> In the previous version (0.61), the process of checking
> file names against the list of known files in the
> repository was inefficient and most likely accounts for
> the slow down you're seeing. I've reimplemented it using
> a binary search tree and the lookup phase is no longer a
> bottl
here is what I used to use (not 100% match, but quite close):
indent -bad -bap -bbb -d4 -di1 -fc1 -i4 -nip -npsl -nut $*
--
Markiyan.
On 13.04.2013 02:38, John Mehr wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:14:57 PM UTC+6, mrb..
The only thing I would like to add -- tree lookup did make a good effect
on CPU consumption.
--
Markiyan.
On 13.04.2013 10:38, mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
In the previous version (0.61), the process of checking
file names against the list of known files in the
repository was inefficient and most
On 13.04.2013 11:29, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
The only thing I would like to add -- tree lookup did make a good effect
on CPU consumption.
John,
I'm just curious, did you consider sys/tree.h for tree implementation? I
realize that it wouldn't be well portable to Linux. Any way, did you
have o
On Apr 13, 2013, at 03:15, dparussa...@baysidegrp.com.au wrote:
> I am having issues compiling gnutls-2.12.23 on Freebsd 6.4 stable
> platform. Please find the following errors.
>
> Any help much appropriated.
>
> checking whether uses 'inline' correctly... no
> configure: error: cannot be used
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Phil Kulin wrote:
>> 2012/12/26 Kimmo Paasiala :
>>
>>> I've revised the patch again and updated it at gihub,
>>> https://gist.github.com/4362018. It can now be applied at top level
>>> of sources (/usr/sr
Hi --
On 13.04.2013, at 14:29, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
[great deal of simplification by ipv6_addrs_IF]
> Sorry to resurrect this thread but since nothing has happened in about
> three months I have to ask: What can I do to have this commited to
> HEAD?
+1
Nowadays -where IPv6 becomes more and m
Thanks Dimitry,
I've tried with the ENV variable in the Makefile. But still getting the
same error.
Any other ideas? I need to get the gnutls working on this system.
Cheers,
On Sat, April 13, 2013 21:52, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2013, at 03:15, dparussa...@baysidegrp.com.au wrote:
>
>
To follow-up:
I installed 9.1-RELEASE last night, then went and cvsup'ed to the latest that
RELENG_9 would give me.
Everything is completely stock, I have not modified any config files other than
filling out the setup questions (hostname, em0 set to DHCP, added a base user
so I can ssh to it)
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:02:17PM +, Chris Forgeron wrote:
> To follow-up:
>
> I installed 9.1-RELEASE last night, then went and cvsup'ed to the latest that
> RELENG_9 would give me.
>
> Everything is completely stock, I have not modified any config files other
> than filling out the setup
Interesting about the drivers - I will look into that tomorrow, I could be on
an older version. I started down that path a little while ago, but when pkng
wasn't quite ready, I just reverted to the old ways/ommands that seemed to
work.
Here is the dump of the requested commands. I will point o
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:02:56AM +, Chris Forgeron wrote:
> Interesting about the drivers - I will look into that tomorrow, I could be on
> an older version. I started down that path a little while ago, but when pkng
> wasn't quite ready, I just reverted to the old ways/ommands that seemed
Hi all
I was updating a newly installed FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE box to 9-STABLE,
and was preparing to install the kernel in order to reboot to test it.
However I was immediately hit with this:
> # make installkernel DESTDIR=/ROOT/9-STABLE-2013-04-13
ERROR: Required auditdistd user is missing, see /u
13 matches
Mail list logo
