Re: LSI 9240-4i 4K alignment

2012-08-20 Thread Don Lewis
On 19 Aug, Josh Paetzel wrote: > On 08/19/2012 14:04, Steven Hartland wrote: >> HBA's are the way to go if your using ZFS to manage the disks, you only >> need RAID if your using a FS which doesn't manage the disk side well >> such as UFS. >> >> Its often quite common for RAID controllers to actu

Re: LSI 9240-4i 4K alignment

2012-08-20 Thread Josh Paetzel
On 08/20/2012 00:19, Don Lewis wrote: > On 19 Aug, Josh Paetzel wrote: >> On 08/19/2012 14:04, Steven Hartland wrote: > >>> HBA's are the way to go if your using ZFS to manage the disks, you only >>> need RAID if your using a FS which doesn't manage the disk side well >>> such as UFS. >>> >>> Its

Problem with Linux >= 3.3 as NFSv4 server

2012-08-20 Thread Norbert Aschendorff
Hi all, I recently noticed a problem in my network. I use some desktop machines there, two with Linux kernel (Debian and Fedora, both using Kernel 3.5) and a FreeBSD 9.0 (p4) machine. Some days ago, I updated the Debian machine from Kernel 3.2 to Kernel 3.5 (from the experimental branch, 3.5-trunk-

Re: LSI 9240-4i 4K alignment

2012-08-20 Thread Andrew Leonard
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Josh Paetzel wrote: > On the dmesg posted the firmware on the card is phase 11. This *must* > be in lockstep with the driver version or the card may not play nicely. > FreeBSD 8.3 and 9.0 have v13 of the driver, the upcoming 9.1 will have > v14. Note that v14 f

Re: Problem with Linux >= 3.3 as NFSv4 server

2012-08-20 Thread Rick Macklem
Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > Hi all, > I recently noticed a problem in my network. I use some desktop > machines > there, two with Linux kernel (Debian and Fedora, both using Kernel > 3.5) > and a FreeBSD 9.0 (p4) machine. > Some days ago, I updated the Debian machine from Kernel 3.2 to Kernel > 3.