Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 05:55:19AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > Hello, > > r232411 broke onboard 1068 detection on all boxes with SuperMicro > X8ST3 motherboards for us. > > All of them are also equipped with two extra 1068 controllers, which > are detected fine. Reverting to r231518 with ot

Contractjobs.com - 250,000 Live Searchable Contractor CVs

2012-04-03 Thread Mitchell Wells
___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:29:27AM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 05:55:19AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > r232411 broke onboard 1068 detection on all boxes with SuperMicro > > X8ST3 motherboards for us. > > > > All of them are also equipped with two ex

RE: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Desai, Kashyap
> -Original Message- > From: Marius Strobl [mailto:mar...@alchemy.franken.de] > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 5:59 PM > To: Desai, Kashyap > Cc: sta...@freebsd.org; zvq...@di.vc; k...@freebsd.org; Andrew Pantyukhin > Subject: Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection > > On Tue, Apr 03,

Re: [stable-ish 9] Dell R815 ipmi(4) attach failure

2012-04-03 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, April 02, 2012 7:27:13 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote: > Doug Ambrisko writes: > | John Baldwin writes: > | | On Saturday, March 31, 2012 3:25:48 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote: > | | > Sean Bruno writes: > | | > | Noting a failure to attach to the onboard IPMI controller with this dell > | | > | R815.

Re: 9-STABLE, ZFS, NFS, ggatec - suspected memory leak

2012-04-03 Thread Oliver Brandmueller
Hi, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:02:03PM +, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-March/239643.html > > Same issue different thread. Different software. > > Its not NFS, its ZFS. > > I don't really have a place to try it on 8.2, but my hunch fr

Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:29:27 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 05:55:19AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > r232411 broke onboard 1068 detection on all boxes with SuperMicro > > X8ST3 motherboards for us. > > > > All of them are also equipped with two extr

Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:13:14AM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:29:27 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 05:55:19AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > r232411 broke onboard 1068 detection on all boxes with SuperMicro > > > X

Re: [stable-ish 9] Dell R815 ipmi(4) attach failure

2012-04-03 Thread Doug Ambrisko
John Baldwin writes: | On Monday, April 02, 2012 7:27:13 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote: | > Doug Ambrisko writes: | > | John Baldwin writes: | > | | On Saturday, March 31, 2012 3:25:48 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote: | > | | > Sean Bruno writes: | > | | > | Noting a failure to attach to the onboard IPMI controlle

RE: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread McConnell, Stephen
Marius, Since the 0x59 device is a MegaRAID device, shouldn't you be using the MegaRAID driver. Why is the MPT driver being used in this case? The problem is that the MPT driver was wrongly attaching to some MegaRAID controllers and that was causing conflict problems, so that was fixed by rem

Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:52:14PM -0600, McConnell, Stephen wrote: > Marius, > > Since the 0x59 device is a MegaRAID device, shouldn't you be using the > MegaRAID driver. Why is the MPT driver being used in this case? The problem > is that the MPT driver was wrongly attaching to some MegaRAID

Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:52:14PM -0600, McConnell, Stephen wrote: >> Marius, >> >> Since the 0x59 device is a MegaRAID device, shouldn't you be using the >> MegaRAID driver.  Why is the MPT driver being used in this case?  The >> problem i

Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:26:38AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Marius Strobl > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:52:14PM -0600, McConnell, Stephen wrote: > >> Marius, > >> > >> Since the 0x59 device is a MegaRAID device, shouldn't you be using the > >> M

Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:26:38AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: >> The device in question is a built-in 1068-based controller on a >> SuperMicro X8ST3 board. >> >> It can be converted to MegaRAID mode with a special addon "button" >> (AOC-I

Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection

2012-04-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:38:54AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Marius Strobl > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:26:38AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > >> The device in question is a built-in 1068-based controller on a > >> SuperMicro X8ST3 board. > >>