report to ZFS that DELETE > > succeeded (although it failed on the secondary), and ZFS will not > > disable TRIM. Pete, is

Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2

2013-10-11 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 01:42:39PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > You showed only "Remote request failed" errors from your logs. Do you > have "Local request failed" errors too? You should also see them in "local errors" statistics from `hastctl list' output. -- Mikolaj Golub ___

Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2

2013-10-11 Thread Pete French
> You showed only "Remote request failed" errors from your logs. Do you > have "Local request failed" errors too? Yes, I have both - heres a fragment of the log: Oct 9 11:06:47 serpentine-active hastd[1502]: [serp0] (primary) Remote request failed (Operation not supported): DELETE(8594203648, 2

Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2

2013-10-11 Thread Pete French
> You should also see them in "local errors" statistics from `hastctl > list' output. Unfortunately I think those couters were reset when the machine panicd - they are all showing as zero. -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2

2013-10-11 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Pete French" If the device on the secondary node does not supports DELETE, but the device on the primary does, HAST will report to ZFS that DELETE succeeded (although it failed on the secondary), and ZFS will not disable TRIM. Pete, isn't this your case?

Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2

2013-10-11 Thread Pete French
> What do you see from: > sysctl kstat.zfs.misc.zio_trim > > You should be seeing none zero unsupported and zero failed. If this is > not the case its likely hast isnt setting bio_error to ENOTSUP. Again, unfortunately, the systems are now running with trim diisabled so these statsitcs have all be

ZFS devd messages

2013-10-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
Hi, It seems that the ZFS messages no longer match entries in devd.conf, eg.. notify 10 { match "system" "ZFS"; match "type""vdev"; action "logger -p kern.err 'ZFS: vdev failure, zpool=$pool type=$type'"; }; Doesn't match anything because messages now l

Re: ZFS devd messages

2013-10-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 12/10/2013, at 11:21, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Doesn't match anything because messages now look like.. > Processing event '!system=ZFS subsystem=ZFS type=resource.fs.zfs.removed > version=0 class=resource.fs.zfs.removed pool_guid=469710819 > vdev_guid=215223839' > > Does anyone have an upd