9-STABLE, ZFS, NFS, ggatec - suspected memory leak

Hi all, Setup: I'm running 2 machines (amd64, 16GB) with FreeBSD 9-STABLE (Mar 14 so far) acting as NFS servers. They each serve 3 zpools (holding a single zfs, hourly snapshots). The zpools each are 3-way mirrors of ggate devices, each 2 TB, so 2 TB per zpool. Compression is "on" (to save ba

Re: SAS Drive identification LEDs

> > How would you identify such a drive on any other system? > Normally, there are printed labels as the backup solution. Thanks. Fred ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe,

Re: SAS Drive identification LEDs

Fred Liu wrote: How would you identify such a drive on any other system? Normally, there are printed labels as the backup solution. You can identify SAS drives in an enclosure if the drive and enclosure provide the information needed. If you issue an INQUIRY EVPD read of page 0x83 on the

Re: ESCape codes displayed instead of processed in pager

On Mar 29, 2012 5:18 AM, "Jim Bryant" wrote: > > Ever since I have upgraded to 9-stable, I have noticed that the manpages seem to be munged up with displayed instead of processed ESCape codes. I believe that this is due to the terminal type of the console changing from "cons25" to "xterm". If yo

Re: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240 with mfi driver?

On Friday, March 30, 2012 12:06:40 am Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > Hi, > > I have a loan LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-4i controller for testing. > > According to the LSI documentation, this device provides the MegaRAID > interface and the BIOS message mentions MFI. The LSI driver for this device also lists

Re: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240 with mfi driver?

John Baldwin writes: | On Friday, March 30, 2012 12:06:40 am Jan Mikkelsen wrote: | > Hi, | > | > I have a loan LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-4i controller for testing. | > | > According to the LSI documentation, this device provides the MegaRAID | > interface and the BIOS message mentions MFI. The LSI

Re: [stable-ish 9] Dell R815 ipmi(4) attach failure

On Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:48:39 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > Noting a failure to attach to the onboard IPMI controller with this dell > R815. Not sure what to start poking at and thought I'd though this over > here for comment. > > -bash-4.2$ dmesg |grep ipmi > ipmi0: KCS mode found at io 0xca8 on

Re: Floppy disks don't work with FreeBSD 9.0

On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:57:37 pm Thomas Laus wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I'm a bit short on free machines, so the closest I can get right now > > is my everyday machine running from sources cvsupped from > > RELENG_8 3.rd of March: > > > I 'csuped' to FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE today and still had the

Text relocations in kernel modules

As a disclaimer, I would like to clarify that Gentoo/FreeBSD uses a FreeBSD userland and that Gentoo/FreeBSD has nothing to do with Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. People seem to think Gentoo/FreeBSD is related to Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, which has made collaboration difficult. With that said, Gentoo Portage is

Re: ESCape codes displayed instead of processed in pager

Matt Thyer wrote: On Mar 29, 2012 5:18 AM, "Jim Bryant" > wrote: > > Ever since I have upgraded to 9-stable, I have noticed that the manpages seem to be munged up with displayed instead of processed ESCape codes. I believe that this is due to the terminal ty

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:38:14PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > As a disclaimer, I would like to clarify that Gentoo/FreeBSD uses a > FreeBSD userland and that Gentoo/FreeBSD has nothing to do with Debian > GNU/kFreeBSD. People seem to think Gentoo/FreeBSD is related to Debian > GNU/kFreeBSD, which

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

On 03/30/12 15:07, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> Is this a bug? > No. This is by design. > > Why do you consider this a bug ? It occurs on i386, but not amd64. It could be that something is wrong with how things are being compiled i386, or it could be that i386 requires things to be compiled this

Re: [stable-ish 9] Dell R815 ipmi(4) attach failure

On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 09:29 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:48:39 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > > Noting a failure to attach to the onboard IPMI controller with this dell > > R815. Not sure what to start poking at and thought I'd though this over > > here for comment. > > > >

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

On 03/30/12 15:46, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:42:22PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: >> On 03/30/12 15:07, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Is this a bug? >>> No. This is by design. >>> >>> Why do you consider this a bug ? >> >> It occurs on i386, but not amd64. It could be t

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 04:11:29PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > On 03/30/12 15:46, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:42:22PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > >> On 03/30/12 15:07, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Is this a bug? > >>> No. This is by design. > >>> > >>> Why do you

