Re: Svnsup architecture

2013-01-27 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Disclaimer: I am trying to go inside the technicalities of the SVN protocol. I am not sure whether this sub-thread should belong to this list or to another; I am open to suggestions on this topic. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 07:40:45PM -0600, John Mehr wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:42:19 +0100 Arri

Re: Svnsup architecture

2013-01-27 Thread John Mehr
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:49:08 +0100 Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Disclaimer: I am trying to go inside the technicalities >of the SVN > protocol. I am not sure whether this sub-thread should >belong to this > list or to another; I am open to suggestions on this >topic. >

Re: libstdc++, libsupc++, delete operators and valgrind

2013-01-27 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 02:19:55PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > Hi, > > Some time ago I noticed that valgrind started to complain about > "Mismatched free() / delete / delete []" for valid new/delete > combinations. > > For example, the following test program > > int main() > { > char

Re: bge numbering

2013-01-27 Thread Ronald Klop
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:46:10 +0100, Daniel Braniss wrote: Hi, this server, a Dell R720 has 4 bge on board, Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572 bge0: APE FW version: NCSI v1.1.7.0 bge0: CHIP ID 0x0572; ASIC REV 0x5720; CHIP REV 0x57200; PCI-E miibus

Re: bge numbering

2013-01-27 Thread Daniel Braniss
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:46:10 +0100, Daniel Braniss > wrote: > > > Hi, > > this server, a Dell R720 has 4 bge on board, > > Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572 > > bge0: APE FW version: NCSI v1.1.7.0 > > bge0: CHIP ID 0x0572; ASIC REV 0x5720; CHIP REV 0x

Re: time issues and ZFS

2013-01-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 26 January 2013 02:15, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 23/01/2013 18:20 Adrian Chadd said the following: >> It may be a quirk of an older 9.x, which is fixed in -HEAD. It may be >> a quirk of the older generation celeron hardware - in which case, we >> need to tell the user somehow.. > > This is not s

Re: time issues and ZFS

2013-01-27 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 27/01/2013 19:27 Adrian Chadd said the following: > On 26 January 2013 02:15, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 23/01/2013 18:20 Adrian Chadd said the following: >>> It may be a quirk of an older 9.x, which is fixed in -HEAD. It may be >>> a quirk of the older generation celeron hardware - in which cas

mergemaster -p / installkernel problem

2013-01-27 Thread Michiel Boland
# mergemaster -p *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot *** Beginning comparison *** Comparison complete *** /var/tmp/temproot is empty, deleting # make inst

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-27 Thread Isaac (.ike) Levy
On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > Hi, > > in ancient times there was cvsup. ... > Then there came csup. ... > Times have been changing, we're now up to svn. ... > alternative small svn client I'm trying to consolidate notes on this topic, here: https://wiki.freebsd.or

named fails two weeks ago unexpectedly

2013-01-27 Thread jmorenov
Hi I was used FreeBSD 9.1 Release since December 2012, I usually use "portsnap fetch && update" and "portmaster-a" to keep my system updated. Two weeks ago unexpectedly "named" not worked. this is my case: "Problem: root@server:/etc # /etc/rc.d/named start /etc/rc.d/named: ERROR: get_pidfile_f

Re: mergemaster -p / installkernel problem

2013-01-27 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Michiel Boland wrote: > # mergemaster -p > > *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot > *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use > *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot > > > > *** Beginning comparison > > > ***

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-27 Thread Isaac (.ike) Levy
Hi Peter, On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2013-Jan-23 15:40:50 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: >> in ancient times there was cvsup. cvsup was a PITA if you wanted (or >> needed) to install it via ports, the only reasonable way was to use >> pkg_add for that if you didn'

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/27/2013 09:24 PM, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> On 2013-Jan-23 15:40:50 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: >>> in ancient times there was cvsup. cvsup was a PITA if you wanted (or >>> needed) to install it via ports, the only

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-27 Thread John Mehr
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:03:35 -0500  "Isaac (.ike) Levy" wrote: On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:27 PM, John Mehr wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:27:23 +0100   Oliver Brandmueller wrote: Also I'd like to mention John Mehr, who's work on a "lightweight, dependency-free, BSD licensed program to pull source

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-27 Thread Glen Barber
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 09:27:11PM -0600, John Mehr wrote: > All I have left at this point is to add support for > command line configuration options, add comments, tidy > everything up, get it to conform to the "man style" > guidelines and test it against a remote repository. > If you have co

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-27 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2013-Jan-27 21:54:44 -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >On 01/27/2013 09:24 PM, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote: >> Thank you for adding the ctm bits in the page, I'm deeply intrigued by >> possibly solving this problem with bits *already* in base?!! >Suppose you want to keep up with 9.x-stable.

Re: mergemaster -p / installkernel problem

2013-01-27 Thread Michiel Boland
On 01/28/2013 02:10, Kevin Oberman wrote: You don't by any chance have a mergemaster.rc in /etc or .mergemasterrc in $HOME? Duh... I'll go stand in the corner for the next 37 years. Cheers Michiel ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://