on 29/01/2013 05:21 Garrett Wollman said the following:
> When
> I restarted mountd, it hung waiting on rrl->rr_, but the system may
> already have been deadlocked at that point. procstat reported:
>
> 87678 104365 mountd -mi_switch sleepq_wait _cv_wait
> rrw_enter zfs_
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 0
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 0
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 0
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 0
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 0
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 08:35:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 0
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:00:28 -0500
Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been working for past several months on improving the FAQ. At
> the moment there are 31 unreviewed questions.
>
> Can you all help out by commenting on the yellow questions here:
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/ThwackAFAQ -
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:00:28 -0500
Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been working for past several months on improving the FAQ. At
> the moment there are 31 unreviewed questions.
>
> Can you all help out by commenting on the yellow questions here:
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/ThwackAFAQ -
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 11:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 13:35:01 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 16:05:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
On Jan 27, 2013, at 10:27 PM, John Mehr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I've got all of the protocol issues sorted out as good as they'll
> probably get. I can't get the exact file permissions from the get-file
> requests -- it only lets me know which ones are executable. Setting
> executables to
In CURRENT I have added a number of features to the install(1) command
that are derived from NetBSD. One of them is the -M option
that causes new-style mtree entries to be emitted for each object that
is created in the target. In the interest of compatibility and usability I
removed the previous
TB --- 2013-01-29 18:05:28 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 18:05:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 18:05:28 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 18:05:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
TB --- 2013-01-29 18:05:28 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 18:05:28 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 1
On 1/17/2013 4:35 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2013-01-17 14:07, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Please try the following patch, which tells configure that HAVE_STRNVIS
>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 1/17/2013 4:35 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> On 2013-01-17 14:07, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Please try
Hiroki Sato wrote
in <20130104.023244.472910818423317661@allbsd.org>:
hr> Konstantin Belousov wrote
hr> in <20130102174044.gb82...@kib.kiev.ua>:
hr>
hr> ko> > I might take a closer look this evening and see if I can spot anything
hr> ko> > in the log, rick
hr> ko> > ps: I hope Alan and K
TB --- 2013-01-29 22:00:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 22:00:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 2
TB --- 2013-01-29 22:00:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 22:00:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 2
TB --- 2013-01-29 22:00:00 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-01-29 22:00:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013-01-29 2
on 29/01/2013 23:44 Hiroki Sato said the following:
> http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/pool-20130130.txt
> http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/pool-20130130-info.txt
I recognize here a ZFS ARC deadlock that should have been prevented by r241773
and its MFCs (r242858 for 9, r242859 for 8
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/01/2013 23:44 Hiroki Sato said the following:
> > http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/pool-20130130.txt
> > http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/pool-20130130-info.txt
>
> I recognize here a ZFS ARC deadlock that should have been prevented by
> r241773
> and its
Hello.
We have a webserver using FreeBSD, we read about tunning kern.ipc.somaxconn
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-kernel-limits.html)
so the OS can handle all the connections. Is there a way to know how many
connections are established in a certain momen
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Efraín Déctor wrote:
> Hello.
>
> We have a webserver using FreeBSD, we read about tunning
> kern.ipc.somaxconn (
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-kernel-limits.html)
> so the OS can handle all the connections. Is there a way
From: Adam Vande More
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 7:33 PM
To: Efraín Déctor
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: About kern.ipc.somaxconn and netstat
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Efraín Déctor
wrote:
Hello.
We have a webserver using FreeBSD, we read about tunning kern.ipc
I was able to correct the problem as well by prefixing strnvis, avoiding
the symbol collision. I also found PR: ports/172941 which also has a fix.
Using my patch or the patch in ports/172941 fixes the segfault for me in
stable/9. However, I quickly ran into another problem. I can't remember the
er
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:27 AM, James wrote:
> I was able to correct the problem as well by prefixing strnvis, avoiding the
> symbol collision. I also found PR: ports/172941 which also has a fix.
>
> Using my patch or the patch in ports/172941 fixes the segfault for me in
> stable/9. However, I q
45 matches
Mail list logo