on 07/08/2013 00:26 J David said the following:
> $ sudo ./bootparttest da2
> GEOM provider "da2" opened
> Mediasize: 1000204886016 Bytes (1953525168 sectors)
> Sectorsize: 512 Bytes
> da2: read 1 blocks from the offset 0 [+0]
> da2: read 1 blocks from the offset 1 [+0]
> ptable_open: PMBR detected
on 18/07/2013 20:44 George Hartzell said the following:
> Andriy Gapon writes:
> > on 17/07/2013 23:47 George Hartzell said the following:
> > > How should I move forward with this?
> >
> > Could you please try to reproduce this problem using a kernel built with
> > INVARIANTS options?
>
> I
On 2013/08/06 05:15, Dave Mischler wrote:
I have an i5-2500 machine 8GB RAM now running 9.2-RC1 amd64 with the
GENERIC kernel. Today, while still running 9.2-BETA2, I updated my
source tree and started building world with idprio 31 and I looked back
a while later and all the CPU cores and disk we
on 06/08/2013 00:15 Dave Mischler said the following:
> I have an i5-2500 machine 8GB RAM now running 9.2-RC1 amd64 with the
> GENERIC kernel. Today, while still running 9.2-BETA2, I updated my
> source tree and started building world with idprio 31 and I looked back
> a while later and all the CPU
On 07.08.2013 01:26, J David wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> looking to your `zfs status` output and this, we can see, that GPT
>> wasn't detected on most of disks. Can you try to boot with this loader:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ae/zfsloader
>> It's from 10
> De : owner-freebsd-wirel...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> wirel...@freebsd.org] De la part de Oliver Pinter
> Envoyé : mardi 6 août 2013 16:56
> À : freebsd-wirel...@freebsd.org; sta...@freebsd.org
> Cc : adr...@freebsd.org
> Objet : wireless networking probelm with WEP
>
> Hi All!
Hell
On 8/7/13, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>> De : owner-freebsd-wirel...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>> wirel...@freebsd.org] De la part de Oliver Pinter
>> Envoyé : mardi 6 août 2013 16:56
>> À : freebsd-wirel...@freebsd.org; sta...@freebsd.org
>> Cc : adr...@freebsd.org
>> Objet : wireless networkin
TB --- 2013-08-07 08:55:22 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-08-07 08:55:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2013-08-07 0
Hello :-)
I am installing the 9.2-RC1 bootonly iso which wants to download stuff from
snapshots while it is in releases directory:
Installer wants to get 9.2-RC1 stuff from here (where it is missing):
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/i386/
While the stuff is at:
ftp://ftp.freeb
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:43:49PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 06/08/2013 22:28, Thomas Laus wrote:
> > I like the 'sendmail from ports' suggestion a little better. Going this
> > route, I only need to make configuration changes to /etc/mail/mailer.conf
> > once. All subsequent freebsd-up
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:18:41PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
> Hello :-)
>
> I am installing the 9.2-RC1 bootonly iso which wants to download stuff from
> snapshots while it is in releases directory:
>
> Installer wants to get 9.2-RC1 stuff from here (where it is missing):
>
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:18:41PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
>> I am installing the 9.2-RC1 bootonly iso which wants to download stuff from
>> snapshots while it is in releases directory:
>
> Ugh. I'll get this fixed as soon as possible.
> Thank yo
On 07/08/2013 15:19, Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:43:49PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 06/08/2013 22:28, Thomas Laus wrote:
>>> I like the 'sendmail from ports' suggestion a little better. Going this
>>> route, I only need to make configuration changes to /etc/ma
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:48:58PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:18:41PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
> >> I am installing the 9.2-RC1 bootonly iso which wants to download stuff from
> >> snapshots while it is in releases directo
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> Some mirrors have already begun to pick up the change.
