[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-01 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-01 10:16:53 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-01 10:16:53 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-01 10

panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock" via cv_timedwait_signal, was "rsync over NFS"

2012-10-01 Thread Rick Macklem
Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > Hi, > > my FreeBSD-9/stable machine (FreeBSD freebsd-tower.goebo.site > 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r241044M: Sat Sep 29 12:52:01 > CEST 2012 l...@freebsd-tower.goebo.site:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > i386) crashes reproducibly when rsync-ing files to an

Re: stable/9 panic Bad tailq NEXT(0xffffffff80e52660->tqh_last) != NULL

2012-10-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 4:53:49 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 10:52 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > > > > > pcib7: irq 19 at device 28.7 on pci0 > > > > panic: Bad tailq NEXT(0x80e52660->tqh_last) != NULL > > > > cpuid = 0 > > > > KDB: stack backtrace: > > > > db_tra

Re: mps in GENERIC, only in amd64? (RELENG_9_1)

2012-10-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, September 29, 2012 5:58:42 am Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Hello, > > accidentally I saw that mps is included in sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC, but > not in sys/i386/conf/GENERIC. > Is this intended? Have you tested it on i386? From the log message, Ken (cc'd) only added it on amd64 as it

Re: panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock" via cv_timedwait_signal, was "rsync over NFS"

2012-10-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, October 01, 2012 8:07:44 am Rick Macklem wrote: > Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > > Hi, > > > > my FreeBSD-9/stable machine (FreeBSD freebsd-tower.goebo.site > > 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r241044M: Sat Sep 29 12:52:01 > > CEST 2012 l...@freebsd-tower.goebo.site:/usr/obj/usr/

Re: atkbd attach excitement during boot

2012-10-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday, September 30, 2012 1:16:23 pm Randy Bush wrote: > booting > > FreeBSD fbsd64.psg.com 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #0 r241020: Fri Sep 28 07:14:15 UTC 2012 r...@kaos.glenbarber.us:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > if i do not type a key during boot (after typing t

Re: atkbd attach excitement during boot

2012-10-01 Thread Randy Bush
>> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >> cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 >> fault virtual address = 0x38 >> fault code = supervisor read data, page not present >> instruction pointer = 0x20:0x80704740 >> stack pointer = 0x28:0x815336e0 >> frame point

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-01 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-01 14:07:03 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-01 14:07:03 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-01 14

Re: panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock" via cv_timedwait_signal, was "rsync over NFS"

2012-10-01 Thread Norbert Aschendorff
On 10/01/2012 02:07 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Is the NFS client using Kerberos or AUTH_SYS for the mount? (And if you > are using Kerberos, have you tried the rsync with an AUTH_SYS mount?) No, it's not using Kerberos. Only network-based access control or however it's called (restricted via client

Re: atkbd attach excitement during boot

2012-10-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, October 01, 2012 9:00:36 am Randy Bush wrote: > >> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > >> cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > >> fault virtual address = 0x38 > >> fault code = supervisor read data, page not present > >> instruction pointer = 0x20:0x80704740

Re: atkbd attach excitement during boot

2012-10-01 Thread Randy Bush
> Humm. It seems this wasn't the actual faulting instruction. Can you do > 'l *0x80704740'? (gdb) l *0x80704740 0x80704740 is in sckbdevent (/usr/src/sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c:743). 738 * the Xaccel-2.1 keyboard hang, but it can't hurt. XXX 739 *

Re: mps in GENERIC, only in amd64? (RELENG_9_1)

2012-10-01 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:49:36 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday, September 29, 2012 5:58:42 am Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > accidentally I saw that mps is included in sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC, but > > not in sys/i386/conf/GENERIC. > > Is this intended? > > Have you teste

Re: mod_auth_kerb2 broken in 8-STABLE? Or is it heimdal to blame?

2012-10-01 Thread George Mamalakis
On 04/07/11 14:08, George Mamalakis wrote: On 06/04/2011 18:29, George Mamalakis wrote: Dear all, I installed mod_auth_kerb2 on my FreeBSD 8-STABLE machine and tried to use it. After the installation (which was successful(?!?)), the server refused to start giving the error: # /usr/local/etc

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-01 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-01 18:01:07 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-01 18:01:07 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-01 18

RE: mps in GENERIC, only in amd64? (RELENG_9_1)

2012-10-01 Thread Desai, Kashyap
> -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth D. Merry > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 8:58 PM > To: John Baldwin > Cc: Harald Schmalzbauer; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: mps in GENERIC, only in

Re: mps in GENERIC, only in amd64? (RELENG_9_1)

2012-10-01 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 23:38:33 +0530, Desai, Kashyap wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth D. Merry > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 8:58 PM > > To: John Baldwin > > Cc: Harald S

Re: mps in GENERIC, only in amd64? (RELENG_9_1)

2012-10-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, October 01, 2012 3:54:50 pm Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 23:38:33 +0530, Desai, Kashyap wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > > sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth D. Merry > > >

Re: mps in GENERIC, only in amd64? (RELENG_9_1)

2012-10-01 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 16:59:58 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, October 01, 2012 3:54:50 pm Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 23:38:33 +0530, Desai, Kashyap wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [mailto:owne

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-01 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-01 21:56:44 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-01 21:56:44 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-01 21

Re: panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock" via cv_timedwait_signal, was "rsync over NFS"

2012-10-01 Thread Rick Macklem
John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, October 01, 2012 8:07:44 am Rick Macklem wrote: > > Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > my FreeBSD-9/stable machine (FreeBSD freebsd-tower.goebo.site > > > 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r241044M: Sat Sep 29 > > > 12:52:01 > > > CEST 2012 > >

ZFS fails to receive valid snapshots (patch included)

2012-10-01 Thread Steven Hartland
Just a quick heads up about an issue we've been seeing here recently where zfs receive fails on valid replication streams. Problem:- When using zfs receive to restore data saved with zfs send there is the possibility that the receive will fail due to replication of snapshots information being pro

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-01 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-02 01:52:25 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-02 01:52:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-02 01

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-01 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-02 05:42:39 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-02 05:42:39 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-02 05