On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:37:34PM +1100, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> The manual states that dumpdev "AUTO is the default as of FreeBSD 6.0" [1]
>
> However:
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD xx 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC
> 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/o
On 17/01/12 7:10 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:37:34PM +1100, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
The manual states that dumpdev "AUTO is the default as of FreeBSD 6.0" [1]
However:
# uname -a
FreeBSD xx 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r.
On 17/01/2012 08:43, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> The dumpon utility will refuse to enable a dump device which is
> smaller
> than the total amount of physical memory as reported by the hw.physmem
> sysctl(8) variable.
>
> However, I have found that
>
> # dumpon -v /dev/ad4s1b
> k
Hello.
On my desktop I use Intel MatrixRAID RAID5 soft raid controller. RAID5
is configured over 3 disks. FreeBSD 8.2 sees this as:
ar0: 953874MB status: READY
ar0: disk0 READY using ad4 at ata2-master
ar0: disk1 READY using ad6 at ata3-master
ar0: disk2 READY using ad12 at ata6-master
Root f
hi,
I have problems starting the bridge via rc.d:
rc.conf:
cloned_interfaces="bridge0"
ifconfig_bge0="up"
ifconfig_bridge0="addm bge0 up"
ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 up"
defaultrouter="192.168.1.254"
gateway_enable="YES"
It doesn't work. After reboot I have to set u
Not sure if geom_raid is implemented with cam. I remember a post a while
back about this issue to happen with defaulting cam in 9. Did not follow it
so not sure if something has been done about it.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Hello.
> On my desktop I use Intel Ma
Denny Schierz wrote:
hi,
I have problems starting the bridge via rc.d:
rc.conf:
cloned_interfaces="bridge0"
ifconfig_bge0="up"
ifconfig_bridge0="addm bge0 up"
ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 up"
Remember that rc.conf is a pure shell script. The line above overwrites
Am 17.01.2012 12:57, schrieb Denny Schierz:
> hi,
>
> I have problems starting the bridge via rc.d:
>
> rc.conf:
>
> cloned_interfaces="bridge0"
> ifconfig_bge0="up"
> ifconfig_bridge0="addm bge0 up"
> ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 up"
You forgot that rc.conf does not
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 18:37 +1100, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> The manual states that dumpdev "AUTO is the default as of FreeBSD
> 6.0" [1]
>
> However:
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD xx 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30
> UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr
On 18/01/12 2:07 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 18:37 +1100, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
The manual states that dumpdev "AUTO is the default as of FreeBSD
6.0" [1]
However:
# uname -a
FreeBSD xx 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30
UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse
Hi!
I have a zpool called data, and I have some inconsistencies with sizes.
$ zpool iostat
capacity operationsbandwidth
poolalloc free read write read write
-- - - - - - -
data3.32T 761G516 50 56.1M 1
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
Ups, I forgot to say that this is on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE and all
filesystems are v28.
--
chs,
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-s
The `zpool` command does not show all the overhead from ZFS. The `zfs`
command does. That's why the `zfs` command shows less available space
than the `zpool` command.
Thanks,
Shawn
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a zpool called data, and I have some i
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Shawn Webb wrote:
> The `zpool` command does not show all the overhead from ZFS. The `zfs`
> command does. That's why the `zfs` command shows less available space
> than the `zpool` command.
>
A overhead of almost 300GB? That seems a bit to much, don't you think?
I don't think so. On an OpenIndiana server I run, it shows almost a
full 1TB difference:
shawn@indianapolis:~$ zpool list tank
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
tank 4.06T 1.62T 2.44T39% 1.00x ONLINE -
shawn@indianapolis:~$ zfs list tank
NAME USED AVAIL REFER
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
> A overhead of almost 300GB? That seems a bit to much, don't you think?
> The pool consist of one vdev with two 1,5TB disks and one 3TB in raidz1.
>
Confused about your disks - can you show the output of zpool status.
If you have a raid
shawn@indianapolis:~$ pfexec format
Searching for disks...done
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c1d0
/pci@0,0/pci-ide@11/ide@0/cmdk@0,0
1. c1d1
/pci@0,0/pci-ide@11/ide@0/cmdk@1,0
2. c2d0
/pci@0,0/pci-ide@11/ide@1/cmdk@0,0
3. c2d1
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Christer Solskogen
> wrote:
>> A overhead of almost 300GB? That seems a bit to much, don't you think?
>> The pool consist of one vdev with two 1,5TB disks and one 3TB in raidz1.
>>
>
> Confused about your disks -
I had something similar on a software based RAID controller on my Intel
S5000PSL motherboard when I just went from 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE. After
adding geom_raid_load="YES" to my /boot/loader.conf, it still didn't create the
device on bootup. I had to manually create the label with graid. Af
Am 17.01.2012 16:47, schrieb Christer Solskogen:
> Hi!
>
> I have a zpool called data, and I have some inconsistencies with sizes.