> Sorry for the inconvenience. It was my fault. :(
> Glen
Naah, this is still 9.2-RC1 for testing, important that 9.2-RELEASE
gets fine :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.inf
On 08/07/2013 04:09, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 06/08/2013 00:15 Dave Mischler said the following:
>> I have an i5-2500 machine 8GB RAM now running 9.2-RC1 amd64 with the
>> GENERIC kernel. Today, while still running 9.2-BETA2, I updated my
>> source tree and started building world with idprio 31 and
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:02:14PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 07/08/2013 15:19, Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:43:49PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >> On 06/08/2013 22:28, Thomas Laus wrote:
> >>> I like the 'sendmail from ports' suggestion a little better. Goi
I have been using 9-STABLE as a guest under KVM on RHEL 6 for several months
now without incident. I am using the virtio drivers and using bridged
networking on the host to attach my guests.
Recently, I enabled pf in one of my 9-STABLE (r253579) guests and subsequently
started to receive inter
> I found a problem in new FreeBSD 9.2-{BETA2,RC1} which uses Sendmail-8.14.7.
> If you try to send email from FreeBSD 9.2 in IPv4 network with MS DNS
> you won't receive it.
> But in same time email passes from FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE which uses
> Sendmail-8.14.5.
The recent release made the followin
Hey :-)
I have just installed FreeBSD 9.2-RC1 on Dell Latitude D620 i386
laptop. After first run and installation of some packets with pkg(ng)
then some xorg configuration when I was in console it hung badly with
totally no response. This looks bad :-(
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Tngr7YpP_I
No crashdump was made, I was on second console so I dont know what
happened exactly, no backtrace, nothing, sorry :-(
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Hi list,
With a 9.1 system and the following:
/etc/sysctl.conf:
security.jail.mount_allowed=1
security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed=1
security.jail.enforce_statfs=1
zfs set jailed=on Pool
zfs jail 1 Pool
jexec 1 tcsh
jail1# zfs create Pool/test1
jail1# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOU
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 01:09:08PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> /src/sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c: In function 'db_show_sysregs':
> /src/sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c:1226: error: 'MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
Should be fixed with the r254066, sorry for the br
Hello,
I went through my local patches against base/releng/, 9.2 in that case.
There are some fixes which are noct in 9.2-RC1:
- Regarding kerberized builds:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2011-April/043902.html
- Regarding mfi and >2TB corruption, seems MFC reminder failed
htt
On 8/7/2013 12:05 PM, Gregory Shapiro wrote:
>> I found a problem in new FreeBSD 9.2-{BETA2,RC1} which uses Sendmail-8.14.7.
>> If you try to send email from FreeBSD 9.2 in IPv4 network with MS DNS
>> you won't receive it.
>> But in same time email passes from FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE which uses
>> Sen
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Could you please hack gpt_checkhdr() in sys/boot/common/part.c to print all
> the
> relevant values for this check and try bootparttest again?
Your wish is my command:
--- common/part.c.orig 2013-08-05 19:00:49.536868414 +
+++ common/pa
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> can you please dump first 34 blocks from da2 and send to me?
Will send off-list.
> Also, it is interesting, what tool did you use for partitioning?
Unfortunately I'm not sure. This pool may have been created on
Solaris. Seems like may
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:59 AM, J David wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Could you please hack gpt_checkhdr() in sys/boot/common/part.c to print all
>> the
>> relevant values for this check and try bootparttest again?
[..]
> So it looks like this check is tripping
Andriy Gapon writes:
> on 18/07/2013 20:44 George Hartzell said the following:
> > Andriy Gapon writes:
> > > on 17/07/2013 23:47 George Hartzell said the following:
> > > > How should I move forward with this?
> > >
> > > Could you please try to reproduce this problem using a kernel bui
H i@list,
i have a simple wuestion caused by a "device loss".
is there a special routine for unplugging usb-storage devices?
in the meaning:
may be settle some commends before unplugging the device
other than umount.
according to the handbook there ist no special routine.
unmounting should be eno
About all you need to do is add a "V4: ..." line to your /etc/exports
and then set nfsv4_server_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf and reboot.
On the client mount, you need to add "nfsv4" as a mount option.
I had to enable the proper daemons and mount on the client from the
actual server mount point (p
31 matches
Mail list logo