Re: nmbclusters: how do we want to fix this for 8.3 ?

Le 22 févr. 2012 à 22:51, Jack Vogel a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:09:46PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 21:52 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> ... I have hit this problem recently, too. Maybe the is

Re: nmbclusters: how do we want to fix this for 8.3 ?

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Fabien Thomas wrote: > > Le 22 févr. 2012 à 22:51, Jack Vogel a écrit : > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:09:46PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 21:52 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:18:08AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting "Bjoern A. Zeeb" (from Wed, > 22 Feb 2012 22:31:36 +): > > > On 21. Feb 2012, at 13:35 , Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > >> You can download from > >> http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/current-patches/ > >> The

Re: Can't read a full block, only got 8193 bytes.

On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:10, Artem Belevich wrote: [...] >> "Can't read a full block, only got 8193 bytes." > > That's probably just a side effect of ZFS checksum errors. ZFS will > happily read the file until it hits a record with checksum. If > redundant info is available (raidz or mirror), ZFS

Re: panic in 8.3-PRERELEASE

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:53:55PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 2:24:14 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:29:40AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > Hiroki Sato wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Just a repor

Re: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:52:12AM +0530, Desai, Kashyap wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Konstantin Belousov [mailto:kostik...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 12:45 AM > > To: Desai, Kashyap > > Cc: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable; Justin T. Gibbs; Ke

Re: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited

Hi Kashyap, * Desai, Kashyap , 20120222 18:51: > Adding Ed Schouten and Jorg Wunsch as I see there are author of > msleep/mtx related APIs. Am I? :-) > 1. When any irq is register with FreeBSD OS, it sets " TDP_NOSLEEPING" > pflag. It means though irq in freebsd is treated as thread, > We canno

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

Quoting ~Lst (from Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:53:56 +0700): It's typo too .. net.inet.ip.stealth: IP stealth mode, no TTL decrementation on forwarding In your file's (i386|amd64)__SMALL_loader.conf : # Disable stealth forwarding and flowtable. net.inet.ip.stealt=0 net.inet6.ip6.stealt=0 Fixed. T

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

Quoting "Bjoern A. Zeeb" (from Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:31:36 +): On 21. Feb 2012, at 13:35 , Alexander Leidinger wrote: You can download from http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/current-patches/ The files are - i386_SMALL - i386_SMALL_loader.conf - amd64_SMALL - amd64_SMALL_loader.conf

RE: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited

> -Original Message- > From: Ed Schouten [mailto:e...@80386.nl] > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 3:16 PM > To: Desai, Kashyap > Cc: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable; jo...@freebsd.org; Kenneth > D. Merry; McConnell, Stephen; Justin T. Gibbs > Subject: Re: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep

RE: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited

> -Original Message- > From: Konstantin Belousov [mailto:kostik...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 2:55 PM > To: Desai, Kashyap > Cc: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable; Justin T. Gibbs; Kenneth > D. Merry; McConnell, Stephen > Subject: Re: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep, but

Re: random problem with 8.3 from yesterday

Am 22.02.2012 um 07:34 schrieb Erich Dollansky: > > tunefs -L NewDeviceName /dev/da0a > > Either this call or the mount command does not work randomly. > > When I then try to mount the device on /dev/da0a it does not work always. > > I do not know what this causes, I am only randomly able to r

Re: panic in 8.3-PRERELEASE

Rick Macklem wrote in <476361430.1773817.1329954835308.javamail.r...@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>: rm> John Baldwin wrote: rm> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 2:24:14 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote: rm> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:29:40AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: rm> > > > Hiroki Sato wrote: rm> >

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

missing in loader.conf geom_part_gpt_load="YES" geom_label_load="YES" -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/CFT-modular-kernel-config-tp5502195p5508227.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

another panic in 8.3-PRERELEASE

Hi, This is another reproducible panic. This seems to happen only when top(1) is running for a long time (a sysctl() call for CTL_KERN.KERN_PROC.KERN_PROC_PROC MIB triggered it). pool.allbsd.org dumped core - see /var/crash/vmcore.0 Thu Feb 23 23:21:52 JST 2012 FreeBSD pool.allbsd.org

SmartyMee

PRESS RELEASE - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Smartymee.com – the perfect solution for monetizing your courseware and tutorials Berlin, Germany — January 24, 2012 — the guys from http://sciencestage.com, the leading international community for academic video streaming, are launching a new product call

Re: nmbclusters: how do we want to fix this for 8.3 ?

On 23/02/2012 09:19, Fabien Thomas wrote: > I think this is more reasonable to setup interface with one queue. Unfortunately, the moment you do that, two things will happen: 1) users will start complaining again how FreeBSD is slow 2) the setting will be come a "sacred cow" and nobody will change

Re: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited

On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:45:29 +0530 "Desai, Kashyap" wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ed Schouten [mailto:e...@80386.nl] > > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 3:16 PM > > To: Desai, Kashyap > > Cc: freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable; jo...@freebsd.org; > > Kenneth D. Mer

Re: nmbclusters: how do we want to fix this for 8.3 ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/22/2012 13:51, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Luigi Rizzo > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:09:46PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 21:52 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote

Re: nmbclusters: how do we want to fix this for 8.3 ?

