On 22/01/2012 05:32, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> csup then pulls down src/some/Makefile (for RELENG_9), where the version
> number is different; say, version 1.14.3.0. Note that the version
> number is not "higher" (larger) than the previous (1.14.12.3). Thus
> /usr/src/some/Makefile doesn't get cha
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:47:47 +1100 (EST), Ian Smith wrote
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, mato wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:57:05 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On 01/21/12 21:34, mato wrote:
> > > > I've used freebsd-update to upgrade from 8.2-R to 9.0-R and
> all looked nic
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 09:09:03AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 22/01/2012 05:32, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > csup then pulls down src/some/Makefile (for RELENG_9), where the version
> > number is different; say, version 1.14.3.0. Note that the version
> > number is not "higher" (larger) than
Hello, I'd like to know is there any good way to implement make -s
behaivor as a default, 'cos in man make.conf & examplet/etc/make.conf
there's no anything about it. In most cases I just don't want to see
echo output of make. I've added an alias to .cshrc like this^
alias make make -s \!:1
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:04:06 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 01:37:31PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > fresh csup, multiple am64 machines trying to go from 8.2 to 9.0
> >
> > it is also on an one i386 running 9.0
> >
> > FreeBSD psg.com 9.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE
Cross-building went fine (buildworld, buildkernel), but making the
USB-image seems to not work (At least on my system)
make release TARGET=powerpc TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64
__MAKE_CONF=/dev/null SRCCONF=/dev/null NOPORTS=1 NOSRC=1
...
sh /usr/src/release/powerpc/make-memstick.sh
/usr/obj/usr/src/relea
On 22.01.2012 07:54, Michael BlackHeart wrote:
Hello, I'd like to know is there any good way to implement make -s
behaivor as a default, 'cos in man make.conf & examplet/etc/make.conf
there's no anything about it. In most cases I just don't want to see
echo output of make. I've added an alias to
On 22.01.2012 03:54, Michael BlackHeart wrote:
Hello, I'd like to know is there any good way to implement make -s
behaivor as a default, 'cos in man make.conf & examplet/etc/make.conf
there's no anything about it. In most cases I just don't want to see
echo output of make. I've added an alias to
On 12.01.2012 15:52, Doug Barton wrote:
chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr
rm -rf /usr/obj/usr
It's much faster to do:
/bin/rm -rf ${obj}/* 2> /dev/null || /bin/chflags -R 0 ${obj}/* &&
/bin/rm -rf ${obj}/*
If I could just add one thing here, for those who might be tempted
to immediately cut and
On 22/01/2012 19:00, clift...@volcano.org wrote:
> If rm had an option to take files from standard input, or if
> there's another program I'm not aware of which does this, it
> could serve as the right-hand side of this.
xargs(1) -- generic solution to taking a list of command arguments from
a fil
On 22.01.2012 13:16, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 22/01/2012 19:00, clift...@volcano.org wrote:
If rm had an option to take files from standard input, or if
there's another program I'm not aware of which does this, it
could serve as the right-hand side of this.
xargs(1) -- generic solution to taki
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 01:00:46PM -0600, clift...@volcano.org wrote:
> On 12.01.2012 15:52, Doug Barton wrote:
> >>> chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr
> >>> rm -rf /usr/obj/usr
> > It's much faster to do:
> > /bin/rm -rf ${obj}/* 2> /dev/null || /bin/chflags -R 0 ${obj}/* &&
> > /bin/rm -rf ${obj}/
> I have this problem on two of my systems. Yesterday I was trying my
> weekly update on a i386 9.0 stable and had this failure. This morning
> on my i386 8.2 stable I had the same failure.
>
> I csup'd the sources again and it found no changes. I the changed my
> supfile from mirro 10 to mirror 5
On 01/22/2012 11:00, clift...@volcano.org wrote:
> On 12.01.2012 15:52, Doug Barton wrote:
chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr
rm -rf /usr/obj/usr
>>
>> It's much faster to do:
>>
>> /bin/rm -rf ${obj}/* 2> /dev/null || /bin/chflags -R 0 ${obj}/* &&
>> /bin/rm -rf ${obj}/*
>
> If I could just
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I suspect that most VB users on FreeBSD use it to get access to a small
> number of took on Windows...the ones in Office. It's still better than
> either LibreOffice or OpenOffice.org for either documents or presentations,
> especially presen
15 matches
Mail list logo
