On 2013-07-10 00:50, J David wrote:
With SVN version r253119, we are seeing strange errors from iostream while
attempting to use the new clang 3.3 with libc++ on 9-STABLE.
...
/tmp/example-fet9b9.o: In function `std::__1::basic_ostream >& std::__1::operator<<
>(std::__1::basic_ostream >&, char
Hello Chris
On 09.07.2013 20:24, Chris H wrote:
Greetings Fabian, and thank you for your reply.
You're welcome.
My perl5 tree currently looks like:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12/man/
man3/
whatis
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.4/
man3/
whatis
What a mess!
If only whatis is left below 5.12.4, then y
Hi --
[Upcoming code freeze in stable]
On 2013-04-13 22:15, Michael Grimm wrote:
On 13.04.2013, at 14:29, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
[great deal of simplification by ipv6_addrs_IF]
Sorry to resurrect this thread but since nothing has happened in about
three months I have to ask: What can I do
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm
wrote:
Will that patch make it into 9.2? If I am not mistaken, that patch isn't
in stable yet.
I would also like to see this patch hit 9.x sooner than later. It's so
painful when someone forgets to fix the alias numbering on servers with
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm <
> trash...@odo.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Will that patch make it into 9.2? If I am not mistaken, that patch isn't
>> in stable yet.
>>
>
> I would also like to see this patch hit 9.x sooner t
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> I missed one additional patch, which I imported in r253042.
>
Yes, I pulled that rev into my -STABLE and rebuilt and it is fine now.
Thanks for your help and to you and everyone for all the hard work on
clang! I strongly prefer it and am
On Jul 10, 2013, at 18:28, J David wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
>> I missed one additional patch, which I imported in r253042.
>>
>
> Yes, I pulled that rev into my -STABLE and rebuilt and it is fine now.
I merged the patch to stable/9 in r253192.
-Dimitr
