Are there any committers willing to merge PR misc/124164 to stable/8
before the 8.3 release freeze? It's already in HEAD and stable/9 so it's
had some testing.
misc/124164 adds support for SHA256/512 to crypt(3). This is something
we make use of on Linux and FreeBSD 9, and it'd be great to have th
On 2/7/12 1:50 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 06/02/2012 07:52 Julian Elischer said the following:
so if I'm sitting still in the debugger for too long, a hardclock
event happens that goes into ULE, which then hits the following KASSERT.
KASSERT(pri>= PRI_MIN_BATCH&& pri<= PRI_MAX
Hi.
On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[output snipped]
Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
Just case, do you have ZFS dedup enabled by a chance?
I think that examination of vmstat -m and vmstat -z outputs may provide some
clues as to what got all that memory wired
Tim Bishop writes:
> Are there any committers willing to merge PR misc/124164 to stable/8
> before the 8.3 release freeze? It's already in HEAD and stable/9 so it's
> had some testing.
>
> misc/124164 adds support for SHA256/512 to crypt(3). This is something
> we make use of on Linux and FreeBSD
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:31:44 +0600 "Eugene M. Zheganin"
wrote:
> swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer
>
> Since it's swapping on zvol, it looks to me like it could be the
> mentioned in another thread here ("Swap on zvol - recommendable?")
> resource starvation issue; may be it happens faster wh
Hello,
I tried freebsd-i18n but no one answered, so i will try better luck here. Sorry
for the people who are subscribed to both lists.
- Forwarded message from Victor Balada Diaz -
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:17:21 +0100
From: Victor Balada Diaz
To: freebsd-i...@freebsd.org
Subject: i18n
Hi Victor,
Try setting tomcat7_java_opts="-Dfile.encoding=UTF-8" in /etc/rc.conf.
It works for us under 8.2.
Kind regards,
David.
El 08/02/2012, a les 13:11, Victor Balada Diaz va escriure:
> Hello,
>
> I tried freebsd-i18n but no one answered, so i will try better luck here.
> Sorry
> for t
On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:16:15 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wrote:
>
> It's devd, IMO. Hey, come to think of it, I did enter a PR, the one
> above. If this is still a problem in 9 (which I can test in a bit),
> posting to -current might get some needed attention on it.
PR updated.
--
Torfinn
__
Hi.
On 08.02.2012 18:15, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
I can't remember to have seen any mention of SWAP on ZFS being safe
now. So if nobody can provide a reference to a place which tells that
the problems with SWAP on ZFS are fixed:
1. do not use SWAP on ZFS
2. see 1.
3. check if you see the
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> On 08.02.2012 18:15, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> I can't remember to have seen any mention of SWAP on ZFS being safe
>> now. So if nobody can provide a reference to a place which tells that
>> the problems with SWAP on ZFS are fixed:
>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin
> wrote:
>> On 08.02.2012 18:15, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> I can't remember to have seen any mention of SWAP on ZFS being safe
>>> now. So if nobody can provide a reference to a place
on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
> Hi.
>
> On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> [output snipped]
>>
>> Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
>> Just case, do you have ZFS dedup enabled by a chance?
>>
>> I think that examination of vmstat -m an
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:29:36PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> [output snipped]
> >>
> >> Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
> >> Just case, do you have
I have a 4 port eSata PCIe card with 3 external port multipliers attached on an
AMD64 box (8G of RAM), RELENG8 from Feb1st.
siis0@pci0:5:0:0: class=0x010400 card=0x71241095 chip=0x31241095 rev=0x02
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Silicon Image Inc (Was: CMD Technology Inc)'
device = 'PC
on 08/02/2012 22:50 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> Politely -- recommending this to a user is a good choice of action, but
> the problem is that no user, even an experienced user, is going to know
> what all of the "Types" (vmstat -m) or "ITEMs" (vmstat -z) correlate
> with on the system.
I
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:00:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I have a 4 port eSata PCIe card with 3 external port multipliers attached on
> an AMD64 box (8G of RAM), RELENG8 from Feb1st.
>
> siis0@pci0:5:0:0: class=0x010400 card=0x71241095 chip=0x31241095
> rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
> vendor
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:27:23PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:00:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > Ever since I added a new PM, I have been seeing a new error (READ LOG EXT)
> > along with a the odd slot timeout error.
BTW, something I forgot to cover in my reply:
On 08.02.2012 23:27, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:00:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I have a 4 port eSata PCIe card with 3 external port multipliers attached on an
AMD64 box (8G of RAM), RELENG8 from Feb1st.
siis0@pci0:5:0:0: class=0x010400 card=0x71241095 chip=0x312
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:22:40AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 08.02.2012 23:27, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:00:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >>I have a 4 port eSata PCIe card with 3 external port multipliers attached
> >>on an AMD64 box (8G of RAM), RELENG8 from
On 09.02.2012 00:38, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:22:40AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 08.02.2012 23:27, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:00:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I have a 4 port eSata PCIe card with 3 external port multipliers attached on an
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
Hi.
On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[output snipped]
Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
Just case, do you have ZFS dedup enabled by a chance?
I think that examination of vmstat -m
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
> >>Hi.
> >>
> >>On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>>[output snipped]
> >>>
> >>>Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
...
>> ARC Size:
>> Current Size: 1769 MB (arcsize)
>> Target Size (Adaptive): 512 MB (c)
>> Min Size (Hard Limit): 512 MB (zfs_arc
On 2/8/2012 4:27 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> This indicates the controller on channel 1 (siisch1) is "stalled"
> waiting for underlying communication with the device attached to it.
Hi,
But which device ? the PM itself, or the disks behind it ? And which
disk ?
>
>
> This is almost
Artem Belevich wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
...
ARC Size:
Current Size: 1769 MB (arcsize)
Target Size (Adaptive): 512 MB (c)
Min Size (Hard Limit):
On Feb 8, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[output snipped]
Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
Just c
On Feb 8, 2012, at 7:43 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> ...
>>> ARC Size:
>>> Current Size: 1769 MB (arcsize)
>>> Target Size (Adaptive): 51
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:18:02PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 08/02/2012 22:50 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> > Politely -- recommending this to a user is a good choice of action, but
> > the problem is that no user, even an experienced user, is going to know
> > what all of the "Types"
Hi.
On 09.02.2012 02:29, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
Hi.
On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[output snipped]
Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
Just case, do you have ZFS dedup enabled by a chance?
I think that
29 matches
Mail list logo
