Re: flowtable usable or not

You haven't been bitten by the storage layer or filesystem hackery bits which has caused filesystem corruption. :) That said, FFS+SUJ has made recover-from-kernel-panic so much less painful. Thankyou Jeffr and others! What I tend to do is either run current on a VM or organise some dedicated -cur

Re: flowtable usable or not

On 3/6/2012 2:12 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > You haven't been bitten by the storage layer or filesystem hackery > bits which has caused filesystem corruption. :) Ummm, I have, actually. I was one of the early adopters of SU+J and complained loudly when it ate my /var/ for lunch. I also use a lot of

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-03-06 07:08:02 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-06 07:08:02 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-03-06 07:08:02 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-06 07:08:57 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-06 07:08:57 - /usr/b

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

Xin Li wrote: > On 03/05/12 14:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is > > out. All the system were installed through the standard > > installation procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or > > power-failure, I get a huge a

Re: lock violation in unionfs (9.0-STABLE r230270)

mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfe01d96704f0 is not exclusive locked but should be KDB: enter: lock violation Pavel, can you give a spin to this patch?: http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/unionfs_missing_insmntque_lock.patch I think that the un

Re: Intel(R) PRO/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapter not working properly

Thanks Herbert. I bought another Intel CT to test and it work flawlessly, so it was a bad PT adapter. On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:39:01 +0800 > Irjohn Junus wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This was originally posted here: > > http://forums.freebsd

HEADS UP: FreeBSD 7.3 EoL coming soon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, On March 31st, FreeBSD 7.3 will reach its End of Life and will no longer be supported by the FreeBSD Security Team. Users of FreeBSD 7.3 are strongly encouraged to upgrade to FreeBSD 7.4, FreeBSD 8.1, FreeBSD 8.2, or FreeBSD 9.0 befor

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-03-06 13:32:24 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-06 13:32:24 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-03-06 13:32:24 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-06 13:33:23 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-06 13:33:23 - /usr/b

Re: msk0: interrupt storm

On Thursday, March 01, 2012 8:29:55 pm YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:03:29AM +0400, Pavel Gorshkov wrote: > > My laptop running 9.0-RELEASE/amd64/GENERIC freezes and > > (sometimes) unfreezes intermittently, logging the following: > > > > Feb 28 23:07:36 lifebook kernel: inter

9-stable: what happened to geom_labels?

A new install of 9-release, updated to 9-stable today with the GENERIC kernel. gpart show -l shows GPT labels, yet there isn't even a /dev/gpt directory. Has something changed with labels? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

Le mar 6 mar 12 à 10:41:16 +0100, Julian H. Stacey écrivait : > A German magazine (CT) reported on placebo cache chips some > years back, chips with pins but no silicon inside. This one is original, at least:

geli keyfiles won't load automatically at boot time

Whether I boot from an unencrypted UFS partition or from a CD, I cannot get the boot loader to load my geli keyfiles automatically. I always have to interrupt the boot process and issue "load_geli" commands for each provider and its corresponding keyfile. Other settings in /boot/loader.conf get r

FreeBSD 8.2 - active plus inactive memory leak!?

Hi all, I'm having some trouble with some production 8.2-RELEASE servers where the 'Active' and 'Inact' memory values reported by top don't seem to correspond with the processes which are running on the machine. I have two near-identical machines (with slightly different workloads); on one, let's

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-03-06 19:44:36 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-06 19:44:36 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-03-06 19:44:36 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-06 19:45:53 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-06 19:45:53 - /usr/b

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le mar 6 mar 12 à 10:41:16 +0100, Julian H. Stacey > écrivait : > > > A German magazine (CT) reported on placebo cache chips some > > years back, chips with pins but no silicon inside. > > This one is original, at least: >

RE: geli keyfiles won't load automatically at boot time

> -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > xenophon\+freebsd > Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2012 5:03 AM > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: geli keyfiles won't load automatically at boot time > > Whether I

ixgbe v2.3.11 won't negotiate LACP, v2.4.4 does

I have a few systems with Intel X520-DA2 PCIe network cards (10 Gig). The problem I've been running into is with a fresh 9.0-STABLE or 9.0-RELEASE install. I can't get a LACP connection established over the ix0 and ix1 ports. It's showing COLLECTING and DISTRIBUTING, but not ACTIVE. I've notic

Re: FreeBSD 8.2 - active plus inactive memory leak!?

Thanks for your email, Chuck. > > Conversely, if a page *does not* occur in the resident > > memory of any process, it must not occupy any space in the active + > > inactive lists. > > Hmm...if a process gets swapped out entirely, the pages for it will be moved > to the cache list, flushed, and

Re: FreeBSD 8.2 - active plus inactive memory leak!?

On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 19:13 +, Luke Marsden wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm having some trouble with some production 8.2-RELEASE servers where > the 'Active' and 'Inact' memory values reported by top don't seem to > correspond with the processes which are running on the machine. I have > two near-id

FreeBSD 8.3-RC1 Available...

The first Release Candidate build of the 8.3-RELEASE release cycle is now available on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, and pc98 architectures. The MD5/SHA256 sums are at the bottom of this message. The ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images are available h

add k3772z 3g modem support for FreeBSD-9

Hi all! I wrote a patch, to add support for Vodafone K3772-Z 3g modem. -- Oliver Pinter (Tresorium) commit 092aa1246e1dde0ffe11a7bc06b540f4fa5851c9 Author: Oliver Pinter Date: Wed Mar 7 01:47:51 2012 +0100 added support for Vodafone 3772-Z to u3g driver ugen1.2: at usbus1 u

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-03-07 01:46:26 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-03-07 01:46:26 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-03-07 01:46:26 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-03-07 01:47:21 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-03-07 01:47:21 - /usr/b

Re: msk0: interrupt storm

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:36:05AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, March 01, 2012 8:29:55 pm YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:03:29AM +0400, Pavel Gorshkov wrote: > > > My laptop running 9.0-RELEASE/amd64/GENERIC freezes and > > > (sometimes) unfreezes intermittently,

Re: ixgbe v2.3.11 won't negotiate LACP, v2.4.4 does

Never rains but it pours, this is the second request today :) Yes, I will do an MFC as soon as quickly as I am able. Jack On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Chris Forgeron wrote: > I have a few systems with Intel X520-DA2 PCIe network cards (10 Gig). > > The problem I've been running into is wit