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 07:19, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 23/02/2012 09:19, Fabien Thomas wrote: >> I think this is more reasonable to setup interface with one queue. > > Unfortunately, the moment you do that, two things will happen: > 1) users will start complaining again how FreeBSD is slow > 2) the

8.3-PRERELEASE panic in linux emulation

Hi! I get a consistent panic when starting acroread after updating to 8.3-PRERELEASE. An 8.2-STABLE from Feb 4th was OK. Can provide more info if needed. Bengt FreeBSD xx.yy.zz 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #13 r231999: Wed Feb 22 21:01:38 CET 2012 ben...@p142.sics.se:/usr/obj/usr

Inconsistent utx.active?

Hi, Has anyone else noticed erratic bookkeeping by utmpx in RELENG_9? Thanks, Vlad -- Good, fast & cheap. Pick any two. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail

FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

Hello list, This is NOT a troll. This is NOT a flame. Do NOT hijack this thread to troll/flame. I'm writing this in light of the *many* problem reports I see on the lists with 9.0-RELEASE. I'm getting extremely worried here. Short introduction in order: See, we use FreeBSD at work for

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:25, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > Now, I find the number of problem reports regarding 9.0-RELEASE alarming > and I'm growing more and more fearful towards it. > > In the current state of things, I have *absolutely* no wish to run it in > production :( > > I'd love to hear fe

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

On 2/24/2012 1:39, Kurt Buff wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:25, Damien Fleuriot wrote: Now, I find the number of problem reports regarding 9.0-RELEASE alarming and I'm growing more and more fearful towards it. In the current state of things, I have *absolutely* no wish to run it in produc

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

On 2/24/2012 1:39, Kurt Buff wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:25, Damien Fleuriot wrote: Now, I find the number of problem reports regarding 9.0-RELEASE alarming and I'm growing more and more fearful towards it. In the current state of things, I have *absolutely* no wish to run it in produc

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:25:01 +0100 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > In the current state of things, I have *absolutely* no wish to run it in > production :( Nobody forces you to jump onto the 9.0-release bandwagon. You can choose to skip it. If you skip 9.0 - will you be better prepared and less fea

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:25:01 -0600, Damien Fleuriot wrote: Now, I find the number of problem reports regarding 9.0-RELEASE alarming and I'm growing more and more fearful towards it. Then stick with the 8.x train until it's no longer supported. Also, don't you know the rule about running .0

Re: "File too large" error when appending to a file of 130 MB

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:05:16PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > Sorry, I have no idea. Maybe one of the ZFS folks knows when ACLs > are generated. (It might happen as a side effect of a "chmod". You > could experiment with that?) Interestingly, such ACLs only appear on my nullfs mounted ZFS d

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

Am 23.02.2012 21:15, schrieb Mark Felder: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:25:01 -0600, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > >> >> Now, I find the number of problem reports regarding 9.0-RELEASE alarming >> and I'm growing more and more fearful towards it. > > Then stick with the 8.x train until it's no longer suppor

RE: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited

> -Original Message- > From: Alexander Kabaev [mailto:kab...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 8:42 PM > To: Desai, Kashyap > Cc: Ed Schouten; freebsd-stable; jo...@freebsd.org; Kenneth D. Merry; > freebsd-s...@freebsd.org; Justin T. Gibbs; McConnell, Stephen > Subject: Re: m

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

> Short introduction in order: > > See, we use FreeBSD at work for our firewall boxes, running: > - PF + CARP + PFsync > - nagios-nrpe > - munin-node > - bacula client > > and either > - nginx and/or haproxy > - relayd > > These boxes serve as frontend firewalls for all our projects/products, > inc

Re: Fatal trap 19, Stopped at bge_init_locked+ and bge booting problems

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 07:41:25AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: > On 02/23/12 21:44, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >I have to ask more information for the controller to Broadcom. > >Not sure whether I can get some hint at this moment though. :-( > Is there anything I can do? I ask this because I have to giv

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

Hi, On Friday 24 February 2012 01:25:01 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > This is NOT a troll. > This is NOT a flame. > Do NOT hijack this thread to troll/flame. > allow them some fun too. > > > Now, I find the number of problem reports regarding 9.0-RELEASE alarming > and I'm growing more and more f

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

Hi Damien, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > I'm writing this in light of the *many* problem reports I see on the > lists with 9.0-RELEASE. > > I'm getting extremely worried here. > .. > See, we use FreeBSD at work for our firewall boxes, running: > .. > These boxes serve

Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports

Hi, On Friday 24 February 2012 04:21:12 Peter Maloney wrote: > Am 23.02.2012 21:15, schrieb Mark Felder: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:25:01 -0600, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > >> > >> Now, I find the number of problem reports regarding 9.0-RELEASE alarming > >> and I'm growing more and more fearful

Re: random problem with 8.3 from yesterday

Hi, On Thursday 23 February 2012 20:22:57 Stefan Bethke wrote: > Am 22.02.2012 um 07:34 schrieb Erich Dollansky: > > > > > tunefs -L NewDeviceName /dev/da0a > > > > Either this call or the mount command does not work randomly. > > > > When I then try to mount the device on /dev/da0a it does no