On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 20/10/2012 22:42 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 20/10/2012 22:20 Derek Kulinski said the following:
>>> I have three questions though:
>>> 1. The motherboard has 4 fan sockets (as far as I can tell), CPU_FAN,
>>>and SYS_FAN[1-3]
on 21/10/2012 10:11 Scot Hetzel said the following:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 20/10/2012 22:42 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>> on 20/10/2012 22:20 Derek Kulinski said the following:
I have three questions though:
1. The motherboard has 4 fan socket
Normally I start X by startx which may be followed by an initialization file,
so I don't get the default spartan default twm all the time. In Linux and
FreeBSD, I generally use X as nonroot.
So I don't really know how to start a program such as xterm as another user
or how to have both root and n
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 07:10:19AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> This seems ... fairly weird to me.
>
> Yesterday, I built & booted:
>
> FreeBSD g1-227.catwhisker.org 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #274
> 241726M: Fri Oct 19 05:40:05 PDT 2012
> r...@g1-227.catwhisker.org:/usr/obj/u
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 03:13:56PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> ...
> > Anyone else seeing this? Any ideas how to diagnose it?
>
> devread is the method of devctl(4) which passes devd notifications from
> the kernel to userland (to devd, specifically). There were no changes to
> devctl(4)
Hello,
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 05:10:53 -0400
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Normally I start X by startx which may be followed by an initialization file,
> so I don't get the default spartan default twm all the time. In Linux and
> FreeBSD, I generally use X as nonroot.
Which is the "normal" and correct
Hi Thomas,
21.10.2012 13:10, Thomas Mueller пишет:
> So I don't really know how to start a program such as xterm as another user
> or how to have both root and nonroot windows in X.
AFAIC Matthew Seaman already gave you a wonderful suggestion to add
yourself to the group "operator" and just use
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Normally I start X by startx which may be followed by an initialization file,
so I don't get the default spartan default twm all the time. In Linux and
FreeBSD, I generally use X as nonroot.
So I don't really know how to start a program such as xterm
> AFAIC Matthew Seaman already gave you a wonderful suggestion to add
> yourself to the group "operator" and just use the command "shutdown"
> with your own rights only. Did you try this suggestion?
Actually, it is wheel group.
To me it is "normal" to read mail and do something mundane in
console,
On 2012-Oct-20, at 08:29 , Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>> Yesterday I have gotten lenovo e320 laptop, with core i3 2350
>> and HD3000 integrated. Gonna wait few days till 9.1 release.
>> I never used anything aside "intel" on my old laptop. Kostik
>
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 03:13:56PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 07:10:19AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > This seems ... fairly weird to me.
> >
> > Yesterday, I built & booted:
> >
> > FreeBSD g1-227.catwhisker.org 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #274
> >
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:33:22AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> So I tried reverting 241749 ... and I failed to reproduce the problem.
>
> Well, one boot out of one, at least. I'll try a few more reality
> checks, and report back if a correction is in order. But (for now, at
> least), i
Hello Andriy,
Sunday, October 21, 2012, 1:53:51 AM, you wrote:
>> it_16bit_fanrpm(sc, &sc->sensors[0]);
>> - else
>> + it_generic_svolt(sc, &sc->sensors[5]);
>> + it_generic_svolt(sc, &sc->sensors[14]); <- Looks to be a
>> copy/paste bug ;-)
> Indeed.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:46:34AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:33:22AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > ...
> > So I tried reverting 241749 ... and I failed to reproduce the problem.
> >
> > Well, one boot out of one, at least. I'll try a few more reality
> > check
On 21.10.2012 20:40, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:46:34AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:33:22AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
...
So I tried reverting 241749 ... and I failed to reproduce the problem.
Well, one boot out of one, at least. I'l
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:28:06PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> ...
> I am curious, how to interpret phrase "42=94966796 bytes allocated" in
> log. May be it is just corrupted output, but the number still seems
> quite big, especially for i386 system, making me think about some
> integer over
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:28:06PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> ...
> I am curious, how to interpret phrase "42=94966796 bytes allocated" in
> log. May be it is just corrupted output, but the number still seems
> quite big, especially for i386 system, making me think about some
> integer over
On 21.10.2012 23:23, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:28:06PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
...
I am curious, how to interpret phrase "42=94966796 bytes allocated" in
log. May be it is just corrupted output, but the number still seems
quite big, especially for i386 system, makin
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 07:10:19AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> This seems ... fairly weird to me.
>
> Yesterday, I built & booted:
>
> FreeBSD g1-227.catwhisker.org 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #274
> 241726M: Fri Oct 19 05:40:05 PDT 2012
> r...@g1-227.catwhisker.org:/usr/obj/u
On 22.10.2012 01:03, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 21.10.2012 23:23, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:28:06PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
...
I am curious, how to interpret phrase "42=94966796 bytes allocated" in
log. May be it is just corrupted output, but the number still seems
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:09:08AM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> ...
> This looks a lot like issue you reported a couple of months earlier,
> even affected buffer address matches.
It's a tad scary that someone else notices that sort of thing before I
do. :-}
> At least part of REDZONE metadata pl
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 01:31:04AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> ...
> > I've used your kernel config and my test system was unable to boot from
> > NFS, while GENERIC kernel boots fine. I haven't got panic, but boot just
> > stopped on root mounting. You have so many options specified there so I
Those lines cause this error:
.if ${MK_CTF} != "no"
CTFCONVERT_CMD= ${CTFCONVERT} ${CTFFLAGS} ${.TARGET}
.elif ${MAKE_VERSION} >= 520300
CTFCONVERT_CMD=
.else
CTFCONVERT_CMD= @:
.endif
My make version is 9201206140
So, either the check for >= 520300 is incorrect or change for empty
make va
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 01:31:04AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
>> ...
>> > I've used your kernel config and my test system was unable to boot from
>> > NFS, while GENERIC kernel boots fine. I haven't got panic, but boot just
>> > stopped
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 05:28:49PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> ...
> This is starting to smell a bit like it may be tied to hardware. If
> you have two memory cards, you might want to try swapping them. If
> not, maybe let memtest86 run overnight.
There are 2 SODIMMS, yes.
So I reverted mjg@'s
25 matches
Mail list logo
