on 25/12/2012 02:11 Derek Kulinski said the following:
> Hello Andriy,
>
> Monday, December 24, 2012, 3:28:00 PM, you wrote:
>
>> I've looked through the cores and it does look like in all cases some sort of
>> memory corruption is a precursor to a subsequent crash.
>
>> I can't decidedly say if
So, it's fine and recommended to remove ctl device
from kernel? I installed from image on the site two
weeks ago and consider it release.
Zoran
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
I always considered FreeBSD to be the most unabiguous, straightforward
and sometimes even raw, but still extremely powerful and innovative,
operating system out there. Seeing 9.1-RELEASE instead 9.1-PRERELASE
or 9.1-RC4 is also a bad suprise for me...
I have fallback into RC3 and I think the RELEA
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> If it works for 99.99% percent of the users and fails for the
> remaining miniscule percentage because they have a very peculiar
> hardware, very small amount of ram etc, should the release called
> buggy and unstable? I really don't think s
Hello Andriy,
Tuesday, December 25, 2012, 12:18:23 AM, you wrote:
>> I recompiled the kernel and is running with options you specified (I
>> enabled DEBUG in the file).
>>
>> Anyway even at boot time I started getting following warnings, is this
>> anything:
> These witness warning are OK-ish.
