Re: how to destroy zfs parent filesystem without destroying children - corrupted file causing kernel panick

2012-12-29 Thread Greg Bonett
> > Does: > > cat /dev/null > bad.file > > Cause a kernel panic? > > > ah, sadly that does cause a kernel panic. I hadn't tried it though, thanks for the suggestion. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre

Re: 9.1 minimal ram requirements

2012-12-29 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Mark Linimon : > In an ideal world, the bits that will almost certainly become FreeBSD 9.1 > would not appear on the masters, or any of the mirrors, until the same > instant that the release announcement is set to freebsd-annou...@freebsd.org. > In practice this doesn't happen. If there is

FreeBSD 9 (amd64) buildworld stage 4.2 fails with clang: unknown target cpu i686

2012-12-29 Thread Mark van Dijk
Hello everyone, I'm running FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE and today I synchronised my /usr/src directory with the svn_stable_9 branch on gitorious [1]. I am using ccache. My /etc/make.conf contains the following: -8<- CPUTYPE?=native CFLAGS=-O3 -pipe COPT

Re: 9.1 minimal ram requirements

2012-12-29 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Mark Linimon : > >> In an ideal world, the bits that will almost certainly become FreeBSD 9.1 >> would not appear on the masters, or any of the mirrors, until the same >> instant that the release announcement is set to freebsd-annou...@

Re: 9.1 minimal ram requirements

2012-12-29 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Thomas Mueller > wrote: >> from Mark Linimon : >> >>> In an ideal world, the bits that will almost certainly become FreeBSD 9.1 >>> would not appear on the masters, or any of the mirrors, until the same >>>

Re: FreeBSD 9 (amd64) buildworld stage 4.2 fails with clang: unknown target cpu i686

2012-12-29 Thread Mark van Dijk
On 29-12-12 12:53, Mark van Dijk wrote: > (...) > I'll admit that I did modify my make.conf right before building. It > already *did* contain the CC/CXX/CPP lines for clang but the ccache > portion was slightly different. It used to contain the literal contents > of ccache-howto-freebsd.txt: > > C

Re: FS hang with suspfs when creating snapshot on a UFS + GJOURNAL setup

2012-12-29 Thread Pavel Gorshkov
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:27:24PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Please try the following patch. It is against HEAD, might need some > adjustments for 8. I do the resume and write accounting atomically, > not allowing other suspension to intervent between. So is this only limited to snapshot

Re: FreeBSD 9 (amd64) buildworld stage 4.2 fails with clang: unknown target cpu i686

2012-12-29 Thread Mark van Dijk
On 29-12-12 12:53, Mark van Dijk wrote: > I suspect that the error is caused by -march=native, my CPU is an Intel > Core i5. Looks like I was correct. CPUTYPE?=core2 will build world fine so perhaps 'native' does not know about my processor yet. Apparently it falls back to assuming it's a i686. M

Re: FreeBSD 9 (amd64) buildworld stage 4.2 fails with clang: unknown target cpu i686

2012-12-29 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Mark van Dijk wrote: > On 29-12-12 12:53, Mark van Dijk wrote: >> I suspect that the error is caused by -march=native, my CPU is an Intel >> Core i5. > > Looks like I was correct. CPUTYPE?=core2 will build world fine so > perhaps 'native' does not know about my pro

Re: FreeBSD 9 (amd64) buildworld stage 4.2 fails with clang: unknown target cpu i686

2012-12-29 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-12-29 20:02, Scot Hetzel wrote:> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Mark van Dijk wrote: On 29-12-12 12:53, Mark van Dijk wrote: I suspect that the error is caused by -march=native, my CPU is an Intel Core i5. Looks like I was correct. CPUTYPE?=core2 will build world fine so perhaps 'n

Re: FreeBSD 9 (amd64) buildworld stage 4.2 fails with clang: unknown target cpu i686

2012-12-29 Thread Jakub Lach
Humph, so it's not supported, then it's working then it's not supported again. How come it's working for most (I'm not being sarcastic, genuinely concerned, as setting to native is handy)? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-9-amd64-buildworld-stage-4-

Re: FreeBSD 9 (amd64) buildworld stage 4.2 fails with clang: unknown target cpu i686

2012-12-29 Thread Jakub Lach
e.g. Penryn CPU: $ cc -march=native -E -v - &1 | grep cc1 "/usr/bin/cc" -cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0 -E -disable-free -main-file-name - -mrelocation-model static -mdisable-fp-elim -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -munwind-tables -target-cpu penryn -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -v -resour

Re: how to destroy zfs parent filesystem without destroying children - corrupted file causing kernel panick

2012-12-29 Thread Artem Belevich
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Greg Bonett wrote: > > > > > Does: > > > > cat /dev/null > bad.file > > > > Cause a kernel panic? > > > > > > > ah, sadly that does cause a kernel panic. I hadn't tried it though, thanks > for the suggestion. It's probably a long shot, but you may try removing ba

Re: how to destroy zfs parent filesystem without destroying children - corrupted file causing kernel panick

2012-12-29 Thread Greg Bonett
> It's probably a long shot, but you may try removing bad file using > illumos (ex opensolaris) system (or liveCD). In the past it used to be > a little bit more robust than FreeBSD when it came to dealing with > filesystem corruption. In one case I had illumos printed out a message > about corrupt