>
> $ zpool iostat
>capacity operationsbandwidth
> poolalloc free read write read write
> -- - - - ---
I have been beating on of these a few days, i have udes freebsd 9.0 and 8.2
Both fails when i engage > 10 disks, the system craches and messages :
"Hyper transport sync flood" will get into the BIOS errorlog ( but nothing will
come to syslog since reboot is immediate)
Using a zfs radz of 25 disks
Hi guys,
Has anyone else noticed the tendency for 9.0-R to be unable to
accurately keep time? I've got a couple of machines that have been
upgraded from 8.2 that are struggling, in particular a Virtual box guest
that was fine on 8.2, but now that's its been upgraded to 9.0 counts at
anything
On 17.01.2012 12:53, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
On my desktop I use Intel MatrixRAID RAID5 soft raid controller. RAID5
is configured over 3 disks. FreeBSD 8.2 sees this as:
ar0: 953874MB status: READY
ar0: disk0 READY using ad4 at ata2-master
ar0: disk1 READY using ad6 at ata3-master
ar0: disk2 R
On 17.01.2012 19:03, Vinny Abello wrote:
I had something similar on a software based RAID controller on my Intel S5000PSL
motherboard when I just went from 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE. After adding
geom_raid_load="YES" to my /boot/loader.conf, it still didn't create the device
on bootup. I had
On 1/17/2012 4:04 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 17.01.2012 19:03, Vinny Abello wrote:
>> I had something similar on a software based RAID controller on my Intel
>> S5000PSL motherboard when I just went from 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE. After
>> adding geom_raid_load="YES" to my /boot/loader.conf
On 17.01.2012 23:35, Vinny Abello wrote:
On 1/17/2012 4:04 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 17.01.2012 19:03, Vinny Abello wrote:
I had something similar on a software based RAID controller on my Intel S5000PSL
motherboard when I just went from 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE. After adding
geom_raid_
On 1/17/2012 4:38 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 17.01.2012 23:35, Vinny Abello wrote:
>> On 1/17/2012 4:04 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
>>> On 17.01.2012 19:03, Vinny Abello wrote:
I had something similar on a software based RAID controller on my Intel
S5000PSL motherboard when I just we
Hi, all,
Am 17.01.2012 um 18:59 schrieb peter h :
> I have been beating on of these a few days, i have udes freebsd 9.0 and 8.2
> Both fails when i engage > 10 disks, the system craches and messages :
> "Hyper transport sync flood" will get into the BIOS errorlog ( but nothing
> will
> come to s
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:59:08PM +0100, peter h wrote:
> I have been beating on of these a few days, i have udes freebsd 9.0 and 8.2
> Both fails when i engage > 10 disks, the system craches and messages :
> "Hyper transport sync flood" will get into the BIOS errorlog ( but nothing
> will
> come
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:59:08 +0100, peter h wrote:
I have been beating on of these a few days, i have udes freebsd 9.0 and
8.2
Both fails when i engage > 10 disks, the system craches and messages :
"Hyper transport sync flood" will get into the BIOS errorlog ( but
nothing will
come to sysl
Am 17.01.2012 um 23:09 schrieb Jeremy Chadwick:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:59:08PM +0100, peter h wrote:
>> I have been beating on of these a few days, i have udes freebsd 9.0 and 8.2
>> Both fails when i engage > 10 disks, the system craches and messages :
>> "Hyper transport sync flood" will
On Tuesday 17 January 2012 23.15, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:59:08 +0100, peter h wrote:
>
> > I have been beating on of these a few days, i have udes freebsd 9.0 and
> > 8.2
> > Both fails when i engage > 10 disks, the system craches and messages :
> > "Hyper transport sync fl
The X4500s are oldish systems built around a pair Opteron 290 chips with
16 GB RAM and 6 PCI-X Marvell SATA controllers with 8 ports each
supporting 48 drives in the machine. Only the first and 4th drive on
the I think 4th controller are bootable. Are you using the latest
firmware? If not,
Hi all,
Am 18.01.2012 um 00:14 schrieb peter h :
> On Tuesday 17 January 2012 23.15, Ronald Klop wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:59:08 +0100, peter h wrote:
>>
>>> I have been beating on of these a few days, i have udes freebsd 9.0 and
>>> 8.2
>>> Both fails when i engage > 10 disks, the syst
On Jan 17, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I do not have one of these boxes / am not familiar with them, but
> HyperTransport is an AMD thing. The concept is that it's a bus that
> interconnects different pieces of a system to the CPU (and thus the
> memory bus).
While that was a nic
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 03:12:19PM -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > I do not have one of these boxes / am not familiar with them, but
> > HyperTransport is an AMD thing. The concept is that it's a bus that
> > interconnects different pieces of a
Am 17.01.2012 um 14:23 schrieb Stefan Esser:
> You forgot that rc.conf does not contain commands, but only variable
> assignments. The latter of the last two lines overwrites the value
> set in the former.
ah, ok, that wasn't clear for me. I tried several combinations, so I try it
again. Thanks
Am Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:12:51 +
schrieb Joe Holden :
> Hi guys,
>
> Has anyone else noticed the tendency for 9.0-R to be unable to
> accurately keep time? I've got a couple of machines that have been
> upgraded from 8.2 that are struggling, in particular a Virtual box
> guest that was fine
38 matches
Mail list logo
