On Saturday 08 December 2012 22:26:30 Chris Petrik wrote:
> It will be released when it is ready.
>
Perfect answer... And one hour after release thounsands of new ports for
building on Christmas time ):
Mitja
http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa
_
This is good answer for end users, not so much when
somebody is genuinely concerned if there were some
unforeseen issues.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Will-we-get-a-RELEASE-9-1-for-Christmas-tp5767716p5767785.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing lis
...so needless to say, I prefer one provided by developer (in this case
Adrian's),
even if it is laconic.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Will-we-get-a-RELEASE-9-1-for-Christmas-tp5767716p5767789.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Na
On 9 December 2012 08:48, Jakub Lach wrote:
> This is good answer for end users, not so much when
> somebody is genuinely concerned if there were some
> unforeseen issues.
Agreed. Companies need predictability.
FWIW: The ports tree is open now (ports branch was tagged). The 9.1.0
src branch wa
On 2012-12-09 04:18, Brett Glass wrote:
Just checking in, yet again, to ask about the status of FreeBSD
9.1. We've been delaying construction of new servers (which we
wanted to build during the US Thanksgiving holiday) until the
release, and really want to be able to work on them over Christmas.
#sound-card-support
First part is fine, assuming man pages will be up to date etc. Not sure
about
support for MIDI cards/MPU-401. Is this covered by uart? Don't know whatever
was "Microsoft® Sound System specification".
#es1370-silent-pcm
That's one thing, but most often silent device is caus
Just FYI, "Microsoft Sound System Specification" probably
was meant to be Windows Sound System (?), severely
obsolete standard...
"WSS was based on Analog Devices AD1848 codec chip
with Yamaha OPL3 (YMF262-M) FM synthesis sound chip."
Probably already axed, it was supported by
dev/sound/isa/mss
Closest now would be ancient snd_ad1816, maybe it could be
usable with it but it's pure speculation, good luck with finding
hardware and testing that :)
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5767810.html
Sent from the freebsd-stabl
AdLib ROX! :-)
http://www.datasheetarchive.com/indexer.php?file=DSA00355987.pdf&dir=Datasheet-020&keywords=AD1848%2F1846&database=user-highscore#
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Analog-Devices-AD1848KP-ISA-SoundPort-Opti-82C29A-/200846434225?pt=US_Sound_Cards_Internal_&hash=item2ec3615fb1
At computer de
Brett Glass lariat.net> writes:
>
> Just checking in, yet again, to ask about the status of FreeBSD
> 9.1. We've been delaying construction of new servers (which we
> wanted to build during the US Thanksgiving holiday) until the
> release, and really want to be able to work on them over Chris
On 12/09/2012 10:37 AM, jb wrote:
I understand that releng people will build all packages once more right before
9.1 release, but perhaps caution is warranted - would 9.1-RC4 make sense ?
I recently upgraded in place from 8.3-STABLE to 9.1-PRE. I needed to redo
the system because of the sec co
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 5:37 PM, jb wrote:
> A few days ago I installed 9.0 and tested twice:
> (..)
> Only after this security compromise, time wise, things were so unstable.
> I understand that releng people will build all packages once more right before
> 9.1 release, but perhaps caution is warr
CeDeROM tlen.pl> writes:
> ...
> Was also true for me to crash the 9.0 system with dependencies
> inconsistency after some time. But! Try 9.1-RC3 and use PORTINSTALL
> ...
The reason I abandoned 9.1-RC? was the security update statement that
"It is believed that the compromise may have occurred
My prediction is 9.1 will be released the last day of Hanukkah and I will tell
you why:
When I was a kid sometimes I would ask my patients to give me one big gift for
Hanukkah instead of a small present each day. This would mean I would have to
wait until the final day though.
My assumption i
At 07:42 AM 12/9/2012, Dimitry Andric wrote:
It has nothing to do with clang; it is not the default compiler for 9.1,
and will never be for the 9.x series. Using it to compile your system
(or ports) is entirely optional.
I am actually eagerly awaiting a completely "un-GNUed" toolchain. But I
.. if people would like to see more resources thrown at getting things
like timely releases done, please consider donating to the FreeBSD
foundation and write to them about what you'd like to see.
I think people are really quite used to getting "something for nothing".
This isn't an attack at you
On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:59:31 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. if people would like to see more resources thrown at getting things
> like timely releases done, please consider donating to the FreeBSD
> foundation and write to them about what you'd like to see.
>
> I think people are really quite us
At 01:59 PM 12/9/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>.. if people would like to see more resources thrown at getting things
>like timely releases done, please consider donating to the FreeBSD
>foundation and write to them about what you'd like to see.
>
>I think people are really quite used to getting "so
Hi,
It's definitely not targeted at you. The 9.1 stuff is an intersection of:
* personal issues with some of the people involved (ie, "real life got
to them and that took precedence");
* the security incident;
* the freebsd cluster shuffling and reshuffling that was going on at
the same time
>Fr
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's definitely not targeted at you. The 9.1 stuff is an intersection of:
>
> * personal issues with some of the people involved (ie, "real life got
> to them and that took precedence");
> * the security incident;
> * the freebsd clust
Brett Glass wrote:
> At 07:42 AM 12/9/2012, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> >It has nothing to do with clang; it is not the default compiler for 9.1,
> >and will never be for the 9.x series. Using it to compile your system
> >(or ports) is entirely optional.
>
> I am actually eagerly awaiting a comple
21 matches
Mail list logo
