Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:53:43PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 26 June 2013 12:51, Lars Engels wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:09:20PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> [snip] ok, I'll do a boot -v tonight when I get home and log things. > >> > >> Thanks! > > > > Please also try a recent C

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

On 26 Jun, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:23:32PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:42:43AM -0700, Chris H wrote: >> > Greetings, >> > I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild >> > after an updating >> > src && ports, resulted

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2013-06-27 09:40:33 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 09:40:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 0

can't build stable with clang after tcpdump import

Hi all. After recent tcpdump update I get this: cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump/../../../contrib/tcpdump -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_U_="__attribute__((unused))" -DINET6 -DLBL_ALIGN -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/openssl -DHAVE_LIBCRYPTO -DHAVE

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:53:43 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 26 June 2013 12:51, Lars Engels wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:09:20PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> [snip] ok, I'll do a boot -v tonight when I get home and log things. > >> > >> Thanks! > > > > Please also try a recent

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote: Having just gone through this in two different environments, I can very very strongly recommend doing the following. It's not the "easy button" of the TV commercials, but it will make things much much easier in the future. This is an interesting pro

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

Warren Block wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: Okay, look up the last time you installed or upgraded a port: % ls -ltr /var/db/pkg The last one is the most recently modified. Update your ports tree, follow all the steps that apply to your system sin

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

Ian Smith writes: > On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:53:43 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 26 June 2013 12:51, Lars Engels wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:09:20PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > >> [snip] ok, I'll do a boot -v tonight when I get home and log things. > > >> > > >> Thanks! >

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2013-06-27 09:40:33 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 09:40:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 0

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2013-06-27 09:40:33 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 09:40:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 0

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2013-06-27 09:40:33 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 09:40:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 0

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2013-06-27 10:59:28 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 10:59:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2013-06-27 12:35:43 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 12:35:43 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2013-06-27 12:55:02 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 12:55:02 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

> Warren Block wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: Okay, look up the last time you installed or upgraded a port: % ls -ltr /var/db/pkg The last one is the most recently modified. Update your ports tree, follow all the

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2013-06-27 12:36:06 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 12:36:06 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2013-06-27 12:36:10 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 12:36:10 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

TB --- 2013-06-27 15:05:28 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 15:05:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

Re: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/27/13 09:23, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > [...] cc -O -pipe -I/src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump > -I/src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump/../../../contrib/tcpdump > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_U_="__attribute__((unused))" -DINET6 -DLBL_ALIGN > -I/obj/arm.arm/src/tmp

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2013-06-27 15:05:28 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 15:05:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2013-06-27 15:05:28 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 15:05:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2013-06-27 15:05:28 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 15:05:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2013-06-27 16:23:23 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 16:23:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

In article , wbl...@wonkity.com writes: >On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote: > >> Having just gone through this in two different environments, I can >> very very strongly recommend doing the following. It's not the "easy >> button" of the TV commercials, but it will make things much much >

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote: In article , wbl...@wonkity.com writes: On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote: Having just gone through this in two different environments, I can very very strongly recommend doing the following. It's not the "easy button" of the TV commercial

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2013-06-27 18:02:11 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 18:02:11 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2013-06-27 18:18:35 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 18:18:35 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2013-06-27 18:02:23 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 18:02:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2013-06-27 18:02:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-06-27 18:02:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-06-27 1

AHCI Patsburg SATA controller and slow transfer speed

Greetings all. I'm on FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r251391M. I'm noticing two of my SATA disks are at half speed. Is this normal or is there some configuration I'm forgetting? # dmesg | grep -C 4 ahc ... ahci0: port 0x2070-0x2077,0x2060-0x2063,0x2050-0x2057,0x2040-0x2043,0x2020-0x203f mem 0xd0b

Re: AHCI Patsburg SATA controller and slow transfer speed

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Dave Hayes wrote: > Greetings all. I'm on FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r251391M. I'm noticing two of my > SATA disks are at half speed. Is this normal or is there some configuration > I'm forgetting? In my experience it's fairly common to have a mix of 6Gb/s and 3Gb/s po

Re: request for your comments on release documentation

On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Hiroki Sato wrote: > I would like your comments on release notes for each release. > Although I have been working on editing them for years, the workflow > is still not optimal and sometimes delay of the preparation became an > obstacle for release process. I would

Re: request for your comments on release documentation

Mark Felder wrote: On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:49:21 -0500, Hiroki Sato wrote: [...] 3. Is there missing information which should be in the relnotes? Probably there are some missing items for each release, but this question is one at some abstraction level. Link to commit log and diff, detailed d

Re: request for your comments on release documentation

On Jun 27, 2013, at 7:24 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Mark Felder wrote: >> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:49:21 -0500, Hiroki Sato wrote: > > [...] > >>> 3. Is there missing information which should be in the relnotes? >>> Probably there are some missing items for each release, but this >>> question

Re: AHCI Patsburg SATA controller and slow transfer speed

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:21:57PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote: > Greetings all. I'm on FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r251391M. I'm noticing > two of my SATA disks are at half speed. Is this normal or is there > some configuration I'm forgetting? > > # dmesg | grep -C 4 ahc > ... > ahci0: port > 0x2070-0x207

Re: AHCI Patsburg SATA controller and slow transfer speed

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 06:38:27PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Next, this statement by ahci(4) then confuses the user: > > > ahci0: AHCI v1.30 with 6 6Gbps ports, Port Multiplier not supported > > You see, when AHCI was invented, the existing idea was that all ports > would have the same spee

Re: AHCI Patsburg SATA controller and slow transfer speed

On 06/27/13 18:38, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Next, this statement by ahci(4) then confuses the user: ahci0: AHCI v1.30 with 6 6Gbps ports, Port Multiplier not supported Yes, this confuses even a seasoned user. ;) TL;DR -- Your motherboard offers 6 ports, 2 of which are SATA600, 4 of which are