Re: recommended memory for zfs

2013-05-10 Thread Ronald Klop
On Fri, 10 May 2013 04:18:42 +0200, Benjamin Adams wrote: On 05/09/2013 10:06 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:27PM -0400, Benjamin Adams wrote: On 05/09/2013 08:53 PM, Shane Ambler wrote: On 09/05/2013 22:48, Benjamin Adams wrote: Hello zfs question about memory.

Re: recommended memory for zfs

2013-05-10 Thread Daniel Kalchev
On May 10, 2013, at 1:08 PM, "Ronald Klop" wrote: > On Fri, 10 May 2013 04:18:42 +0200, Benjamin Adams > wrote: > >> On 05/09/2013 10:06 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >>> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:27PM -0400, Benjamin Adams wrote: On 05/09/2013 08:53 PM, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 09/

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-05-10 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 05/09/13 22:42, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: An ugly workaround to complete the jail closure, when relying on jail.conf, is to: jail -r $JAILNAME umount /$LOCATION_OF_JAILS/$JAILNAME/dev || true The only problem with devfs I'm aware of is it not catching the right ruleset when starting in the r

Generating ISO With Pre-Installed Packages

2013-05-10 Thread Shawn Webb
Hey All, I'm looking to generate a FreeBSD 9-stable (and maybe 10-current) ISO that has certain packages pre-installed. I'd like to create my own installation media that will have certain things installed, like a web management UI that I'm actively working on. It'd be like what pfSense does. I di

Re: Generating ISO With Pre-Installed Packages

2013-05-10 Thread Rick Miller
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Shawn Webb wrote: > Hey All, > > I'm looking to generate a FreeBSD 9-stable (and maybe 10-current) ISO that > has certain packages pre-installed. I'd like to create my own installation > media that will have certain things installed, like a web management UI > tha

Re: Generating ISO With Pre-Installed Packages

2013-05-10 Thread Lucas Holt
As Rick pointed out, the package split script will get the packages on the media. You also need to modify the install process to actually install the default packages. You might want to look at the bsdinstall setup and add a script there to load the packages. Another approach is to create a scri

Re: Apparent regression in r250359

2013-05-10 Thread Dennis Glatting
This patch works on one of my 9.1 systems in addition to my CURRENT system. On Thu, 9 May 2013, Jim Ohlstein wrote: On 05/09/13 12:04, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:42:28AM -0400, Jim Ohlstein wrote: On 05/09/13 10:30, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2

bin/152154: script(1) -k malfunctions with certain shells (e.g. tcsh, bash, zsh)

2013-05-10 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/152154 It has been suggested to me (by a committer) that I should raise the issue of this PR here on these lists, because the problem described within the PR remains a real problem, and despite my having proposed something that seems to be a perfectl

Re: bin/152154: script(1) -k malfunctions with certain shells (e.g. tcsh, bash, zsh)

2013-05-10 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/152154 > > It has been suggested to me (by a committer) that I should raise the > issue of this PR here on these lists, because the problem described > within the PR remains a real problem, and despite my having proposed > something that seems

Re: bin/152154: script(1) -k malfunctions with certain shells (e.g. tcsh, bash, zsh)

2013-05-10 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <20130510213610.gg8...@home.opsec.eu>, you wrote: >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/152154 >> >> It has been suggested to me (by a committer) that I should raise the >> issue of this PR here on these lists, because the problem described >> within the PR remains a real

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2013-05-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-05-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2013-05-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2013-05-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2013-05-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2013-05-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-10 23:05:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-05-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-10 23:38:53 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-10 23:38:53 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2013-05-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-05-10 23:38:23 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-05-10 23:38:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

How abuot firewall_nat_rules?

2013-05-10 Thread KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko
Hi stable list, Now ipfw_nat's rules must be write directly in firewall_nat_flags. This is messy to describe many rules. firewall_nat_rules will be treat smartly. To enable firewall_nat_rules,apply following patch to /etc/rc.firewall --- /etc/rc.firewall.org2013-05-11 08:23:13.0 +