Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Erich Dollansky < erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday 24 February 2012 04:21:12 Peter Maloney wrote: > > Am 23.02.2012 21:15, schrieb Mark Felder: > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:25:01 -0600, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> Now, I find

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

Hi, On Friday 24 February 2012 15:34:06 Andreas Nilsson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Erich Dollansky < > erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com> wrote: > > > On Friday 24 February 2012 04:21:12 Peter Maloney wrote: > > > Am 23.02.2012 21:15, schrieb Mark Felder: > > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Peter Maloney wrote: > I suggest these concepts should be tested: > > Perhaps the testers tested beta1 and beta2, but there were so many > changes after beta2, that bugs appeared in release that did not exist in > beta2. Test this by reproducing things reported in

Another ZFS ARC memory question

Hi all, Just wanted to get your opinion on best practices for ZFS. We're running 8.2-RELEASE v15 in production on 24GB RAM amd64 machines but have been having trouble with short spikes in application memory usage resulting in huge amounts of swapping, bringing the whole machine to its knees and c

Re: another panic in 8.3-PRERELEASE

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:45:58PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Hi, > > This is another reproducible panic. This seems to happen only when > top(1) is running for a long time (a sysctl() call for > CTL_KERN.KERN_PROC.KERN_PROC_PROC MIB triggered it). > > > pool.allbsd.org dumped core - se

Re: another panic in 8.3-PRERELEASE

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:33:36PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:45:58PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is another reproducible panic. This seems to happen only when > > top(1) is running for a long time (a sysctl() call for > > CTL_KERN.KERN_PR

Re: random problem with 8.3 from yesterday

On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 13:50 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday 23 February 2012 20:22:57 Stefan Bethke wrote: > > Am 22.02.2012 um 07:34 schrieb Erich Dollansky: > > > > > > > > tunefs -L NewDeviceName /dev/da0a > > > > > > Either this call or the mount command does not work ra

Re: Regression in 8.2-STABLE bge code (from 7.4-STABLE)

On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 7:56:00 pm YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 09:24:53PM -0500, Michael L. Squires wrote: > > Sorry for late reply. Had been busy due to relocation. > > > There is a bug in the Tyan S4881/S4882 PCI-X bridges that was fixed with a > > patch in 7.x (than

Re: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited

On Thursday, February 23, 2012 8:22:07 am Desai, Kashyap wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Konstantin Belousov [mailto:kostik...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 2:55 PM > > To: Desai, Kashyap > > Cc: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable; Justin T. Gibbs; Kennet

Re: another panic in 8.3-PRERELEASE

Konstantin Belousov wrote in <20120224150259.gv55...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>: ko> > > #19 0x000800abecfc in ?? () ko> > > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) ko> > > (kgdb) ko> > Can you, please, print out the content of *td, e.g. from the frame 16 ? ko> ko> And *req fro

Re: The "New BSD Installer" thread has shown me that I am totally obsolete in disk partitioning.

2012/2/20 Peter Maloney > Am 17.02.2012 21:08, schrieb Edwin L. Culp W.: > > If such a thing exists, I need a howto in mixing and matching all the > > different partitioning options and combinations, pro's and con's, for as > > many modern situations as possible. Any suggestions appreciated. > T

RE: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Desai, Kashyap wrote: From: Alexander Kabaev [mailto:kab...@gmail.com] ... sleep locks are by definition unbound. There is no spinning, no priority propagation. Holders are free to take, say, page faults and go to long journey to disk and back, etc. I understood your above

Re: Inconsistent utx.active?

Hi Vlad, > Has anyone else noticed erratic bookkeeping by utmpx in RELENG_9? Would you mind explaining to me what you're seeing? It's hard for me to fix bugs if I don't get proper reports. -- Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ pgpcKCladCJsr.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: random problem with 8.3 from yesterday

on 24/02/2012 18:23 Ian Lepore said the following: > I've always > suspected something in the geom layer isn't noticing that a CF or SD > card in the reader got removed/inserted/reformatted, and un-/re-plugging > the whole reader (making the cam layer destroy and recreate the devices) > makes geom

Re: Inconsistent utx.active?

Hi Vlad, * Vlad Galu , 20120224 23:35: > Yes, sorry about that. I'm seeing stale (which sometimes turn into > duplicate) entries when I log off and on again. The symptom seems to > be exacerbated by unclean logouts (such as when my stateful corporate > firewall kills my SSH s

Re: Inconsistent utx.active?

On Friday, February 24, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi Vlad, > > * Vlad Galu mailto:d...@dudu.ro)>, 20120224 23:35: > > Yes, sorry about that. I'm seeing stale (which sometimes turn into > > duplicate) entries when I log off and on again. The symptom s

Re: Inconsistent utx.active?

On Friday, February 24, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi Vlad, > > > Has anyone else noticed erratic bookkeeping by utmpx in RELENG_9? > > Would you mind explaining to me what you're seeing? It's hard for me to > fix bugs if I don't get proper reports. > > -- > Ed Schouten mailto:e.

Re: Inconsistent utx.active?

Hello Vlad, * Vlad Galu , 20120224 23:54: > [1330014380.652067 -- Thu Feb 23 17:26:20 2012] user process: > id="4f86d023f250d3c9" pid="39012" user="dudu" line="pts/0" host="A.B.C.D" > [1330014398.177818 -- Thu Feb 23 17:26:38 2012] us

Re: Inconsistent utx.active?

On Friday, February 24, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hello Vlad, > > * Vlad Galu mailto:d...@dudu.ro)>, 20120224 23:54: > > [1330014380.652067 -- Thu Feb 23 17:26:20 2012] user process: > > id="4f86d023f250d3c9" pid="39012" user="dudu&qu

Re: random problem with 8.3 from yesterday

On Friday 24 February 2012 23:23:53 Ian Lepore wrote: > On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 13:50 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, > > On Thursday 23 February 2012 20:22:57 Stefan Bethke wrote: > > > Am 22.02.2012 um 07:34 schrieb Erich Dollansky: > > > > tunefs -L NewDeviceName /dev/da0a > > > >

Re: random problem with 8.3 from yesterday

On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 00:39 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 24/02/2012 18:23 Ian Lepore said the following: > > I've always > > suspected something in the geom layer isn't noticing that a CF or SD > > card in the reader got removed/inserted/reformatted, and un-/re-plugging > > the whole reader (mak

Re: Regression in 8.2-STABLE bge code (from 7.4-STABLE)

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:46:20AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 7:56:00 pm YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 09:24:53PM -0500, Michael L. Squires wrote: > > > > Sorry for late reply. Had been busy due to relocation. > > > > > There is a bug in the Ty

geom vs. removable disks/cards (was: Re: random problem with 8.3 from yesterday)

In article <1330126840.7317.60.ca...@revolution.hippie.lan> you write: >On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 00:39 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 24/02/2012 18:23 Ian Lepore said the following: >> > I've always >> > suspected something in the geom layer isn't noticing that a CF or SD >> > card in the reader got