On Thu, January 5, 2012 14:28, Malcolm Waltz wrote:
> I've included a working vsftpd.conf below for FTPES. For what you are
> doing, you may not need all of these parameters. The pasv_ parameters are
> mostly only necessary if you need to serve data through a NAT/firewall.
> The pasv_min_port an
Hi guys,
I upgraded my desktop at work just around christmas to 9-PRERELEASE builds
and ipv6 has been broken since then. I've been too busy at work to fix it
but today I finally had the chance to figure it out.
Currently I'm running:
12:11:15 tech304:~ > uname -a
FreeBSD tech304.office.sup
Hi All!
When svn installed and the source stored in git, then now the version
detection failed. The attached patch fixed this situation.
--
Oliver Pinter
(Tresorium)
From a84c998c251a83ba3fa3c734b7fbc6fe1af17c6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Pinter
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 12:17:43 +0100
On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:48 AM, David Magda wrote:
> On Thu, January 5, 2012 14:28, Malcolm Waltz wrote:
>
>> I've included a working vsftpd.conf below for FTPES. For what you are
>> doing, you may not need all of these parameters. The pasv_ parameters are
>> mostly only necessary if you need to s
On 6 January 2012 22:19, Mark Felder wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
Hi,
> I upgraded my desktop at work just around christmas to 9-PRERELEASE builds
> and ipv6 has been broken since then. I've been too busy at work to fix it
> but today I finally had the chance to figure it out.
>
> Currently I'm running:
On 6 January 2012 21:50, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> When svn installed and the source stored in git, then now the version
> detection failed. The attached patch fixed this situation.
>
FWIW, a different version proposed by Maciej Milewski on -current
some time ago. I don't have/use git, s
On Friday 06 January 2012 19:35:31 Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 6 January 2012 21:50, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> > Hi All!
> >
> > When svn installed and the source stored in git, then now the version
> > detection failed. The attached patch fixed this situation.
>
> FWIW, a different version proposed
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> On Friday 06 January 2012 19:35:31 Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>> On 6 January 2012 21:50, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>> > Hi All!
>> >
>> > When svn installed and the source stored in git, then now the version
>> > detection failed. The attached patc
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:49:45 -0600, Sergey Kandaurov
wrote:
You mean ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES" ?
Yes... Unfortunately that's what I get for typing it manually and being
distracted at the time. :-)
What is in your rc.conf? Do you have "inet6 accept_rtadv" keyword in it?
IIRC it
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Peter wrote:
>> I've just updated from 9.0RC3 to 9.0-stable r229626 after a clean
>> install. However when trying to add the first packages I noticed that
>> pkg_add is installing packages from
>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-current/ an
On 01/04/12 14:43, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
Hi all, I've noticed that the md5 hashes of a couple of files on
a gmirror change when I recalculate the hashes. The output usually
cycles between 2 hashes per file.
I'm guessing this is because each calculation reads the file
randomly from 1 of 2 compone
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 04/01/2012 19:43, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
> > Hi all, I've noticed that the md5 hashes of a couple of files on
> > a gmirror change when I recalculate the hashes. The output usually
> > cycles between 2 hashes per file.
> >
> >
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 19:37 +, miyamoto moesasji wrote:
> Thanks for the response Peter. Still seems strange that this change
> has not been made, but I'll indeed set it manually for now.
Sorry for the delay cleaning that up. It should be fixed as of
r229748.
--
Looping in hrs@ because he's the author of those changes.
On 01/06/2012 11:35, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:49:45 -0600, Sergey Kandaurov
> wrote:
>
>>
>> You mean ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES" ?
>>
> Yes... Unfortunately that's what I get for typing it manually and being
> d
Freebsd-update is both an excellent tool, but also sadly lacking in some ways,
mostly documentation. Let's look at a recent experience...
-
# uname -a
FreeBSD splash.internal 8.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p5 #0: Tue Sep 27
16:49:00 UTC 2011
r...@amd64-builder.daemono
15 matches
Mail list logo