Re: nomenclature for conf files

2012-11-12 Thread Chris Rees
On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote: > > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's > > any difference. Are those 3 line the same? > > > > WITH_KMS=YES > > WITH_KMS="YES" > > WITH_KMS=yes > > With regard to their use in /etc/

Re: nomenclature for conf files

2012-11-12 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:29:27AM +, Chris Rees wrote: > On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote: > > > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's > > > any difference. Are those 3 line the same? > > > > > > WITH_KMS=YES

Re: nomenclature for conf files

2012-11-12 Thread Chris Rees
On 12 Nov 2012 08:55, "Paul Schenkeveld" wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:29:27AM +, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote: > > > > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's > > > > any

Re: nomenclature for conf files

2012-11-12 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:24:57AM +, Chris Rees wrote: > On 12 Nov 2012 08:55, "Paul Schenkeveld" wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:29:27AM +, Chris Rees wrote: > > > On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote: > >

Re: ZFS corruption due to lack of space?

2012-11-12 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Nov-02 09:30:04 -, Steven Hartland wr= > ote: > >From: "Peter Jeremy" > >> Many years ago, I wrote a simple utility that fills a raw disk with > >> a pseudo-random sequence and then verifies it. This sort of tool > > > >Sounds useful, got a link? > > Sorry, no.

Re: Panic during kernel boot, igb-init related? (8.3-RELEASE)

2012-11-12 Thread Charles Owens
On 11/1/12 2:25 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: 31.10.2012 23:58, Charles Owens пишет: Hello, We're seeing boot-time panics in about 4% of cases when upgrading from FreeBSD 8.1 to 8.3-RELEASE (i386). This problem is subtle enough that it escaped detection during our regular testing cycle... now wit

Re: nomenclature for conf files

2012-11-12 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote: >> > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's >> > any difference. Are those 3 line the same? >> > >> > WITH_KMS=YES >> > WITH_

Re: nomenclature for conf files

2012-11-12 Thread Chris Rees
On 12 Nov 2012 15:35, "Kurt Buff" wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > > > On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote: > >> > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's > >> > any difference. Ar