Re: 9-STABLE, ZFS, NFS, ggatec - suspected memory leak

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-March/239643.html Same issue different thread. Different software. Its not NFS, its ZFS. I don't really have a place to try it on 8.2, but my hunch from things I've done rather similarly which don't cause tell me its a new issue in 9.0,

Re: [stable-ish 9] Dell R815 ipmi(4) attach failure

On Friday, March 30, 2012 4:03:54 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 09:29 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:48:39 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > > > Noting a failure to attach to the onboard IPMI controller with this dell > > > R815. Not sure what to start poking at

Re: [stable-ish 9] Dell R815 ipmi(4) attach failure

> This is the relevant bits: > > Handle 0x2600, DMI type 38, 18 bytes > IPMI Device Information > Interface Type: KCS (Keyboard Control Style) > Specification Version: 2.0 > I2C Slave Address: 0x10 > NV Storage Device: Not Present > Base Address: 0x0CA8 (

Re: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240 with mfi driver?

Hi, On 31/03/2012, at 1:14 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote: > John Baldwin writes: > | On Friday, March 30, 2012 12:06:40 am Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > | ... > | > Is this path likely to work out? Any suggestions on where to go from here? > | > | You should try the updated mfi(4) driver that Doug (cc'd) is

Re: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240 with mfi driver?

Jan Mikkelsen writes: | Hi, | | On 31/03/2012, at 1:14 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote: | | > John Baldwin writes: | > | On Friday, March 30, 2012 12:06:40 am Jan Mikkelsen wrote: | > | ... | > | > Is this path likely to work out? Any suggestions on where to go from here? | > | | > | You should try the

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:34:55PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > On 03/30/12 16:36, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > First, there _are_ relocations against text in the amd64 modules, but I > > suspect that your scripts do not detect this. Most likely, scripts look > > for DT_TEXTREL dynamic tag, and ta

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

On 03/30/12 18:46, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Reread what I wrote to you. Also, it pays off learning how ELF works > before making conclusion from the absence of the output of readelf -d. > Amd64 modules _are not_ shared objects. Whether or not they are shared objects is irrelevant. The fact is

Re: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240 with mfi driver?

On 31/03/2012, at 9:21 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote: > Jan Mikkelsen writes: > | I don't know what changes Sean did. Are they in 9.0-release, or do I > | need -stable after a certain point? I'm assuming I should be able to > | take src/sys/dev/mfi/... and src/usr.sbin/mfiutil/... from -current. > >

Re: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240 with mfi driver?

Jan Mikkelsen writes: | On 31/03/2012, at 9:21 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote: | | > Jan Mikkelsen writes: | > | I don't know what changes Sean did. Are they in 9.0-release, or do I | > | need -stable after a certain point? I'm assuming I should be able to | > | take src/sys/dev/mfi/... and src/usr.sbi

Re: LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240 with mfi driver?

On 31/03/2012, at 10:24 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote: > Well, then you can do the performance test of the 9240 on the 9261s > by disabling the battery and the cache! Feel free to do the test on > the 9240. I can't see anything being faster without the NVRAM cache. The other critical part of the test

Re: ESCape codes displayed instead of processed in pager

On Mar 31, 2012 5:02 AM, "Jim Bryant" @ gmail.com > wrote: > > Matt Thyer wrote: > >> >> On Mar 29, 2012 5:18 AM, "Jim Bryant" >> @ gmail.com @ gmail.com >> wrote: >> > >> > Ever since I have upgraded to 9-stable, I have noticed that the manpages seem to be munged up with displayed instead of

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Richard Yao wrote: > On 03/30/12 18:46, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> Reread what I wrote to you. Also, it pays off learning how ELF works >> before making conclusion from the absence of the output of readelf -d. >> Amd64 modules _are not_ shared objects. > > Wheth

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:51 PM, wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:47:15PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: >> On 03/30/12 18:46, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> > Reread what I wrote to you. Also, it pays off learning how ELF works >> > before making conclusion from the absence of the output of readelf

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

On 03/30/12 22:15, Peter Wemm wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Richard Yao wrote: >> On 03/30/12 18:46, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> Reread what I wrote to you. Also, it pays off learning how ELF works >>> before making conclusion from the absence of the output of readelf -d. >>> Amd64

Re: FreeBSD 8.3 and 9.0 freeze with firefox

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:41:54AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday 30 March 2012 09:28:06 Joseph Olatt wrote: > > > > Starting with 8.3, I've been experiencing FreeBSD freezing up completely > > after using firefox for a while. Thinking the problem would go away if I > > upgrade