TB --- 2013-06-18 06:06:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-06-18 06:06:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2013-06-18 0
TB --- 2013-06-18 07:19:57 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-06-18 07:19:57 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2013-06-18 0
TB --- 2013-06-18 06:17:28 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-06-18 06:17:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2013-06-18 0
Hi,
I use ftp-proxy, together with the patch that starts multiple instances:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/158171
I use it in a combination with pure-ftpd on the backend-server.
on the proxy:
1434 ?? Ss 0:17.06 /usr/sbin/ftp-proxy -vv -b 127.0.0.2 -R 192.168.91.42
92
Hi,
I have exactly the same problem. I've tried to apply the above patch
but it refused. I've checked out the last revision (251934) of
-STABLE branch using Subversion.
% git apply --check patch
error: patch failed: sys/dev/drm2/i915/intel_fb.c:207
error: sys/dev/drm2/i915/intel_fb.c: patch does
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:11:43 -0500, Rainer Duffner
wrote:
Hi,
I use ftp-proxy, together with the patch that starts multiple instances:
I recommend avoiding ftp-proxy and setting up static rules that you know
will work. On our systems in pure-ftpd.conf we set
PassivePortRange
On 06/18/2013 13:28, Javad Kouhi wrote:
Hi,
I have exactly the same problem. I've tried to apply the above patch
but it refused. I've checked out the last revision (251934) of
-STABLE branch using Subversion.
% git apply --check patch
error: patch failed: sys/dev/drm2/i915/intel_fb.c:207
error
Thanks for the reply, seems that our source trees are not same, I got this:
% patch -p1 < /path/to/patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff --git a/sys/dev/drm2/i915/intel_fb.c b/sys/dev/drm2/i915/intel_fb.c
|index 3cb3b78..
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:00:30PM +0430, Javad Kouhi wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, seems that our source trees are not same, I got this:
>
> % patch -p1 < /path/to/patch
> Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --
> |diff --git a/s
TB --- 2013-06-18 13:01:09 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-06-18 13:01:09 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2013-06-18 1
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:00:30PM +0430, Javad Kouhi wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply, seems that our source trees are not same, I got
> this:
> >
> > % patch -p1 < /path/to/patch
> > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> > The text
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> I do not use git, I use svn, So I cannot help you with git "crap".
>
> Please revert your sys/dev/drm2/i915/intel_fb.c and
> sys/dev/syscons/scvgarndr.c back to r251934 (or newer) before following
> what I tell you below.
>
> The problem
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:37:10PM +0430, Javad Kouhi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >
> > I do not use git, I use svn, So I cannot help you with git "crap".
> >
> > Please revert your sys/dev/drm2/i915/intel_fb.c and
> > sys/dev/syscons/scvgarndr.c back to r251
When I run "make check-old, the /usr/include/c++/v1 and v1/ext directories
are listed as old, but they are still present in BSD.include.dist, so are
recreated every time I installworld.
Could these directories be removed from BSD.include.dist, as I am pretty
sure that they ARE obsolete.
--
R. Kev
Am 18.06.2013 um 13:32 schrieb "Mark Felder" :
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:11:43 -0500, Rainer Duffner
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I use ftp-proxy, together with the patch that starts multiple instances:
>>
>
> I recommend avoiding ftp-proxy and setting up static rules that you know will
> wo
I've read the posts again. Although the issue looks same as Michiel
Boland (first link) but I'm not sure if the root of the issue is same
as Michiel's too (second link). Anyway, it should be discussed in
another thread as you said.
> Second, the patch is not mine -- it's Konstantin's. I did not w
On Jun 18, 2013, at 21:03, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> When I run "make check-old, the /usr/include/c++/v1 and v1/ext directories
> are listed as old, but they are still present in BSD.include.dist, so are
> recreated every time I installworld.
>
> Could these directories be removed from BSD.include.d
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:41:10AM +0430, Javad Kouhi wrote:
> I've read the posts again. Although the issue looks same as Michiel
> Boland (first link) but I'm not sure if the root of the issue is same
> as Michiel's too (second link). Anyway, it should be discussed in
> another thread as you said
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:22:55PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 21:03, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > When I run "make check-old, the /usr/include/c++/v1 and v1/ext directories
> > are listed as old, but they are still present in BSD.include.dist, so are
> > recreated every time I
TB --- 2013-06-18 22:51:34 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-06-18 22:51:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2013-06-18 2
20 matches
Mail list logo