(bsd)tar and multi-volume

2012-06-16 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Hello, according to tar(1), the base system tape archiver is bsdtar since 8.x , which lacks support for multi-volumes. I guess I can easily omit that restriction by installing gtar from archivers/ in the ports collection. Is there any plan to implement split volume support again for the base syst

Stucking processes

2012-06-16 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
Hello all. Since I'm using stable as host, and current in chroot, I'll write to both mail list, sorry for any inconvenience. My host is binary freebsd-updated 9; FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 (GENERIC) #0: Tue Jun 12 02:52:29 UTC 2012 I have chroot with latest current there installed r237089 (make build

Re: mpt: Unable to memory map registers

2012-06-16 Thread Andrey Zonov
On 6/15/12 9:24 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, June 15, 2012 2:12:06 am Andrey Zonov wrote: On 6/13/12 7:10 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 5:57:34 pm Andrey Zonov wrote: On 6/13/12 12:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 3:53:09 pm Andrey Zonov wrote: O

Re: acpidump -dt broken in 9 stable

2012-06-16 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 09:57:45PM -0700, mnln.l4 wrote: > Just upgrade from 9.0 to 9 stable. > > `acpidump -dt` shows error message "realpath tmp file: No such file or > directory" > > It is related to the recent change made to realpath(3) This was a bug/specific operation in acpidump relying o

Re: PF to Preventing SMTP Brute Force Attacks

2012-06-16 Thread Shiv. Nath
> On Jun 15, 2012, at 12:55 PM, Shiv. Nath wrote: > >> # START >> table bruteforce persist >> block in log quick from bruteforce >> >> pass in on $ext_if proto tcp \ >> from any to $ext_if port $trusted_tcp_ports \ >> flags S/SA keep state \ >> (max-src-conn-rate 3/300, overload bruteforce flush g

Re: USE PF to Prevent SMTP Brute Force Attacks - Resolved !!!

2012-06-16 Thread Shiv. Nath
>> Ooops. Yes, -t bruteforce is correct. "expire 604800" means delete >> entries after they've been in the table for that number of seconds (ie >> after one week) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> -- >> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard >>

Re: USE PF to Prevent SMTP Brute Force Attacks - Resolved !!!

2012-06-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/06/2012 21:03, Shiv. Nath wrote: > Dear Metthew, Matthew, one a, one e. > first thanks for assisting to secure 22/25 ports from brute force attack. > i wish to consult if the following white list looks fine to exclude > trusted networks (own network) > > > > int0="em0" > secured_attack_p

ggate problem

2012-06-16 Thread David ROFFIAEN
Hi list, I encoutered a panic with ggatec : I misconfigured gg.exports on the server with bad IP address for allowed client. Resulting a panic when creating ggatec on the client. Investigating the panic a I discovered at line 362 in g_gatec.c, the ggio->gctl_sectorsize variable is not checked t

Re: ggate problem

2012-06-16 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:14:50PM +0200, David ROFFIAEN wrote: > Hi list, > > I encoutered a panic with ggatec : > I misconfigured gg.exports on the server with bad IP address for > allowed client. Resulting a panic when creating ggatec on the > client. > Investigating the panic a I discovered at